March 2025


From The Certified Elder Law Attorney's Desk:






State of Delaware DMOST Steering Committee Begins Work: February 20, 2025 Meeting.









By:

Catherine Read


Blog Spotlight:



Living Arrangements for Our Adult Children






By: William W. Erhart


March 19th, 2025




Calendar of Events



Article of Interest:






At 95, He’s the World’s Oldest Speedskater. He’s Gunning for 100.


Iichi Marumo started competing in his late 80s, after a life spent farming, publishing poetry and volunteering to fly in a kamikaze mission during World War II.








By Martin Fackler and Hisako Ueno

Reporting from Chino, Japan for the New York Times

March 16, 2025













Quote


From The Certified Elder Law

Attorney's Desk:


State of Delaware DMOST Steering Committee Begins Work:  

February 20, 2025 Meeting 



By: Catherine Read

On February 20, 2025, Delaware’s newly established DMOST Steering Committee held its first meeting to begin carrying out its statutory mandate to study and improve implementation of the DMOST Act and make recommendations for statutory and regulatory improvements to the Act. I am honored to represent the Elder Law Section of the Delaware State Bar Association on the DMOST Steering Committee. This article explains what DMOST and the DMOST Steering Committee are and provides report from the first meeting.  

What is DMOST

DMOST is the acronym for Delaware’s statute, 16 Del. C. Chapter 25A, “Delaware Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment Act.” 


Let’s start with what DMOST is not.  


DMOST is not a health care power of attorney or advance directive, which are governed by a different statute, 16 Del. C. Chapter 25 (a new version of which replaces the current statute on September 30, 2025). Attorneys prepare health care powers of attorney and advance directives, or the statutory form can be used (though we do not recommend it). These documents appoint an agent to make a health care decision for you if you lack capacity and, if desired, express instructions for the care you wish your agent to select for you if you lack capacity. Anyone with legal capacity can sign these documents. No physician signature or counseling is required.  


DMOST is not a do not resuscitate (DNR) order, which is an order written by a physician, prohibiting resuscitation of a patient by health care professionals in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest that ordinarily would require resuscitation efforts. Because the "DNR" is a physician's order (and prerogative), it cannot be incorporated into an advance directive document by the patient. The patient can, however, express his or her preference regarding resuscitation in an advance directive. A patient’s agent under an advance directive can request that a physician enter a DNR order.  


Enter POLST and Delaware’s DMOST.  


In an effort to standardize the use and understanding of DNR and similar orders, a number of states implemented a different approach to the withholding of life-sustaining treatment. The "Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment" (POLST) movement attempts to engage physicians and patients in discussion, understanding and commitment of the patient and medical community to honoring patient wishes on end-of-life care. The format of these various programs typically includes a standardized form (often with a distinctive color) addressing DNR orders, feeding tube placement, and antibiotics, among other treatment options. Details about the national POLST movement are reported online at http://www.polst.org.  


Delaware’s version of the POLST paradigm is called DMOST – Delaware Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment. 16 Del. C. Ch. 25A. The statute enacting DMOST was passed in May, 2015, which became effective in 2016. DMOST provides a single document that functions as an actionable medical order and transitions with a patient through all health care settings in order to clearly indicate their wishes for life-sustaining treatment and CPR.  

The DMOST is a process and is executed after discussion with the patient or the patient’s authorized representative. 16 Del. C. § 2509A (3). 


Therefore, DMOST is not a document one gets at an attorney’s office. One gets a DMOST at the physician’s office. 


DMOST is a process where the patient (or his or her authorized representative) and the Physician, Advance Practice Registered Nurse, or Physician Assistant together review the patient’s medical condition and titrate the directions for end-of-life care to the patient’s medical condition.  


DMOST cannot be executed by just any patient (or authorized representative). The patient must be a “living with serious illness or frailty whose health care practitioner would not be surprised if the patient died within the next year.” 16 Del. C. § 2503A.  


One must use the standard form required by statute, unlike a health care power of attorney or advance directive which statutory form is optional. The DMOST form is promulgated by State regulation. 16 Del. C. § 2505A; 16 DE Admin. Code 4304, 4.5: “Only the DMOST form in these regulations, which contains a watermark, can be recognized as a DMOST form.” 


