Issue 515A - June 5, 2021
CORRECTION: This issue of the newsletter contains the name of the author of the Delaware Marijuana Control Act opinion column. This information was mistakenly omitted from the version distributed last evening. We apologize for the oversight.
Legislature Begins its Final Month Next Week
x
  • Marijuana Legalization and Absentee Voting Bills Slated for Debate on Thursday

  • Legislative Hall Partially Reopens to the Public
House Schedule for Next Week

  • Tuesday, June 8 - Session begins 2 p.m.
  • Wednesday, June 9 - Virtual Committees/No Session
  • Thursday, June 10 - Session begins 2 p.m.

Click here to see the House Agenda for Tuesday, June 8. Tuesday's Agenda includes House Bill 100, which seeks to establish a mental health services unit for Delaware elementary schools. 

The House Agenda for Thursday, June 10 includes two high-profile bills:

  • House Bill 75: The second leg of a proposed constitutional amendment, this bill seeks to remove language concerning limitations on absentee balloting. The measure would also empower the General Assembly to enact new laws on absentee balloting by simple statute. As a proposed amendment, the bill requires a two-thirds (66.6%) majority for passage.

  • House Bill 150: Also known as the Delaware Marijuana Control Act, this legislation seeks to legalize recreational marijuana in The First State. Because the bill would create new taxes and fees, it requires a three-fifths (60%) majority for passage.
_________________________

Limited Public Seating at Legislative Hall

For the first time since January 2020, the public will again be allowed into Legislative Hall during session, albeit in a limited fashion. The plan, authored by the Democratic leaders of the House of Representatives and Senate, does the following:

  • 25 seats in the House gallery and 25 seats in the Senate gallery (50 seats total) will be made available to members of the public each session day.
  •  Members of the public will be able to reserve seats on the Delaware General Assembly website.
  • The House and Senate will use separate online sign-up forms.
  • The sign-up forms will be available starting at 5 p.m. the evening before each session day.
  • Members of the public will be required to provide their full name and email address to reserve a seat. Confirmation of a seat reservation will be emailed using the address provided.
  • Sign-up opportunities will close once all available seats have been reserved or 10 a.m. the following morning, whichever comes first.
  • Capitol Police will be provided with the names of individuals who have reserved a seat in each chamber.
  • Members of the public will not be able to sign up more than once each day. Individuals will be limited to once seat per person per day. No seating will be available to anyone who arrives at Legislative Hall without a reservation.
  • Doors to Legislative Hall will open 30 minutes before each chamber convenes session on a given day. Attendees will be directed up the main staircase (or to the nearest elevator) and to their respective gallery. They will be asked to leave once session is completed.
  • Members of the public must wear masks at all times while in Legislative Hall, as with all other state government buildings.
  • In order to accommodate as many Delawareans as possible, members of the public are encouraged to sign up to observe only one chamber each day.
VIDEO:
Measure Seeks to Prevent Denial of Services Based on COVID-19 Vaccine Status
Click above to watch video.

JUNE 4, 2021 -- A measure introduced in the State House of Representatives on Thursday would prohibit the denial of rights and services to citizens based on their COVID-19 vaccination status.

“No one should be coerced into having a vaccine injected into their body,” said State Rep. Rich Collins (R-Millsboro), the prime sponsor of the bill.

Some opinion leaders have suggested that requiring proof of vaccination to engage in certain activities or receive services should be used as leverage to push reluctant citizens into getting immunized. Rep. Collins counters that such an approach would ride roughshod over citizens’ most basic rights. 

“There are some people that may have religious objections,” Rep. Collins said. “Others may believe that the vaccine poses a bigger threat than contracting the virus. In any case, our citizens have the right of self-determination, the right to worship as they see fit, and the expectation that their health care privacy will be respected. My bill seeks to safeguard these citizens’ protections as it relates to the administration of the vaccine.”

Rep. Collins also noted that the heavy hand of government is not needed when it comes to ensuring the vaccine reaches enough people to achieve “herd immunity” – a threshold of resistance to the virus in the overall population that will prevent the contagion from spreading freely.

According to a Pew Research Center survey, “around seven-in-ten U.S. adults (69%) said in mid-February that they would definitely or probably get a coronavirus vaccine.” In Delaware, those age 65 and over – the demographic segment in which 83% of all fatalities have occurred – is more than 81% fully inoculated. The next highest-risk group (50 to 64 years-old), accounting for another 14% of all fatalities, is 55% fully vaccinated.

The legislation (House Bill 209) would apply to any order issued by the governor under his ongoing State of Emergency declaration. It would also encompass any state agency, as well as any county or municipal government or other entity receiving at least $10 million in annual state funding, such as DelTech, the University of Delaware, and Delaware State University. 

Any individual or organization covered by the bill could “not adopt or issue a regulation, ordinance, law, order, or similar policy that requires an individual to undergo medical vaccination against COVID-19, or prove that the individual has been vaccinated against COVID-19, to exercise a lawful right or receive a benefit or service that is available to the public.”

The measure does not deal with the issue of whether businesses can require vaccinations as a condition of employment. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), it is unclear if any of the COVID vaccines being administered in the U.S. can be mandated since all the formulations were approved by the Food and Drug Administration under an Emergency Use Authorization. “To date, at least one federal lawsuit (Legaretta v. Macias) has been filed challenging an employer’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate on the grounds that vaccines are still under emergency use authorization,” a recent KFF report stated.

