To move around new supplies of clean energy, from where it's produced to where it's consumed, we need a largely-rebuilt electric grid. How to do this without swamping the household budget and turning monthly electric bills into a giant-sized headache for families and a volatile threat to climate policy -- that is the question.
The new act allows Massachusetts to install the necessary wires, poles, and substations, those sprawling, ugly-looking, but essential collections of gray boxes and transformers you see everywhere.
Importantly, the law aims to offset the future cost of new electric construction by decreasing the future cost of other things. One way to do this is to change state laws that give a special advantage to natural gas as a source of heat for buildings. For decades, in wording buried deep in the statute books, gas companies have enjoyed a competitive edge over other providers of heat. Given the global warming "greenhouse" effect of natural gas, this should go away. Under the new language, no one has to give up the natural gas service they have today. But the laws do become neutral, allowing businesses that sell cleaner alternatives to do so without disadvantage.
Meanwhile, and of special importance to my district, the new law also amends the missions of key state agencies. It revises Massport’s enabling statute, for example, to require the agency to prioritize environmental protection and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions alongside the promotion of commerce and growth.
|