The DMOST is revocable by the patient (and even by his or her authorized representative if the patient lacks capacity) because under constitutional law one has a right of self-determination.  


DMOST is to be posted in a person’s home in a prominent place and travel with the patient from home through all health-care settings. DMOST is also to be saved to central repository that any health-care setting can access.  


What is the DMOST Steering Committee

The DMOST Steering Committee was created as part of Senate Bill No. 195, which became effective September 26, 2034. The new legislation amended the DMOST Act to establish a DMOST Program at the at the Department of Health and Social Services (“DHSS”) and a DMOST Steering Committee to address shortcomings in DMOST and its implementation.  


The Bill Synopsis noted the DMOST is being underutilized, despite efforts by advocates and the creation of a statewide, electronic registry for DMOST forms hosted by the Delaware Health Information Network (DHIN).  


In the original 2016 DMOST Act, there was no fiscal note for a DMOST Coordinator employment position or for education programs.  


To remedy this, with Senate Bill No. 195 came a Fiscal Note authorizing a full-time DMOST Coordinator position within DHSS and establishing a $50,000 annual contractual funding for education programs.  


As part of program coordination, the DMOST Coordinator will oversee the maintenance of a new website and will be responsible for working with DHIN to maintain an electronic registry.  


As provided in the Bill Synopsis, the new legislation expands on DHSS’s current DMOST responsibilities to include: 

  1. Providing ongoing education and training for health-care practitioners and providers, emergency care providers, patients, and their families. 
  2. Maintaining a website for information and education about DMOST. 
  3. Working with the DHIN to maintain the electronic registry. 
  4. Coordinating with the National POLST Collaborative regarding current best practices and research.  
  5. Creating an 11-member DMOST Steering Committee, consisting of a broad group of stakeholders, to evaluate and improve the DMOST Program and use of DMOST forms. The DMOST Steering Committee must produce an annual report containing data about: a) the use of DMOST forms, b) trainings, c) public education and outreach, and d) current challenges and recommendations to improve the DMOST Program.  


New Section 2521A of the DMOST Act creates the DMOST Steering Committee to support implementation of the DMOST program and make recommendations to improve implementation.  


The Committee is comprised of the following 11 members, or a designee selected by the member serving by virtue of position, and shall meet not less than once every 4 months:   

(1) The President, Delaware Quality of Life Coalition, who serves as chair. 

(2) The Secretary of DHSS. 

(3) Chief Executive Officer, Delaware Health Information Network. 

(4) The Delaware representative to the National Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Coalition. 

(5) The Long-Term Care Ombudsperson under subchapter VI of Chapter 11 of Title 16. 

(6) The Executive Director, Delaware State Fire Prevention Commission. 

(7) The Chief Executive Officer, Delaware Healthcare Association. 

(8) The Executive Director, Delaware Health Care Facilities Association. 

(9) The Chair, Elder Law Section, Delaware State Bar Association. 

(10) One member representing a health-care insurance provider, appointed by the Secretary. 

(11) One member of the public, appointed by the Secretary of DHSS. 


What are the DMOST Steering Committee Goals


The Committee’s goals are articulated in new Section 2521A(d). The Committee shall produce an annual report, published on the DMOST Program website, that includes all of the following:  

(1) Data regarding all of the following: 

a. The number of DMOST forms in the electronic registry. 

b. How often the electronic registry is consulted by health-care providers. 

c. Use of DMOST forms by emergency-care providers. 

(2) Information about trainings provided to health-care practitioners, health-care providers, and emergency-care providers. 

(3) Public education and outreach efforts. 

(4) Current challenges and recommendations to improve the DMOST Program and the use of DMOST forms.