“My bill is an attempt to provide clarity in Delaware as it applies to the specific entities covered in the legislation,” Rep. Collins said.

Should the bill become law, it will sunset (expire) one year following its enactment.
OPINION:
If We Are Going to Have a Recreational Marijuana Bill, Can It at Least be a Good One?  
NOTE: The Delaware Marijuana Control Act is expected to be debated by the
State House of Representatives on Thursday, June 10.

By State Rep. Jeff Spiegelman

One of the most interesting debates in modern America right now is whether to legalize recreational marijuana use.  
 
States that have done so point to increases in revenue; fairer drug laws; and the ability of police to utilize resources where they are better needed. Opponents of the idea are concerned about intoxicated drivers and workers as there still is no instant test for active cannabis in a person’s system; the threat of legalizing what some consider to be a gateway drug; and the danger of having an increase in the substance around children who might accidentally gain access to it.
 
Having heard this debate in the General Assembly before, I was persuaded to previously vote YES on a bill that eventually did not pass in 2018. Now, fast-forwarding to this year’s General Assembly, we are again faced with the question of whether to legalize recreational marijuana use.

I am sure many of you have strong opinions one way or another on some of the things I have mentioned. But, one aspect of this that is often lost in the debate is whether the bill to legalize marijuana is a well-written measure. We must ask ourselves: Will the legislation accomplish the task for which it is intended? Is it as well-suited as possible to prevent unforeseen consequences? Is it good, safe, and fair for the state and the people we serve? 
The measure before the legislature – House Bill 150 – is not a well-written bill that I can vote for as I had done previously.

For the moment, let’s put aside which side of the fence you may be on as it pertains to legalization itself and specifically address the numerous concerns with the legislation as currently written:
 
  • The bill – in its current form – creates an ultra-competitive licensing procedure whereby an applicant’s ability to run a successful business is never questioned. In fact, the bill does not even require an applicant to submit a business plan. However, it does grant extra points in the scoring system based on the applicant's demographics. In the name of granting licenses to what the bill refers to as “social equity applicants,” it goes even so far as to give preferential treatment to someone who has a prior conviction for the delivery of drugs. No business plan is required; But, if you have a criminal record for being a drug dealer, we will move you right to the front of the line to get a license over someone with a business plan and no prior convictions. 

  • The bill – in its current form – says organized labor must be used in the construction and renovations of all facilities that will sell, grow, or test marijuana. Union labor makes up about only 25% of the state’s labor force. Regardless of your political views on organized labor, don’t you think it will cause a MASSIVE logjam to say that 75% of the labor in the state is not allowed to work on the infrastructure needed for the industry? 

  • The bill – in its current form – grants wide sweeping authority to regulatory agencies to pretty much do as they please when it comes to growing marijuana. We already have too much regulatory authority invested in the bureaucracy to have their power over this industry go unchecked. For those of you on the pro-recreational marijuana side, this means an anti-marijuana governor could make the industry nearly impossible to succeed due to regulation.  

  • The bill – in its current form – has a very confusing section about being intoxicated while on the job. There are industries in which having marijuana in your system while working could be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. With how little we know about how marijuana affects one physically and mentally, do we really want – as just one logical example – brain surgeons to have marijuana in their system while at work?  

  • The bill – in its current form – does not allow the three counties in Delaware to craft ordinances about the marijuana industry one way or another. Only the municipalities are granted the authority to allow or not allow marijuana businesses in their jurisdictions. So, if you wanted to open a marijuana store or farm in Delaware, the counties have no authority to allow that in their county code.  

I could go on, but I think you get the idea at this point. We can have the debate about legalizing or not legalizing marijuana for recreational use based on the merits of the idea. I am happy to have that debate. I think it is a healthy debate to have. What I will not do, however, is vote for a bill that is this poorly written. 

As I have been doing since the legislation was first introduced in March, I will continue to try to convince the sponsor to address these significant concerns. However, I need your help. I encourage you to contact your elected officials and ask them to make the changes necessary to HB 150 to make it safer and fairer all around. 
NEWS:
Weekly Update Continues Downward
COVID-19 Trends
The Delaware Division of Public Health (DPH) weekly update shows continued downward trends regarding the incidence of COVID-19 in The First State.
 
  • A total of 109,005 positive cases of COVID-19 among Delaware residents have been reported to DPH.

  • The seven-day average of new positive cases decreased to 48.4 on June 3 -- down from 72.7 a week earlier.
 
  • As of June 1, the seven-day average for the percentage of total tests that were positive was 2.0%, a decrease from 2.7% as of Tuesday, May 25. (There is a two-day lag for presenting data related to this metric to account for the delay between the date of the test and when the DPH receives the result).
 
  • 51 individuals are currently hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Delaware, down 11 from this time last week. Five of the hospitalized persons are critically ill, down four from last week.

  • Thus far, 47.6% of Delawareans age 12 and over have been fully vaccinated. Nearly 82% of the demographic group in which 83% of COVID-19 fatalities have occurred (age 65 and above) is fully vaccinated.