While the Fed stated that using BTFP funding would not raise supervisory concerns, calling the program “part of sound liquidity management,” 41% of CFOs in Piper Sandler’s survey said their bank would not use BTFP due to the program’s perceived stigma.
Mark Fitzgibbon, managing director and head of financial services research at the firm, believes that the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, may linger in some CFO’s memories; the rules of that program changed when it was amended in 2009 to limit compensation to key executives. He believes that skepticism would be lifted if the Fed would state that the goalposts won’t change with BTFP.
But more importantly, investors would see using the BTFP as a sign of distress. With short sellers targeting regional bank stocks, investors have been jumpy, looking for hints of weakness in a bank’s deposit base.
Placating shareholders may seem like short-term thinking, trading stock price performance for the longevity of the bank — until you consider that flighty depositors could also get spooked. “If the stigma is a concern for depositors,” says Fitzgibbon, “then that could create more of a panic.”
And that can’t be taken lightly.
• Emily McCormick, vice president of editorial & research for Bank Director
|