SHARE:  

  

Omicron All-in-one-box

 

EE-News
News and announcements from EE Publishers  Issue 234, August 2013
EE-News masthead

 

Please share with colleagues, friends and family. All are welcome. 

Invitation to the:

62nd SAIEE Bernard Price Memorial Lecture 

  

On behalf of the South African Institute of Electrical Engineers (SAIEE) you, your friends, colleagues and family are cordially invited to the 62nd SAIEE Bernard Price Memorial Lecture, entitled:

 

The Internet Past Present and Future
 

presented by

 

Vint Cerf, chief internet evangelist, Google 

 
DATE: Friday 6 September 2013
TIME: 18h30
VENUE: Lecture Hall 1, Level 5, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wits University
COST: Free-of-charge, including a cocktail party after the lecture
 
Vinton G. Cerf has served as vice president and chief internet evangelist for Google since October 2005. In this role, he is responsible for identifying new enabling technologies to support the development of advanced, internet-based products and services from Google. He is also an active public face for Google in the internet world.
 
Widely known as one of the "Fathers of the Internet," Cerf is the co-designer of the TCP/IP protocols and the architecture of the Internet. In December 1997, President Clinton presented the US National Medal of Technology to Cerf and his colleague, Robert E. Kahn, for founding and developing the internet. Kahn and Cerf were named the recipients of the ACM Alan M. Turing award in 2004 for their work on the internet protocols. The Turing award is sometimes called the "Nobel Prize of Computer Science". In November 2005, President George Bush awarded Cerf and Kahn the Presidential Medal of Freedom for their work. The medal is the highest civilian award given by the United States to its citizens. In April 2008, Cerf and Kahn received the prestigious Japan Prize, and in 2013 Cerf, Kahn and three others received the Queen Elizabeth Prize in Engineering.
 
Further information and registration
 
For catering purposes, please RSVP to Gerda Geyer, SAIEE, 011 487-3003, geyerg@saiee.org.za, or register online here.

 

 

 

Outcomes of the Acid Mine Drainage Debate

 

The debate on Acid Mine Drainage: Solutions and Funding Models was hosted by EE Publishers as follows:
 
DATE: Thursday 29 August 2013
TIME: 15h30 for 16h00 to 18h30
VENUE: Axiz Auditorium, corner New Road and Sixth Road, Midrand

The purpose of the debate was to unpack the subject of Acid Mine Drainage: Solutions and Funding Models, so the audience and media get a better understanding of the background, current key issues, policy decisions, technologies, solutions and business models for AMD remediation and mine-waste reclamation, and the way forward... (more)
 

Audio recording of the debate

 
Click here to listen to a podcast of the debate 

 

Introduction by the chairperson

 
Introductory address and introduction of the presenters

by Chairperson Prof. Tracy-Lynn Humby, Wits University (Word doc)

  

Presentations by the speakers
 
 

Presentation by Prof. Tony Turton, University of Free State (Powerpoint)
Presentation by Ken Bouch, Fraser Alexander Water Treatment (Powerpoint)
Presentation by Eddie Milne, Mintails SA (Powerpoint)
Presentation by Eddie Milne, Mintails SA (Word doc)
Presentation by Mariette Liefferink, FSE (Powerpoint)
 
Outcomes
 
The three motions and the outcomes of the voting after the debate were: 

  • Motion 1: "Mining benefited the SA economy as a whole, so all taxpayers should pay for AMD remediation and rehabilitation through the fiscus, as this is the cost of development". No delegates supported this motion. 
  • Motion 2: "Mining companies benefited from mining in SA, and therefore as polluters the mining industry itself should pay for AMD remediation and rehabilitation". About 35 delegates supported this motion.
  • Motion 3: "The mining industry and government should share the burden of AMD remediation and rehabilitation, and together establish sustainable solutions and revenue streams that minimise the cost to the economy". About 103 delegates supported this motion.

It is hoped that the Department of Water Affairs (who were notable by their absence) is listening closely to the total rejection of Motion 1 (not a single vote for this motion after the debate), the significant lack of support for Motion 2, and the overwhelming support for Motion 3.

 

Background reading

 

Click here for background reading matter provided by Prof. Tony Turton and Mariette Liefferink prior to the debate.      

  

 

Get the latest EE journals free-of-charge:
(Tablet and PC editions)
Energize_e-zine_august_2013
  
  
(Tablet and PC editions)
EngineerIT August 2013
  
  
(Tablet and PC editions)
  
(Tablet and PC editions)
Postionit_aug13_e-zine_flip