It’s based on a true story and it shows the best side of people and what is possible in America. We need more of this and less of the Backwoods Jack mentality.
Most of the time, “what you see is what you get.” But there is a lot of growing discontent and anger that is lurking beneath the surface. It takes a “Backwoods Jack” to remind me that there is a different reality out there, just waiting for a spark that will ignite social unrest and bring people into the streets-mostly young people. Us old timers know better. It’s already happening now in France. That’s the result of socialism and youth – they want more and those who have it give them The Bird. Then you get the Yellow Vests. Could we see a movement like that here in America? A movement against those in power and the super-rich? This is a natural consequence of the rhetoric people like AOC and Maxime Waters. All it will take is a spark, and that spark could come from a collapse in the stock market which would let the air out of the economy. There will be massive unemployment and finger pointing.
Most of the people I know do not believe this could happen here. They also believe that the economy and the stock market will always be strong. It’s easy to think that way because the last time the stock market collapsed, and we had a depression so long ago that everyone who experienced it are dead. I was born in 1942 and have never known really bad times. But that doesn’t mean they will never return. It’s called “The Normalcy Bias.” People act on what they know, what they have experienced. And no one I know has experienced a Depression or a stock market collapse so how could they see it coming?
I’ve been around the block a few times. I’m 77 and the world I live in today has little in common with the world I grew up in, in the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s. Apart from technology, which changed everything. The big difference I see is a widening gap that is forming in America between liberal and conservative, the rich and the poor, the Christians and Jews, the perceived threat of the Arabs, the hordes of Latinos pouring across our southern border and the white conservative Americans fear of people of color. We have to roll the calendar back 175 years, to the Civil War, to find such divisiveness. It hasn’t reached
that
level yet, but all it will take is another stock market crash and depression. Everyone will look for someone to blame. And if you are an affluent white Republican, living in the suburbs, you my friend will have a target on your back. And if you are one of the disenfranchised and without a job, maybe you would feel the same way too?
America is a great place to live, in spite of my “rant”- I can’t think of anywhere else I would rather be. I am not taking Doug Casey or Bill Bonner’s advice to move to Argentina or any place where I don’t speak the language or know the culture.
But one thing I do know for sure – we will not make America Great Again simply by wearing a red MAGA hat and flying an American flag. And we will not make America Great Again by building a wall or taking from the rich and giving it to the poor. We ought to start by finding a way to create meaningful jobs for those in need of employment. We must find a way to give young people a good college education that is affordable. We could fund this and have enough left over to fix our deteriorating infrastructure by pulling out of the middle east and by trying to find common ground with Russia and China instead of issuing threats and imposing tariffs. We must find a way to run our government like a business and not spend way, way more than we take in on taxes. Term limits and the elimination of PACS would be a good start. What do you think the odds of that happening are?
Here at Miles Franklin we understand the mindset of affluent Americans. We have been dealing with them for over 30 years. By and large, they believe that the economy, prosperity and the stock market are going up for as far as the eye can see. So why would anyone need gold and silver. I guess if you believe that trees grow to the sky, and the stock market will never come down to earth (I’m talking about a Dow at 25% of today’s value) then why need gold or silver? I just don’t happen to buy that narrative.
So you probably would like to know my thoughts on where the price of gold is headed and the timing. I wish I knew. I can tell you with certainty that gold is going up, or down. And there will be another bull market – sooner or later. That’s as much as anyone can tell you. But for me, it’s enough to know that one of these days the stock market will crash, and the dollar will tumble, and gold and silver will be the asset to own. Like I so often write, the fat lady has yet to sing, but she is waiting right off stage and it could be soon.
Is this the proof we’ve been waiting for? Ted Butler sure thinks so.
Early this morning Ed Steer came out with the following:
A recent interview with former CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton nearly knocked me off my feet because it confirmed what I have alleged, starting more than 12 years ago. I'll include the interview later, but first I will set the background of the subject and timeline in order put Chilton's words into the proper perspective. The subject is JPMorgan's manipulation of the silver market. The timeline is important because Chilton does misstate some facts that need to be corrected. I'm not a big fan of articles that include lots of links to past articles, but in this case it's unavoidable.
Shortly after Bart Chilton took office as a commissioner in August 2007, he began to make public speeches in which he asserted that the CFTC was no regulatory pushover, like Barney Fife on the "Andy Griffith Show" but more like Elliot Ness or James Bond and that the agency was a tough cop on the beat. I assumed Chilton was genuine in his faith in the agency, but since he was brand new to commodity regulation I was sure that he was unaware of my allegations to the agency over the prior 20 years about a silver manipulation due to a concentrated short position on the COMEX. So I wrote to him about his claims of regulatory toughness at the agency and encouraged others to do so as well.
To his credit, Commissioner Chilton, responded to my and others' e-mails quickly, pointing out that CFTC staff were aware of the allegations and having responded in the past, they would do so again in the future.
