Monday Morning Minute
In This Issue
Firm Locations:  

Chicago Office:
Willis Tower
233 S. Wacker Drive
61st Floor-Suite 6154
Chicago, IL  60606
O. 312.291.8299

Milwaukee Office:
Historic Third Ward
342 N. Water Street
Suite 600
Milwaukee, WI  53202
O. 414.323.6337 

Phoenix Area Admin Office:
36889 N. Tom Darlington Dr.
PO Box 2800-145
Carefree, Arizona 85377
                  June 10, 2019


                                                   Follow us on Twitter Like me on Facebook

The Connecticut House passed a law guaranteeing paid family and medical leave and sent it to the Governor for signing.  It is expected that Governor Ned Lamont will sign it based upon a change in how the program would be administered.  

Some major provisions of the bill are:   
  • State funding of this law will be provided by an employee payroll tax of 0.5%;  
  • Covers private employers with one employee; 
  • Expanding covered FMLA reasons to include caring for grandparents/children, siblings, and those who are equivalent to a family member;
  • Up to 12 weeks paid leave are available for state FMLA covered reasons and under the family violence leave law;
  • employee needs to have worked for the employer for three months and have earned at least $2,325 in a "base period" to be eligible. 
The payroll contributions (employee tax) will begin on January 1, 2021 with the first benefits available under the law on January 1, 2022.

Spognardi Baiocchi LLP will keep you up to date on the Governor's signature on this landmark bill.  Expect it soon. 
The Illinois House and Senate passed a recreational marijuana bill on May 31st. Governor Pritzker has promised to sign the bill. This comes as no surprise for many as he campaigned for office on a legalize marijuana plank. Once he does, Illinois will be the first state to legalize marijuana through the Legislature alone rather than through a voter initiative.
The bill would take effect on January 1st and allow residents over 21 years of age to possess of up to 30 grams. It would also expunge misdemeanors and Class 4 felony marijuana convictions. Governor Pritzker estimates around 800,000 stand-alone low-level drug convictions will be expunged. Government officials hope that through taxation, regulation and other safeguards, a safer market will result. For now, Illinois will focus on small minority business owners to promote entrepreneurship among the marijuana community, instead of allowing large scale commercial growers to take over the industry.
The bill allows employers to maintain a zero tolerance drug free workplace. The bill states that it does not create a cause of action against an employer for reasonable drug and alcohol testing or discipline or termination of an employee for a good faith belief that the employee violated the employer's work place drug policy.
Cultivators and processors would pay 7% of sales to the dispensaries while the consumers will have a 10% sales tax and a 25% sales tax on products that are 35% THC. The tax revenue that is generated will be spread out with 35% going to the state's General Fund, 25% to community reinvestment, 20% to mental health and substance abuse treatment, 10% to state's unpaid bills, 8% to training law enforcement and finally 2% to drug education for the public.
Along with our former partner, Chuck Pautsch, Spognardi Baiocchi LLP was at the forefront of representation of various interests under the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Act. Call any Spognardi Baiocchi attorney if you need help in this area. 

Please see Partner Mark Spognardi's earlier discussion on this:  Click HERE 
Every day our clients confront tough questions regarding their employees' illnesses and injuries and how they impact workplace duties. Some of these are one-time, short term incidents while some are long-term chronic incidents----and many raise questions under ADA, FMLA and workers' compensation, sometimes called the 'Bermuda Triangle' because quite frankly it is easy for employers to make mistakes and get lost in this murky area. Add in collective bargaining agreements and employee benefit plans that must be considered and it's safe to say------Watch out: Danger Ahead!   So last week we set out a quiz to help you test your basic knowledge in this troublesome area.  This week we provide the answers:

1. If an employee is not eligible for FMLA leave, then they need not be considered for leave under ADA. 

FALSE. Probably the most common error that employers make is to consider the two leaves as synonymous. There are many situations where ADA leave must or should be considered as a possible accommodation where the employee is ineligible for FMLA for many reasons-----not eligible because of too few hours worked  in a 12 month period, is a new employee, does not work at a facility that is covered, has used up all of eligible leave, etc. For the ADA eligible and qualified employee coverage is available in all of these circumstances where it can serve as a reasonable accommodation
2. Cancer is a "disability" covered by ADA.

FALSE---- in the sense that it is a flat-out assertion that it is. As terrible of a disease as cancer is, there are cases of cancer that are covered as a "disability" under ADA, while there are cases where it is not. Remember each case is decided on an "individualized assessment" of whether the employee presents with having  "physical or mental impairment or condition" that "substantially limits a major life activity" including "working" or is perceived as having such an impairment or a record of such an impairment.
3. If an employee or applicant is collecting Social Security Disability under the SSDI program they can still make a viable claim under ADA to request or demand a job accommodation. 

