American Minute with Bill Federer
Modern Space Flight: Robert Goddard & Wernher von Braun
|
|
The
"Father of Modern Rocketry"
was American scientist
Robert H. Goddard
.
He ushered in the
"Space Age"
by creating the world's first liquid-fueled rocket.
|
|
Goddard
was born in 1882 and raised Episcopalian.
He wrote of a pivotal moment when he was 17-years-old, after having read H.G. Wells' 1897 science-fiction novel
War of the Worlds:
"On the afternoon of October 19, 1899, I climbed a tall cherry tree and, armed with a saw which I still have, and a hatchet, started to trim the dead limbs from the cherry tree.
|
|
... It was one of the quiet, colorful afternoons of sheer beauty which we have in October in New England, and as I looked towards ... the east, I imagined how wonderful it would be to make some device which had even the possibility of ascending to Mars.
I was a different boy when I descended the tree from when I ascended for existence at last seemed very purposive ..."
|
|
He continued:
"The dream would not down ... for even though I reasoned with myself that the thing was impossible, there was something inside which simply would not stop working."
|
|
In 1919, he published a ground-breaking work titled
"A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes,"
where a rocket would be guided by a gyroscope connected to steerable thrust to provide three-axis control.
In 1924, he married
Esther Christine Kisk
at St. John's Episcopal Church in Worcester, Massachusetts. She faithfully assisted him as his secretary, recording his research and applying for patents.
|
|
Goddard's
team launched 34 different rockets between 1926 and 1941, setting records of 550 miles an hour and an altitude of 1.6 miles.
He received funding from
Charles Lindbergh
and the
Guggenheim family.
|
|
The press ridiculed him during his life, as
Ronald Reagan
explained to the
National Space Club,
March 29, 1985:
"In
Dr. Goddard's
case,
The New York Times
claiming rockets would never work in the vacuum of space
ridiculed his effort.
'He only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools,' the
Times
editorialized."
|
|
Only after the successful launch of Apollo 11, decades after
Goddard's
death, did
The New York Times
published a short correction, July 17, 1969:
"Further investigation and experimentation have confirmed ... that a rocket can function in a vacuum as well as in an atmosphere.
The Times
regrets the error."
|
|
After his death in 1945, appreciation for
Goddard's
work increased so much so that
NASA
named the
Goddard Space Flight Center
after him in 1959. He was posthumously inducted into the
International Aerospace Hall of Fame,
1966, and the
International Space Hall of Fame,
1976.
|
|
Robert Goddard
stated:
- "Every vision is a joke until the first man accomplishes it; once realized, it becomes commonplace."
- It is difficult to say what is impossible, for the dream of yesterday is the hope of today and the reality of tomorrow."
- "Set goals, challenge yourself, and achieve them. Live a healthy life ... and make every moment count. Rise above the obstacles, and focus on the positive."
|
|
President Reagan
continued his address to the
National Space Club,
March 29, 1985:
"Personally, I like space. The higher you go, the smaller the Federal Government looks ..."
|
|
He continued:
"Robert Goddard,
our
American rocket pioneer
... exemplified the ingenuity, the perseverance of individuals who make lasting contributions to their fellow countrymen and to mankind.
Dr. Goddard
persevered for decades of intense research and development. ...
|
|
... But due to the efforts of
Dr. Goddard
and other individuals of vision and tenacity, America is now on the edge of a new era.
By standing on the shoulders of giants like
Robert Goddard
, this generation is moving forward to harness the enormity of space in the preservation of peace ...
American freedom was once protected by musket and ball. Today scientific advancements are changing the way we think about our security ... If you'll pardon my stealing a film line: 'The force is with us' ..."
|
|
Reagan
continued:
"We have used and will continue to use space to make ours a safer world ... Space technology has already revolutionized communications and is assisting everyone from farmers to navigators ...
Space, like freedom, is a limitless, never-ending frontier on which
our citizens can prove that they are indeed Americans.
Dr. Goddard
once wrote a letter to H.G. Wells in which he explained:
'There can be no thoughts of finishing,
for aiming at the stars, both literally and figuratively, is a problem to occupy generations, so that no matter how much progress one makes,
there is always the thrill of just beginning.''
Well, let us hope that Americans never lose that thrill ...
God bless you all."
|
|
Wernher von Braun
stated:
"Don't you know about your own rocket pioneer?
Dr. Goddard
was ahead of us all"
Braun
added:
"Goddard's
rockets ... may have been rather crude by present-day standards, but they blazed the trail and incorporated many features used in our most modern rockets and space vehicles."
|
|
After
Robert Goddard
successfully launched his first liquid-fueled rocket in 1926, news spread.
Wernher von Braun
read the newspaper reports and began corresponding with him.
The next year, 1927,
Wernher von Braun
started the
German Rocket Society.
