COALITION SPONSOR - 2015/16


PUBLIC SERVICE OBLIGATIONS RANT

 
WHICH VIEWERS ARE MORE IMPORTANT?
SHOULD THE VIEWERS OF PRIMARY STATIONS HAVE MORE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO THEIR PROGRAMMING DESIRES THAN YOUR LOCAL, ETHNIC, OR SPECIAL INTEREST LPTV CHANNEL?  IS THIS CONSTITUTIONAL?

With all of the important breaking news about the Class A and LPTV court cases, I have not done a rant in quite a while, which I am sure some of you are glad of.  But today I just got to say something.  I attended a webinar yesterday hosted by TV Technology, a trade media source we reference in this newsletter on a regular basis. The webinar was a paid event with Howard Symons of the FCC's Incentive Auction Task Force, industry experts, and TV Technology reporter and host.  Via the chat function during the webinar I asked the question in the title above. This was live folks, so each of the 7 participants of the event in their own offices, watching slides, and talking.  The reporter asked Howard Symons my question.  Now before I go any further, you need to know that this dude and I have been dueling now for going on three years about all of the auction crap.  So I say with a little glee....back to the story.  When asked out of the blue the question, "which viewers were more important, primaries or LPTV viewers?", Howard paused, and then acknowledged that the question threw him some.  And then like the pro he is went back to his talking points about all of the things the FCC is going to do for LPTV and translators.  But his response is the "tell", the weak spot, the soft underbelly of the FCC's fear about us. It is our viewers, which if aroused, could shake the FCC and Congress to action. And that is just what is going on right now, today, tonight, and for more than 7000 times in the past few weeks.  Here is what I found out...

Last month the FCC issued a Notice of Inquiry (MB Docket No. 16-41)
"Promoting the Availability of Diverse and Independent Sources of Video Programming".   I am planning on filing comments into the proceeding so that the programming concerns and problems of LPTV are included.  But what I found out is that  RFD-TV, " Rural America's Most Important Network", has mounted a viewer write-in into the proceeding - and as of today have over 7000+ filed comments!!!  THIS IS HUGE!  But wait - there's more.

I next went over to RabbitEars and checked out the Networks list, and quickly found out that fraking RFD-TV only has two (2) free over the air broadcast outlets.  One is a large translator system (which may be paying for it), and the other a single rural station. So RFD-TV is not using OTA TV at all, or maybe the RabbitEars data is wrong.  But it is not. I think it is clear, that what is going on, is yet another network barred from LPTV because of the MVPD-exclusive contracts.  Then again, it may just be all about money. 

IN SUMMARY
Congress will need to include an additional $1 billion for LPTV and translators also. 
  • We are providing our public service obligations mission under official spectrum licenses from the FCC, and our viewers are secondary to no other group.  If you believe they do not have equal rights, then frak you.
  • We have been encouraged to invest into providing free over the air broadcasting to unserved and underserved audiences and communities, that is one of our specific charters. 
  • We transmit from over 2250 locations, and are authorized for almost 10,000 stations.  Of those, about 950 of these locations have only one LPTV or translator.  If the vacant channel order goes through, these communities of license for LPTV and translators could be displaced with nowhere to go.  
  • We still have 1500 remaining analog to digital conversions, split equally between rural translators and urban LPTV. 
  • We have another 2000+ outstanding new construction permits mostly in rural areas, along major national highways, and clusters of up to 100 MHz in a community. 
  • Across the country we currently have over 5000 facilities operating, with more than 3000 digital subchannels of diverse, local, and the only low cost access point for broadcast programming ventures.  
  • Today, over 200 local government agencies are licensees of more than 2400 LPTV and translators.  They could have an aggregated unfunded mandate cost of $250 million to relocate transmission facilities or channels.
  • When fully built out, LPTV and translators will have over 1.6 billion coverage pops (9.2 billion MHz pops). Today, the primaries and nce have 4 billion, and the Class A's, 500 million coverage pops.
  • We have been invited and encouraged to invest into a national EAS reception and transmission capability, which we do everyday, 24/7, to communities and audiences unreached by the primaries. Are we not a vital part of the nation's self-defense and emergency preparedness and communications system?
  • WHY ARE OUR VIEWERS ANY LESS IMPORTANT, AND ANY LESS IN NEED OF PUBLIC SERVICE OBILGATIONS?
  • WE WANT RELOCATION FUNDING LIKE EVERYONE ELSE! 
  • FRAK, EVEN THE CABLE COMPANIES GET RELO COST MONEY AND WE DO NOT!!! 
  • OUR MULTI-CULTURAL, MULTI-GENERATIONAL VIEWERS, CORD CUTTERS AND SHAVERS, AND LOCAL ACCESS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES AND GROUPS, AND THE ENTRY POINT FOR MEDIA INVESTMENT AND SMALL BIZ ACTIVITIES IS EXACTLY WHAT CONGRESS AND THE FCC, AND THE COURTS, HAVE LEGISLATED AND REGULATED FOR OVER 30 YEARS NOW.  
  • YOU CREATED US TO FULFILL A VITAL NATIONAL FUNCTION, AND NOW YOU ARE SAYING GO FRAK YOURSELVES AND PAY FOR YOUR OWN RELO MOVES.
  • WE NEED A NEW INTERNET AGE INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL BAILOUT JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER INTEREST GROUP IN THIS DAMN AUCTION PROCESS.
Back to the court cases since we do have more updates from yesterday.

