Crucifixion, Matthias Grunewald, c. 1515
Both of these ways of depicting the cross and the crucified shed light on true aspects of this mystery. The modern way -- dramatic, realistic, excruciating -- represents the crude reality, the moment when Christ dies upon it. The cross is a symbol of evil, suffering, and the tremendous reality of death.
The ancient way sheds light not on the cross' causes but its effects; not that which creates the cross, but that which the cross itself creates: reconciliation, peace, glory, eternal life….The Feast is called the "Exaltation" of the Cross, celebrating this aspect.
To the modern approach, the ancient should be united: rediscovering the glorious cross. If when we were suffering it was helpful to think of Jesus on the cross in pain so that we could feel closer to him, it is necessary to think of the cross in a fuller way.
I will explain what I mean by an example. Suppose we have lost a loved one, after months of terrible suffering. It is good not to continue to think of her as she was then, torturing ourselves perhaps in our heart and mind. All of that is over, it does not exist, it is unreal. If we continued in this way, we would only prolong the suffering and keep it alive artificially.
|