|
ARTICLES & OBSERVATIONS
The Troubled Energy Transition by Daniel Yergin, Peter Orszag, and Atul Arya: Amid geopolitical distractions, it’s easy to overlook the ongoing global energy transition. This Foreign Affairs article provides an excellent overview of past energy shifts, assesses our current one, and forecasts the road ahead. Here are the points I think you’ll find interesting:
Historical Pattern: Past energy transitions added new sources rather than replacing old ones. No energy source has ever declined globally in absolute terms.
Energy Addition: Renewables are growing alongside fossil fuels, not displacing them—hydrocarbons still account for 80% of global energy!
Financial Burden: Transitioning to cleaner tech could cost $6.3-6.7 trillion annually by 2030, about 5% of global GDP.
North-South Divide: Developing nations are balancing economic growth with climate goals, while up to three billion people still lack electricity.
Mineral Constraints: Critical minerals for renewables face supply shortages, long mine approval processes, and local resistance. (This is one reason we’re invested in copper!)
Geopolitical Tensions: China dominates mineral processing and renewable manufacturing, while the U.S. counters with protectionist measures.
Electricity Demand: Surging needs from electric vehicles, manufacturing, and data centres are straining grids and complicating decarbonization.
Pragmatic Path: A realistic way forward will involve trade-offs, diversified supply chains, and sustained investment in conventional energy during the transition.
As investors, we must recognize that despite the rapid growth and falling costs of green tech, fossil fuels will remain essential for the foreseeable future. The economic rise of developing nations is too fast for renewables alone to keep up.
International Fund Flows
Why do investments increase in value? The cheeky answer is “more buyers than sellers.” But where do these buyers—and their money—come from? This often-overlooked question could have major implications in the months and years ahead.
It’s no secret that U.S. stock markets have vastly outperformed the rest of the world. Why? American companies, on average, have been more profitable, efficient, and innovative than their global peers.
This success has drawn investors worldwide, pushing U.S. markets higher. Strong corporate profits and growth have fuelled even more investment, creating a virtuous cycle.
Let’s look at some numbers.
At the end of 2009, the net international investment position (NIIP) in U.S. stocks was $2.6 trillion. By Q3 2024, foreign investment had soared to an astonishing $23.6 trillion—that’s $23,600,000,000,000!
But with an expensive U.S. market heavily reliant on international funds, many of us are asking: what happens if the U.S. underperforms? Especially if other markets regain momentum. Consider the following:
- India, with the world’s largest population, young demographics, and fifth-largest economy, is expected to grow its GDP by 6-7% over the next few years.
-
China leads in green tech, robotics, and rare earths, and its economy, buoyed by government stimulus, is rebounding from a rough COVID response and property crash. (See last month’s letter for more on China.)
- Emerging markets, particularly in Asia, are poised for significant growth this decade.
- Europe might finally get its act together. With Trump’s new geopolitical stance and the Ukraine conflict, expect increased spending on defence and infrastructure, plus efforts to cut red tape which has stifled innovation.
- In Canada, the “Maple Eight” pension funds hold nearly 40% of their assets in U.S. securities. Fallout from the trade war has increased pressure to bring some of those funds home.
- The longer the trade war persists, the more it could dent U.S. corporate profits—and stock prices.
Consider this: the U.S. all-cap market is down 2.5% in 2025, while the tech-heavy NASDAQ has fallen twice as much. Meanwhile, China’s undervalued market has risen strongly this year, but remains 20% below its all-time highs. Europe is also strongly in positive territory this year.
It’s too soon to call this a major shift, but the conditions are ripe. In the eight weeks since Trump took office, his brash rhetoric—belittling allies and hinting at territorial ambitions—feels like a potential game-changer.
|