 

Report from First Meeting of the DMOST Steering Committee 


The first meeting of the DMOST Steering Committee was held in hybrid format in person at the Herman M. Holloway Sr. Health and Social Services Campus and virtually. Led by Dr. Sarah Matthews, M.D., at the meeting the following topics were covered: 

  1. Overview of the DMOST program and SB 195. 
  2. Vendor Support. Vendor contracts will be needed for education and awareness.  
  3. DMOST Coordinator. The DHSS internal approval process for creation of the new position is underway, and until completed, two individuals working within DHSS will perform the DMOST Coordinator position.  
  4. DHIN and Electronic Registry. DHIN maintains the registry but few health care providers use it. This is a serious hurdle to DMOST’s purposes and a core mission of the Steering Committee to resolve. DHIN seeks connection to the larger health care system. 
  5. DMOST Form:  
  6. Updates to form. The Committee will study forms that are successful in other states to consider changes to our form. One issue is non-English translations. A broader, deeper issuer is readability and understandability for all involved. A specific issue relates to Part E of the DMOST form which permits an Authorized Representative (a term undefined in the DMOST form itself) to complete and sign the DMOST form on behalf of the patient. There is confusion over this provision. For these and other reasons, the Committee is considering aligning the form more to the national POLST form which has been updated in the last few years. The Committee will review, and considering shifting to, the more modern national POLST form. Changing the form requires not a statutory change but a regulation change, as in the original 2016 legislation the drafters took the form out of the statute and put it in the regulations just for this purpose – ease of updating.  
  7. Coordination with Emergency Medical Service Personnel. The DMOST form is to be in a pink envelope posted on the patient’s refrigerator or bed so the EMS professionals can see it. However, when EMS responds to a call away from someone’s home – such as a car accident – that envelope is back at the home. This is why the registry is needed with EMS access to it. 
  8. Interoperability with acute care systems. This is a major obstacle to DMOST implementation. Each acute care system in Delaware has its own DMOST registry. This means when one travels to a different health system, that DMOST is trapped back in the former system’s registry. Likewise, DMOST forms often do not travel out of the health care system back to the patient’s home post-discharge. Importantly, this issue is not limited to acute care settings. A process and registry are needed for Long-Term Care Facilities and In-Home providers to use and access.  
  9. Education and Awareness. These are necessary for DMOST implementation as lack of awareness and misinformation abound not only among consumers but in the health care industry.  
  10. Data Collection. This is necessary to track and report progress in the Committee’s efforts.  


What Comes Next


At least for now, the DMOST Steering Committee is meeting monthly to get a good start on the substantial work to be done. The next meeting is scheduled for March 20, 2025 at 3:00 p.m., which is public, and posted with information to attend in-person or virtually (should you wish to attend), at the State of Delaware Public Meeting Calendar: https://publicmeetings.delaware.gov/#/meeting/81703.  


At the first meeting, the Committee noted the significant changes in the new Uniform Health-care Decisions Act (2023), which goes into effect September 30, 2025, and asked its effect on the DMOST Act, particularly as to the capacity to make a DMOST. I will be presenting on this important topic at the March 20 meeting.  


Living Arrangements for Our Adult Children



By: William "Bill" W. Erhart

March 19th, 2025


Who Will Care for Our Child?


Anne and Bill have an adult child who lives with them. Their forty-five-year-old Charles has significant intellectual and developmental disabilities (“IDD”). Charles does not mix well with others. He has lived in the family residence all forty-five years. Anne and Bill will leave a lot of money in the trust created for Charles upon their deaths. But a financial analysis shows that the $3 million will not sustain the house in the trust and Charles’ needs over his lifetime.


Being thinking people, the parents’ concept is to have the residence left in trust and be leased to the State for a group home so Charles can continue to live in the only home he has known. They are willing to make whatever modifications to the home may be required for State approval. Assets of the parents will be in trust for Charles. Charles will be eligible for public benefits, including Medicaid. There are some public benefits that pay for group homes.


Pretty Good Plan. Yes?


Issue: If a resident of a group home is disruptive or is not suited for the other residents, it is the disruptive resident that moves into another home. Anne and Bill do not want Charles to ever have to leave the family home. How do they cut a deal with the State that if Charles is disruptive, the other resident(s) have to move to another home? Will the State move three instead of one? What if Charles never adjusts to other residents?


Again, being thinking people, Anne and Bill consider that perhaps a private non-profit that provided housing for those with IDD may be willing to lease the home, but agree to keep Charles in the home no matter what.


But it is the same issue. Many non-profits receive significant funding from Medicaid and other governmental programs. The regulations are strict. And, even without rules, it could be tough to find a non-profit that will move one resident let alone multiple because Charles may be difficult.


Solution?