I would ask you to note that my first contacts with Commissioner Chilton took place shortly after he assumed office in 2007 and the subject matter revolved around the concentrated short position in COMEX silver futures, an issue that has remained at the heart of the allegations of price manipulation to this day.
This
absolute must read
commentary by Ted, which confirms everything that Ted has said about JPMorgan and the CFTC...plus more
Confirmation, Outrage and Disgust
A recent interview with former CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton nearly knocked me off my feet because it confirmed what I have alleged, starting more than 12 years ago. I’ll include the interview later, but first I will set the background of the subject and timeline in order put Chilton’s words into the proper perspective. The subject is JPMorgan’s manipulation of the silver market. The timeline is important because Chilton does misstate some facts that need to be corrected. I’m not a big fan of articles that include lots of links to past articles, but in this case it’s unavoidable.
Shortly after Bart Chilton took office as a commissioner in August 2007, he began to make public speeches in which he asserted that the CFTC was no regulatory pushover, like Barney Fife on the “Andy Griffith Show” but more like Elliot Ness or James Bond and that the agency was a tough cop on the beat. I assumed Chilton was genuine in his faith in the agency, but since he was brand new to commodity regulation I was sure that he was unaware of my allegations to the agency over the prior 20 years about a silver manipulation due to a concentrated short position on the COMEX. So I wrote to him about his claims of regulatory toughness at the agency and encouraged others to do so as well.
To his credit, Commissioner Chilton, responded to my and others’ emails quickly, pointing out that CFTC staff were aware of the allegations and having responded in the past, they would do so again in the future.
I would ask you to note that my first contacts with Commissioner Chilton took place shortly after he assumed office in 2007 and the subject matter revolved around the concentrated short position in COMEX silver futures, an issue that has remained at the heart of the allegations of price manipulation to this day.
Much to his credit, Chilton always endeavored to answer each and every email sent to him from the public (provided those emails weren’t personally insulting). In fact, I continued to email him personally and encouraged others to do so as well, in addition to sending him and the other commissioners all articles I wrote. I think it’s fair to say that close to 99% of the thousands of public emails sent to Chilton concerned the silver and gold price manipulation and there can be little doubt that all of those emails came directly or indirectly at my urging. What else could possible account for the high volume of public correspondence with an official of the CFTC?
Early in 2008, Commissioner Chilton indicated to me privately that the agency would be coming out with a new finding concerning the continued numerous public allegations of a silver price manipulation. This new finding would supersede the 15 page public letter of 2004. Perhaps I misinterpreted his message, but I came to believe that the new finding would be much different than the original finding. Instead, on May 13, 2008, the CFTC published another 16-page denial that anything was wrong with the concentrated short position in COMEX silver futures.
Feeling betrayed (something I don’t believe I revealed previously), I told Chilton in not-so-polite terms how I felt and ceased personal email contact with him (although I did continue to send my articles to him and all the other commissioners, since they concerned regulatory matters).
In March 2008, nearly two months before the CFTC’s 2
nd
public silver letter was published, the largest concentrated COMEX silver (and gold) short, Bear Stearns, failed and its short positions were assumed by JPMorgan. I certainly knew that Bear Stearns collapsed and was taken over by JPMorgan, but I had no idea at the time that Bear was the biggest single short in COMEX silver and gold or that JPMorgan assumed those short positions. I would only learn of this months later, after the August 2008 Bank Participation Report was issued and revealed for the very first time an enormous silver and gold short position held, as it turned out, by a single US bank. (The reason Bear Stearns had never appeared in the Bank Participation Report was because it was an investment, not a commercial bank like JPMorgan).
Importantly, as a result of this article and others, which encouraged readers to again petition the CFTC, the agency confirmed it had initiated a formal investigation by its Enforcement Division - I believe primarily due to Chilton’s initiative (although for some reason, Chilton claims in his interview that the investigation started in 2010, at the prodding by Andrew Maguire). Fortunately the record of the timeline is clear, although the original confirmation was buried in an overall press release on Oct 2, 2008 –
The termination of the investigation was more fully announced five years later –
Within months of the August 2008 Bank Participation report, I had deduced that JPMorgan was the big COMEX silver and gold short and began publicly referring to the bank as the big silver and gold crook and price manipulator (albeit with more trepidation initially than as time passed). Please know that all my deductions and allegations came from studying public data and official correspondence from the CFTC to lawmakers, as many readers wrote to their elected officials about what had transpired. I never talked with anyone at the CFTC about any of this – to them, I was always persona non grata.
But in the fall of 2008 when I came to figure out that JPMorgan had been running the silver and gold manipulation since March of that year, it also dawned on me that there could be no way that the CFTC wasn’t fully aware that Bear Stearns was in deep trouble with its COMEX silver and gold short positions before the JPM takeover, since prices of each rose substantially from yearend 2007 to the day in March when JPM took over the short positions. Bear Stearns would have needed to have come up with more than a billion dollars in cash for margin calls, money it simply didn’t have.
