Logo
Vol. 8, Issue 11
November 1, 2017

FLORIDA DEALER SUED IN FEDERAL COURT
FOR TEXT MESSAGE VIOLATIONS

A class-action lawsuit was filed recently against a Florida dealership in federal court for alleged improper use of automated text messages to service customers.  The lawsuit alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") for the transmission of thousands of text messages about open recalls to potential customers.   Most of these texts were sent using an automated dialing system known as "robotext".
 
According to the lawsuit, the dealership contracted with a vendor to obtain names and cellphone numbers of prospective service customers whose vehicles had been recalled but not repaired.  The texts encouraged the recipients, who had no prior relation with the dealership and didn't authorize such calls, to schedule service appointments.  The suit further maintains that the dealership sent the text messages for the sole purpose of soliciting new service work and not for the purpose of notifying customers of open recalls.  The suit seeks damages, attorney fees and an injunction against sending further unsolicited text messages without consumers' consent.
 
Last February one of our articles focused on the use of text messaging in dealership marketing and the compliance guidance issued by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC").  Federal law restricts the use of automatic dialing systems, text messages, prerecorded voice messages and faxes, and requires advertisers to eliminate consumers listed on the national Do Not Call Registry. Violators face potential damages of $500 to $1,500 per violation.
 
The TCPA restricts autodialed calls and text messages to cell phones.  Autodialed calls includes the use of any equipment that has the capacity to store or produce numbers to be dialed and dial them without human intervention.  The TCPA prohibits autodialed calls or text messages, as well as prerecorded calls, unless made with the prior express consent of the called party. 

Generally when a service advisor texts a one-to-one personal message to a customer to obtain approval for job repairs or to notify a customer about vehicle status it is not considered a marketing message and therefore not a violation under the TCPA.  However, there is some risk in sending text messages that are not connected to the services requested by the customer.  For example, when a customer brings a car in to get a check engine light diagnosed but the service advisor texts the customer that tires or wipers need to be replaced then the text has become a marketing or solicitation message instead of a follow up on the services requested.  This can expose the dealership to costly fines, penalties and lawsuits.  Therefore, it is imperative that you educate all personnel who communicate with customers on the proper methods and contents of communications.    
 
The potential liability for violating the TCPA makes it vital that dealers work closely with their personnel and marketing teams to ensure compliance with the TCPA.  Generally a fine is only issued after a consumer files a complaint over the receipt of multiple calls or texts.  However, as is the case with the dealership in Florida, dealerships are being sued by consumers and aggressive consumer law firms seeking millions in damages for just one or two alleged inappropriate messages.
 
For more information on the TCPA or how you can use texts in your marketing campaigns contact Stevan LaBonte at 516-280-8580. 
 
If you would like to read the full FCC Enforcement Advisory visit apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-16-1299A1.pdf.     

NY AG OBTAINS ONE MILLION DOLLARS
 IN RESTITUTION AND PENALTIES
FROM NY DEALERS IN OCTOBER

The New York State Attorney General announced last month that dealerships in Long Island and Manhattan will pay more than $900,000 in restitution to nearly 6,400 consumers who were illegally charged for after-sale items plus pay $135,000 in civil penalties and costs to NYS.  This is on the heels of a new report issued by the National Consumer Law Center which alleges that the prices of many aftermarket products, including extended warranties, dent protection and credit insurance, are excessive, arbitrary and discriminate against certain customers. 
 
The investigations conducted by the NYS Attorney General resulted in two separate settlement agreements in connection with the unlawful sale of credit repair, identity theft protection services and other after-market products.  The NYS Attorney General claims that the investigations showed that many consumers were totally unaware that they had received the after-market services or believed that the services were free.  
 
In addition to the more than $1 million in restitution, penalties, and costs, the settlements entered into between the NY Attorney General and the dealerships prohibit:  
  • Selling, offering for sale, or marketing credit repair and identity theft services in connection with the sale or lease of a vehicle;
  • Selling, offering for sale, or providing to consumers any after-sale product or service unless, prior to such sale, certain material terms, including price, are disclosed verbally and in writing;
  • Misrepresenting the price of the vehicle in final lease or sale contracts; and
  • Failing to provide consumers with sales or lease agreements that clearly and conspicuously itemize each after-sale product or service and its price.
In his press release announcing the new settlements Attorney General Schneiderman stated that his office will "continue to make sure dealerships are not illegally profiting by charging unsuspecting consumers thousands of dollars on unwanted items."  Clearly the NYS Attorney General's Office will continue to vigorously investigate customer complaints and allegations of fraud and discrimination at auto dealerships.
 
The NCLC study looked at data on about 3 million add-on products sold from September 2009 through June 2015 at about 3,000 dealerships nationwide.  The study claims:  
  • Add-on products were sold at prices far above dealer costs;
  • Companies that provided car financing played a role in allowing excessive and discriminatory markups of add-on products; and 
  • Dealers inconsistently priced add-on products, which led to pricing discrimination. 
While many in the industry believe that the NCLC study is flawed and not indicative of the business practices of most dealerships the current regulatory environment requires that every dealer take a close look at their sales practices.  Here are a few recommendations for maintaining a legally compliant sales floor:  
  1. Use a fixed pricing matrix and menus for the description and sale of after-market products; 
  2. Itemize the name and price of each after-market product on the bill of sale (required in NYC);
  3. Have the customer sign each after-market agreement and initial their approval of each product on the bill of sale;
  4. Establish protocols for the immediate handling of customer complaints by senior employees or managers; and
  5. Provide regular training of sales personnel on federal, state and local laws.
The LaBonte Law Group can assist with the preparation of a response to any customer complaint whether it be filed by the customer, the customer's attorney or an agency such as the Attorney General's Office, Department of Consumer Affairs or the Better Business Bureau.  Our firm can also provide in-house training on auto dealer law and regulatory practices (everything from NYS laws on vehicle sales to federal laws on Privacy, Red Flag, Risk Based Pricing and Adverse Action requirements ).
 
Contact the LaBonte Law Group at 516-280-8580 or by e-mail at SLaBonte@LaBonteLawGroup.com.    
Should you have any questions or need advice on anything related to dealership operations please do not hesitate to give me a call at 516-280-8580 or send me an e-mail to slabonte@labontelawgroup.com.  Your questions will be answered promptly.
Sincerely,

Stevan H. LaBonte, Esq.
LaBonte Law Group, PLLC
1461 Franklin Avenue, Suite LL-S
Garden City, NY 11530

516.280.8580 (Phone) 
631.794.2434 (Fax)