|
On April 27, a three-judge panel was scheduled to begin a trial in the case, Phillips v State of Tennessee, challenging the Human Life Protection Act, the law that protects unborn children and their mothers from the horror of abortion in our state. The case was first brought to court in September of 2023 by three women and 2 physicians. The women claim that their right to life is in danger while the doctors claim the law is too vague for them to care for patients whose lives might be in danger.
The case has taken many twists and turns since then. In 2024, a three-judge panel ruled that while the case was being heard, physicians could not be sanctioned by the state’s medical board for aborting children in an emergency situation.
In 2025, the General Assembly amended the HLPA to clarify that certain conditions were covered under the medical exceptions that the law allows. They intended that the new clarifications would satisfy the judges and the case would be dropped. Despite the clarification, the judges ruled that the case should continue to trial.
The legislature passed SB1731 this year, which allows for an automatic immediate appeal of a Chancery Court decision. Attorney General Skrmetti was able to use that to appeal the Trial Court’s decision earlier this week to deny his request for summary judgment.
It helped that the Attorney General could use the legislature’s intent in SB1731 in the appeal by saying the Legislature has been definitive in their intent for the State to have more Sovereign Immunity.
"We are grateful to the General Assembly for enacting legislation this year to bolster the Attorney General’s position in the Phillips case. We are also grateful for the Attorney General’s team for using every weapon in their arsenal to protect life in this State," said Stacy Dunn, President of Tennessee Right to Life.
|