Since the CFTC would have had to have known of Bear’s plight and of JPMorgan taking over its silver and gold short positions, it also became obvious to me that the CFTC had lied through its teeth when it failed to mention in its public letter of May 2008 that the biggest concentrated silver and gold short seller failed and needed to be taken over by JPMorgan. After all, the subject of the public letter was concentration on the short side of silver, so there was no way the Bear Stearns’ failure could have been innocently overlooked. I said so in a subsequent public article, even writing to the CFTC’s Inspector General about it –
OK, that’s the background and timeline, so why am I walking you down memory lane today? It seems that Bart Chilton, whose tenure as a commissioner at the CFTC ended in early 2014, has chosen to speak out on the silver manipulation and his and the agency’s role at the time. This is the very first time that an insider has confirmed virtually everything I’ve alleged about JPMorgan. In fact, Chilton goes beyond just confirming what I’ve alleged, he paints a picture of deep concern behind the scenes, as the CFTC struggled to get JPMorgan’s silver short position reduced – to no avail. Here is the interview with Chris Marcus of Arcadia Economics –
Since the interview is about 42 minutes long, please allow me to highlight what I believe are the key points.
At the 3:30 minute mark, Chilton acknowledges that he first learned of the allegations of a silver manipulation from me, but then goes on to say he asked for an Enforcement Division investigation only after Andrew Maguire contacted him in 2010, which as I indicated is contrary to the verified record which indicated the investigation began in September 2008.
At the 11:40 minute mark and continuing to the 18:30 mark, it gets interesting. This is where Chilton acknowledges publicly for the first time that JPMorgan took over Bear Stearns’ silver short position and goes on to explain how the CFTC had to approve the resultant excessively large combined short position and did so on a temporary basis of no more than a few months and how JPMorgan didn’t abide by the CFTC’s waiver. He also points out how the head silver trader for Bear Stearns also went over to JPM and continue to trade the position there. Chilton states that he was shocked about how large the JPMorgan silver short position grew to and implies it was eventually worked down. Perhaps JPM’s silver short position was worked down temporarily as it rigged prices lower, but as regular readers know, JPM has continued to add shorts and buy back on lower prices to this day, a decade later.
At the 20:20 mark, Chilton acknowledges the agency had plenty of evidence of manipulation, but not enough to bring charges and asked for outside help in determining whether the evidence was enough to bring charges. Chilton claims he extended the investigation for another year and believed there was enough evidence to bring charges. It should be noted, even though I caused the investigation to be initiated in the first place, I was never contacted.
At the 36:40 mark, Chilton acknowledges for the first time that the Justice Department was involved in the five year silver investigation but dropped interest after the CFTC closed its investigation. He suggests the DOJ is understaffed. Also mentioned is that Chilton had perhaps a hundred separate meetings on the silver investigation back then, in addition to the dozens of official agency meetings on silver that the agency held. It’s remarkable with all that attention, JPMorgan was able to continue to manipulate silver prices to this day without missing a beat. And I distinctly remember all through this time, which Chilton described as full of high drama behind the scenes, not one word was offered publicly to warn anyone that there were strong official suspicions of manipulation. All I ever recall is that the CFTC found all my allegations of silver manipulation to be completely unfounded. Chilton seems to be saying something quite different in this interview.
What Chilton said confirmed just about everything I’ve written and for that I am grateful. Again, all my analysis has been based strictly on public data. While I’m happy for the confirmation, I’m also outraged and disgusted that the CFTC and DOJ failed to end the manipulation and that JPMorgan has continued on its merry and illegal way. I’ve reached the conclusion that JPMorgan is so well-connected and backed by such legal firepower that even the US Government, certainly in the form of the CFTC, but now also including the Justice Department, is no match for it. As a result, my expectations for the DOJ cracking down on JPM have been reduced to a faint hope, although it saddens me to admit to that.
That said, I do believe more than ever that it will be JPMorgan’s actions over the past decade that will power silver (and gold) higher. No one would acquire the massive amount of physical silver and gold that JPMorgan has accumulated without the expectation of a monster payday. Separately, Chilton’s confirmation that the CFTC (and DOJ) were investigating and pressuring JPM would seem to dispel any notion that it was or is the US Government behind the silver (and gold) manipulation. The CFTC and DOJ are US Government institutions, after all.
They may be no match for JPMorgan, but that’s a far cry from either being involved in some conspiracy to manipulate prices. Finally, the degree of alarm and concern by the regulators, according to Chilton, would seem to mock all the manipulation deniers who maintain there is nothing to see. According to Chilton, the regulars saw plenty to be concerned about.
Ted Butler
April 4, 2019
The markets are in lock down and nothing out of the ordinary has happened that need my commentary. Well, actually there is one new trend. Palladium, which recently was selling for nearly an astounding $300 an ounce more than gold, has come back down to earth, priced at less than $100 an ounce higher, and still trending down. There is blood on the streets for the Comex Palladium longs. I’m waiting to see the same thing happen to the stock market.
And finally, just for kicks, Check out these chalk drawings. These are absolutely amazing! Enjoy!!!
The Chalk Guy Is Back
