|
As regular as locusts, this is the time of year - just before WWDC - that articles appear detailing what Apple "must do" in their next operating system or hardware releases. The article titles are scary: "Android features iOS 19 desperately needs," "What Apple Must Do to Survive," and, the most famous of all: "Apple is Doomed Because [well, um, fill in the blank]."
First, this isn't a new trend. Back in 2014, Time Magazine wrote an excellent article called: "'Apple Must…': A Brief History of People Instructing the Company to Do Things." It is eleven years old and still timely, because it illustrates how frequently off-base pundits actually are.
Second, though, is a deep misunderstanding of how tech works. These articles are not informed commentary, but simple click-bait. Creating new hardware takes, on average, four years from initial design through development, testing, validation, to final production. This means that Apple has, at a minimum, four years of unreleased hardware currently in varying stages of development.
To create the next major version of the macOS takes roughly two years. Significant dot releases take six months to a year. Even minor bug fixes take a month or two. Why such a long time? Sometimes it's because the technology hasn't been invented, or reliable components don't exist in enough quantity. But the bigger challenges are defining the task with enough clarity that a product can be developed, designing it to be manufactured in quantity, validating that it is secure and will work reliably when it hits the real world, then, actually manufacturing it. Sonos is an excellent example of an exciting product where testing went awry.
So, when pundits say that "Apple must do this by WWDC," they are only blowing smoke. All decisions about WWDC announcements were locked in January. Hardware releasing in 2026 began development in 2022. The version of the macOS releasing in the fall of 2026 is already in extended development. The version of macOS releasing in September is complete and in final testing and validation.
This is not to say that we shouldn't make suggestions, rather it is to illustrate that even if Apple moved as quickly as possible, the magnitude of design, development, testing, validation, manufacture, and release requires lead times measured in weeks and months; not the daily deadlines of rumor sites.
Until next Monday, stay hopeful, stay healthy and edit well.
|