Really there is not a good one in this circumstance where the parents want to preserve the continuity of keeping a child in one place. If for no other reason that, even with compatible residents, there may be lots of reasons Charles may have to move. From the trauma of a fire to maintenance of the home that is not cost efficient, there are many reasons why Charles may no longer be able to live in the home because of his IDD.


One has to plan that Charles may have to move.


But parents always want control. And they always want a home where their kid will not get kicked out.


But where? Sometimes parents build an option.


Intentional Communities


Intentional Communities are planned communities where residents have commonality. They tend to be private pay. There is government support for some.


How Are They Formed?


Families with children with disabilities see one another. Their kids go to school together, summer camp, and play together. They talk about doctors, social workers, support for their children, themselves, and programs for the kids. And what to do for their children when they cannot assist them. Where will my child live? Who will care for them? Will they be alright? And they discuss where and how will they live.


Parents get together, learn, and plan. One plan is the intentional community.


How are they formed? In the past, a group of families get together. They decide to build something.


They can be in rural settings, suburbs, apartment, and condominium settings.


Financing is only one of the obstacles.


The process can be overwhelming. The licensing, zoning, and regulatory process is enormous.

Prior to 2014, building an intentional community was difficult. Until 2019, any public funding for these communities was sparse.


In support of treating disabled citizens like all citizens, in 2014 the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued Medicaid regulations for the Home and Community-Based Services (“HCBS”) waiver which pays for support services for long-term care recipients who are not in institutions.


The principle is that Medicaid dollars should be spent in a person-centered manner, not a setting which is institutional or isolating.


According to CMS, there should be no Medicaid benefits to support farmsteads, gated or secured communities, residential schools, or co-located and operationally related settings.


The fear is that these were covers or will lead to institutions.


In March 2019, the list of presumptively isolating factors was eliminated. Communities for residents with similar concerns and interests became eligible for federal assistance. What is known as the HCBS Setting Rule is to ensure that people who receive services and support through Medicaid HCBS programs have full access to community living and are able to receive services in the most integrated setting.


The principle that those with disabilities is to be treated like everyone else is not discarded with intentional communities for those with disabilities. We have over 55 communities specifically for people who choose to age among a population with similar needs and concerns. Freedom to choose is an important right for the disabled.



CONTINUE READING HERE

CLICK HERE TO ACCESS ALL OF THE EAELS BLOGS






  • April 1: April Fool's Day
  • April 7: World Health Day
  • April 15: Tax Day
  • April 18: Good Friday
  • April 20: Easter Sunday


At 95, He’s the World’s Oldest Speedskater. He’s Gunning for 100.


Iichi Marumo started competing in his late 80s, after a life spent farming, publishing poetry and volunteering to fly in a kamikaze mission during World War II.



By Martin Fackler and Hisako Ueno

Reporting from Chino, Japan for the New York Times

March 16, 2025


When Iichi Marumo competed in his first international race seven years ago in Moscow, the Japanese speedskater moved down the ice at about the pace of a brisk jog. It took him three times as long to cross the finish line as most of the other skaters that day.


It didn’t matter, because Mr. Marumo was also three times as old. He was 88, and his time was still fast enough to earn him a silver medal in his age category of 85 and up.


Ever since, he has won only gold. Now 95, in his most recent race, a national competition in Japan in January, he competed in a category that was created just for him: 95 and over.

So far, he has the category all to himself.


“I win a gold medal every time I appear,” Mr. Marumo said in an interview at his home in Chino, a small city in the rugged mountains of central Honshu, Japan’s main island. As proof, he pulled out a plastic shopping bag filled with more than 20 gold medals, including from races in the Netherlands and Canada.


A small man with slightly bowed legs and an impish smile, Mr. Marumo has been skating his whole life, but he began his competitive career at an age when most people would feel lucky to still be alive. On his wall, plaques from Guinness proclaim him to be the world’s oldest male competitive speedskater. His closest rival is a Norwegian skater who is five years younger. (The oldest currently active female competitor is an 80-year-old Dutch skater.)


The collection caps a remarkable near-century of life. Mr. Marumo survived World War II despite volunteering to fly a kamikaze mission, was awarded by Japan’s emperor for teaching other farmers how to profit by growing celery, and he publishes a short monthly magazine dedicated to traditional Japanese poetry.


Click here to finish reading.
Facebook  Linkedin