SC Energy Security Act (H.3309) advances to the Senate
The full Senate Judiciary Committee passed the SC Energy Security Act (H.3309) after considering, but ultimately not adopting, a number of amendments. Senator Jason Elliot (District 6 - Greenville) introduced an amendment that would have preserved a local government’s ability to approve, modify, or deny solar projects, but this amendment failed after a philosophical debate over “home rule.”
Currently, energy projects with a designed capacity of more than 75 megawatts are required to receive approval from the SC Public Service Commission (PSC). Under H.3309, energy projects with a footprint of over 125 acres — about 20 megawatts of solar — would also have to receive PSC approval in addition to local, state, and federal permits. We hope Senators continue to consider the merits of keeping these types of solar projects under county jurisdiction and preserve the solar industry’s ability to add clean energy to the grid faster than any other generation resource.
Another amendment proposed by Senator Russell Ott (District 26 - Calhoun) would have closed a loophole allowing utilities to submit incomplete applications and run out the clock on the new six month timeline on permits for energy projects. The amendment would have also removed a harmful provision that would have limited who could appeal a permit decision by the state agency. Confusion among the committee about current law led to the amendment getting voted down.
The remainder of the amendments adopted by the committee ultimately don’t address our issues with the bill related to permitting, property rights, and how groups are able to weigh in on utility issues at the PSC. The Senate has now set this bill for special order for this Tuesday, April 1, meaning we can expect long hours of debate on the Senate floor.
This will be your last chance to reach out to your Senator about this bill now two years in the making. Please consider contacting them to clean up the permitting loopholes and preserve local communities’ ability to weigh in on these energy projects. If you’re looking for a place to start, the two failed amendments described above would have meaningful impacts to this bill if adopted.
|