LAS VEGAS LPTV
SUB CHANNEL LEASE AVAILABLE
TOTAL MARKET COVERAGE WITH OVER 1.9M  POPS!

 
CLASS-A & LPTV
COURT CASES UPDATE  
THERE WAS A LOT OF ACTIVITY YESTERDAY IN THE FILING OF COURT OF APPEALS DOCUMENT

THE VIDEOHOUSE, INC. et al & LATINA Cases 
 

The Petitioner, Videohouse et al, has until today, March 9th, to file a reply to the FCC opposition to the Stay request.  So we expect that sometime next week the Court will rule on the Stay.  The scheduling of Oral Arguments for May 9th is about the case, not the Stay request.  Here are the other related documents of the case at this point in the process.

 
                         VIDEOHOUSE MAIN BRIEF     

 
                           CTA AMICUS FOR FCC 
                   LATINA AMICUS 


FAB & MAKO v FCC
JOINT DEFERRED APPENDIX - 03/14/2016.  FINAL BRIEFS 03/21/2016
ORAL ARGUMENTS IS MAY 9TH

         FAB OPENING BRIEF          FCC RESPONSE TO BRIEF        FAB RESPONSE TO FCC



                                  MAKO OPENING BRIEF          FCC RESPONSE TO BRIEF

The above is not an exhaustive list of the court case documentation, but items we have selected to give you an overview.


RELATED TRADE PRESS ARTICLES





COALITION NAB SHOW SPONSOR



CHICAGO LPTV
SUB CHANNEL LEASE AVAILABLE
SOLID COVERAGE WITH OVER 
9 MILLION COVERAGE POPS!

COALITION SPONSOR - 2014/2015/2016

 
    
CAN YOU IMAGINE AN FCC COMMISSIONER WHO HAD BEEN A BROADCASTER?





"...the book anecdotally tells Sikes' journey to Washington, where he worked under President Reagan for the Department of Commerce under Mac Baldrige. He then went back home and to Colorado to start a radio business before, 5 years later, he was appointed by President Bush to serve as chairman of the FCC. "

RENO NV LPTV
SUB CHANNEL LEASE AVAILABLE
TOTAL MARKET COVERAGE WITH OVER 585K  POPS!






ATLANTA LPTV
SUPER CLUSTER
CHECK OUT 6 LICENSES AND PERMITS IN A TOP TEN MARKET!

FLORIDA COAST
NEW LPTV CP
AVAILABLE
SOLID COVERAGE WITH OVER 
1.6 MILLION COVERAGE POPS!


 
CHICO CALIFORNIA
LPTV 
AVAILABLE
W/ PROGRAMMING
SOLID COVERAGE WITH OVER 
1.9 MILLION COVERAGE POPS!

COALITION SPONSOR - 2015/2016



LPTV AFFILIATES WANTED NATIONWIDE
CLEARED IN SF, LA, CHICAGO, HOUSTON, DALLAS, FRESNO...
COALITION SPONSOR - 2015/16



        
COALITION SPONSOR - 2014/2015/2016



COALITION SPONSOR - 2013/14/15/16
COALITION SPONSOR - 2015/2016




COALITION SPONSOR - 2015/2016



COALITION SPONSOR - 2013/14/15/16


Communications Law Attorneys representing clients before the FCC, the federal courts, and other regulatory, and governmental agencies on communications matters.

Chip Grange & Wray Fitch
(703) 873-7349 - www.gg-law.com
POTENTIAL SPONSORS
YOU ONLY HAVE 5 DAYS TO GET YOUR 2016 SPONSORSHIP

As much as $1 billion will be spent in the next 5 years to rebuild a highly displaced LPTV and TV translator industry.  This is the first step to introducing your products and services to 10,000 licensees and permittees. Check our sponsorship offerings to see how we can help you understand the low hanging fruit of who is building out now, and what will be happening to which players when in the future.  
 
Did you know that more than 75 auction eligible Class-A's collectively have as many as 1000 LPTV and translator licenses and permits?   Our industry could see in 2017 the start of a huge increase in investment capital.  Let us help you get the reach and frequency to put your brand and services in front of these new buyers.
 
Our Coalition is offering content and event sponsorships which we think could help with new business opportunities from the LPTV and TV translator industry.   
We have put together special packages related to the April NAB trade show in Las Vegas.  And you can also pick individually to customize for your own needs including our leading industry newsletter.



STAND-UP AND 
BE HEARD!

Start off the NAB Show in Las Vegas on Sunday night with the 
2016 Save LPTV Rally and industry gathering, and all around informative and good time. 
 
Last year's event drew a crowd over 300 licensees, and many product and service providers.  


2016 SPONSORS (AS OF 2/15/16)
       

     

                   

       
                
     

              


HELP US SELL OUT OUR 2016 SPONSORSHIPS!

 


SPONSORSHIP  DEADLINE
BOOK YOUR SPACE NOW!

TO BE LISTED IN THIS 
YEAR'S LPTV INDUSTRY DIRECTORY AND INCENTIVE AUCTION SURVIVAL GUIDE
PLEASE GO FILL OUT
THIS FORM FOR YOUR FREE LISTING. 

>  FREE LISTING
>  PREMIUM LISTINGS
>  DISPLAY ADS 
 




If you would like to be part of our collective effort to make sure LPTV and TV translators are treated fairly in the Incentive Auction and channel repacking JOIN US today!


Mike Gravino
Director
LPTV Spectrum Rights Coalition
(202) 604-0747
lptvcoalition@gmail.com
http://www.lptvcoalition.com