TRUE---It is "viable" only in the sense that it is not an automatic bar to such a claim if the employee or applicant can establish reasons or extenuating circumstances why he or she is able to claim that they can do the job in question and also be able to simultaneously claim that they are sufficiently able to meet the SSDI definition of "disability." Not an easy task, but the Supreme Court said they should at least be given a chance to explain why this is not incongruent before their case is dismissed.
4. Congress passed, and the President George H. W. Bush signed into law, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1991 which  defined a "disability" under ADA, the same as the term ---"serious health condition" is defined under the Family and Medical Leave Act. 

FALSE. The terms "disability" and the terms "serious health condition" has vastly different meanings and should be carefully understood before dealing with any potential accommodation issue and especially leave request. There are many differences between the two terms, but the chief among these is that the FMLA term "serious health condition" can and often does cover short-term episodes of illness or injury, while the ADA-covered "disability" does not.
5. If it is obvious that you will not be able to accommodate an employee's or applicant's  clear and obvious disability you need not ask the employee/applicant about ways that you might be able to accommodate it. 

FALSE. This is a significant mistake to make in the accommodation process. Most courts have found that the mere, simple failure to engage in the interactive process of determining whether an accommodation is feasible, or at the end of the analysis----reasonable, is a violation of ADA. Even in jurisdictions which don't find this to be an automatic and separate violation, you will have some severe explaining to do as to why you didn't at least start the interactive process, particularly in termination cases.
6. If an applicant for a job cannot fill in your job application due to a disability, you need not consider them further. 

FALSE.  The need to accommodate disabilities in your work place, as we like to put it, begins at Day Zero----meaning BEFORE the applicant is hired. So if an applicant needs an accommodation during the application process and it can be given without undue hardship, then it should be. The easiest example is an application in braille for an individual with a visual impairment. More difficult questions are being faced in this world of virtual or computer driven hiring.
7. Even if you provide "light duty" for individual employees returning from workers compensation leave, you can maintain a rule which  states that you need not provide it to employees who are injured off the job. 

FALSE. At least without a great degree of scrutiny from the EEOC and plaintiff, who are pressing numerous cases testing this sort of light duty program. The argument they are making is that if the employer can provide such a program for worker compensation claimants in an effort to get them back to gainful employment (and off comp) then it is reasonable to hold that it is reasonable to apply such a program to other workers with a disability.
8. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is a "disability" covered by ADA. 

FALSE---- for the all of the same reasons as set forth in answering #2 above with regard to cancer. It may be and may not be depending on the circumstances.
9. An individual who suffers a severe compound fracture of the arm that completely heals in four months' time is likely to be considered covered by ADAA's definition of "disability". 

TRUE and FALSE------This presents a very close case and we would need more facts (and a judge) to decide whether or not this is a disability. In Summers vs. Altarum, the Fourth Circuit US Court of Appeals wrestled with similar facts involving a severely fractured leg but one that would impact the employee's walking abilities for seven months, instead of being completely healed after four months as in our example. The court held that the employee had a covered disability emphasizing ADAAA's more expansive definition of "disability." Query as to whether this analysis would hold true if the impairment was expected to last less than seven months, given that ADAAA does contain a provision that states that a presumption favoring coverage of a disability starts at the length of six months.
10. It is completely acceptable and a "best practice", to limit all leaves of absence to one(1) year.

FALSE-- It is a particularly dangerous practice as this has become a target for the EEOC's class action program as they are relying on the accepted teaching from the Supreme Court that the assessment of and accommodation for disabilities must be done on an INDIVIDUALIZED basis. The EEOC contends that a "one rule fits all" approach to this violates this fundamental principle of ADA.
As one can see, ADA deals with questions of great importance. Again----Watch out: Danger Ahead! And feel free to call their attorneys at Spognardi Baiocchi LLP with your toughest accommodation problems.

SPOGNARDI BAIOCCHI llp is a law firm dedicated to partnering with companies of all sizes to address the full spectrum of legal concerns for its business.  Our commitment is to find common sense solutions that fit each clients' unique situation to labor, employment, human resources and general business needs. 

With over 50 combined years of experience among its 2 founding partners in these areas, we can assist businesses in developing custom solutions to today's tough issues.  And as litigators, who combined have over thousands of trials  "under their belts" before state and federal courts as well as administrative agencies (such as the NLRB) you will find no better advocate and partner. 


For more information on the firm, please go to our website at or Lisa at