Media Advisory
January 28, 2019
Contact: Randolph May at 202-285-9926

The Federalist Society Review has just published an article by Free State Foundation President Randolph May and Senior Fellow Seth Cooper titled "John Marshall’s Jurisprudence Supports Preemption of California's Net Neutrality Law."

On February 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will hold oral argument on the appeal challenging the FCC's January 2018 Restoring Internet Freedom Order (RIF Order) . The RIF Order reversed the Obama Administration's FCC's action which had subjected Internet service providers to heavy-handed public utility-like regulation. The RIF Order substituted a light-touch, deregulatory regime, and the FCC asserted its authority to preempt state laws, like California's, which conflicted with the federal deregulatory policy.

In their Federalist Society Review article , May and Cooper show that Chief Justice John Marshall's Commerce Clause jurisprudence in his famous Gibbons v. Ogden opinion supports the FCC's assertion of authority to preempt conflicting state neutrality laws.

Here are the first two paragraphs of the article:

"It may be hard to see a connection between steamboats plowing the waterways of our early republic and today’s high-speed broadband networks carrying the bits and bytes of internet transmissions. But there is a jurisprudential connection between Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1824 decision in  Gibbons v. Ogden  and the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC or Commission) 2018 assertion of authority to preempt state laws interfering with interstate internet traffic. In  Gibbons , Marshall established federal supremacy under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause to preempt a New York law that interfered with steamboat traffic between New York and New Jersey. Marshall determined that the New York law conflicted with a congressional act licensing coastal steamboat traffic, and that it therefore could not be enforced. As Marshall famously put it: 'Congress may control state laws so far as it may be necessary to control them for the regulation of commerce.'
Gibbons often is considered one of Chief Justice Marshall’s three most important opinions. So it’s worth considering the relevance of the Great Expounder’s  Gibbons opinion even to a matter as utterly contemporary, and as important to interstate commerce, as today’s internet. First, we will examine the FCC’s January 2018  Restoring Internet Freedom Order —in which it asserted preemptive authority to invalidate state laws in conflict with the agency’s declared internet policy—and California’s reaction to the order. Then, we will show how the foundation laid in  Gibbons , where Marshall was faced with incompatible federal and state laws, buttresses the current FCC’s authority to keep the internet free from conflicting state regulation."

The complete article, with footnotes, may be accessed here .

* * *
Randolph J. Ma y, President of the Free State Foundation, is a former FCC Associate General Counsel and a former Chairman of the American Bar Association's Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice. Mr. May is a past Public Member and a current Senior Fellow of the Administrative Conference of the United States, and a Fellow at the National Academy of Public Administration.
Mr. May is a nationally recognized expert in communications law, Internet law and policy, and administrative law and regulatory practice. He is the author of more than 200 scholarly articles and essays on communications law and policy, administrative law, and constitutional law. Most recently, Mr. May is the co-author, with FSF Senior Fellow Seth Cooper, of the recently released A Reader on Net Neutrality and Restoring Internet Freedom and #CommActUpdate - A Communications Law Fit for the Digital Age as well as The Constitutional Foundations of Intellectual Property , and is the editor of the book Communications Law and Policy in the Digital Age: The Next Five Years . He is the author of A Call for a Radical New Communications Policy: Proposals for Free Market Reform . And he is the editor of the book, New Directions in Communications Policy and co-editor of other two books on communications law and policy: Net Neutrality or Net Neutering: Should Broadband Internet Services Be Regulated and Communications Deregulation and FCC Reform .

Seth L. Cooper  is a Senior Fellow at The Free State Foundation. He previously served as the Telecommunications and Information Technology Task Force Director at the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), as a Washington State Supreme Court judicial clerk and as a state senate caucus staff counsel. He is an attorney, and he graduated from Seattle University School of Law with honors. Mr. Cooper's work has appeared in such publications as  CommLaw Conspectus , the  Gonzaga Law Review , the  San Jose Mercury News , the  Des Moines Register , the  Baltimore Sun , the  Washington Examiner , the  Washington Times , and  The Hill .
The Free State Foundation's newest book A Reader on Net Neutrality and Restoring Internet Freedom , by Randolph May and Seth Cooper, is available from Amazon  here  in paperback for $9.95 or for your Kindle  here  for $2.99. And it is available  here  from Apple and other booksellers in various e-book formats for $2.99 or less. Read more about the book  here .
By the way, when you are shopping for books or other items on Amazon, please login through AmazonSmile here . If you do so, Amazon will donate 0.5% of the price of your purchases to the Free State Foundation. We know that it is a small donation, but every little bit helps to support our work!
A Free Market Think Tank for Maryland......Because Ideas Matters and FSF are registered trademarks of the Free State Foundation.
All trademark and copyright rights are reserved.