Public Health Authority
Case Updates

May 17, 2024




Case updates this week:

 




Monday May 13th: The federal district court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a challenge to New York City’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate in Sutton v. Adams. Sutton, a former employee of the City of New York, was fired after refusing to comply with the City’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for all employees. The plaintiff alleged that the City violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause because the City enforced the mandate more strictly against public employees than employees of private employers. However, the court rejected this argument, stating that City employees are not a protected class, and past precedent establishes that refusing vaccination is not a fundamental right. Therefore, the rational basis standard applied. Under this standard, the court dismissed the case, holding that the City’s vaccine mandate was rationally related to protecting the public from COVID-19 in City buildings, a compelling government interest.

 

The Newsletter will take a break for the next two weeks. We will be back in your inbox on 6/7.

 
 
This newsletter is distributed by Public Health Law Watch as part of Act for Public Health, a working group of the Public Health Law Partnership that is convening to provide law and policy research, analysis, and expertise in support of public health authority.
The Public Health Law Partnership includes organizations with decades of experience in public health law, authority, and governance, including ChangeLab Solutions, the Network for Public Health Law, the Center for Public Health Law Research at Temple University, the Public Health Law Center at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, and Public Health Law Watch, a George Consortium initiative housed at the Center for Health Policy and Law at Northeastern University.
 
 
 
Twitter