1927 was also the same year that
Charles A. Lindbergh
flew from New York to Paris. World relations with
Germany
had not yet become hostile.
In 1929,
Lindbergh
began supporting
Goddard's
work.
In the 1930s,
Lindbergh
was sent by the
U.S. military
to
Germany
to assess their
aviation.
While there, he was presented with the Service Cross of the German Eagle on behalf of
Adolf Hitler.
In 1936, the
Olympics
were held in
Berlin,
where
Hitler
had built a 100,000 seat stadium.
|
|
Not suspecting their ill-intent,
Goddard
naively answered telephone inquiries from
German rocket engineers.
By 1939,
Goddard
ended this when he suspected his research was being co-opted by Germany's
National Socialist Workers Party.
In 1940,
Goddard
began warning officials in the
U.S. Army and Navy
of the growing
Nazi rocket threat,
although his warnings were largely ignored.
The U.S. Army was not interested, but the
U.S. Navy
was.
From 1942, till his death in 1945,
Goddard
was director of research developing experimental engines at the
U.S. Navy's Bureau of Aeronautics
at Annapolis, Maryland.
|
|
When
World War II
started,
Wernher von Braun
was a graduate student
In
Nazi Germany,
as on many campuses today, if a scientist refused to comply with the prevailing
politically correct view,
his or her career in academia was ended.
|
|
Von Braun
was recruited by the
National Socialist Workers Party
to work as a scientist developing the
V-2 rocket.
|
|
The
V2 rocket
was the
world's first long-range guided ballistic missile,
and it wreaked
devastating destruction
on Allied cities, including
London, Antwerp and Liège.
|
|
As the War neared its end, in May of 1945, the
United States
and the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
were racing against each other to
capture the German scientists.
Von Braun
and the other Germany scientists decided to escape to the
American side
rather than the
Soviet Union.
|
|
Suffering a broken arm during his escape,
Wernher von Braun
stated:
"I myself, and everybody you see here, have decided to go West. And I think our decision was not one of expediency, but
a moral decision.
We knew that we had created
a new means of warfare,
and the question as ... to what victorious nation we were willing to entrust this brainchild of ours was
a moral decision
more than anything else ...
|
|
... We wanted ... to see the world spared another conflict such as Germany had just been through,
and we felt that only by surrendering such a weapon to
people who are guided by the Bible
could such an assurance to the world be best secured."
|
|
Wernher von Braun
emigrated to the United States where
he became a U.S. citizen
in 1955, calling it "one of the proudest and most significant days of my life."
|
|
In 1958, he launched
America's first satellite.
He became known as the
"Father of Modern Space Flight."
|
|
Von Braun
worked on the U.S. guided missile program and was director of
NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
|
|
Wernher von Braun
was the chief architect of the
Saturn V booster rocket,
the most powerful rocket ever brought to operational status, being over a football field in length from top to base.
The
Saturn V
was the only launch vehicle powerful enough to lift beyond low Earth orbit a spacecraft capable of carrying humans.
|
|
The
Ares V
rocket was designed to surpass the Saturn V, but President Obama canceled the
Constellation Program
in 2010.
|
|
Wernher von Braun
received the
National Medal of Science
in 1975, and is considered "without doubt, the greatest rocket scientist in history."
|
|
The Founder of the
National Space Institute,
Wernher von Braun
stated:
"In this age of space flight, when we use the modern tools of science to advance into new regions of human activity,
the Bible
- this grandiose, stirring history of the gradual revelation and unfolding of
the moral law
- remains in every way
an up-to-date book.
Our knowledge and use of the laws of nature that enable us to fly to the Moon also enable us to destroy our home planet with the atom bomb.
|
|
...
Science
itself does not address the question whether we should use the
power
at our disposal
for good or for evil.
The guidelines of what we ought to do are furnished in
the moral law of God
...
It is no longer enough that we pray that God may be with us on our side.
We must learn to pray that we may be on God's side."
|
|
Wernher von Braun
wrote in
This Week Magazine,
January 1, 1961:
"But I can't help feeling at the same time that this space effort of ours is bigger even than a rivalry between the
United States
and
Russia
...
|
|
... The heavens beyond us are enormous beyond comprehension, and the further we penetrate them,
the greater will be our human understanding of the great universal purpose, the Divine Will itself."
|
|
Wernher von Braun
wrote to the
California State Board of Education
, September 14, 1972:
"Dear Mr. Grose:
In response to your inquiry about my personal views concerning the
'Case for DESIGN'
as a viable scientific theory or the origin of the universe, life and man, I am pleased to make the following observations.
For me, the idea of a
creation
is not conceivable without evoking the necessity of
design.
One cannot be exposed to
the law and order of the universe
without concluding that there must be
design and purpose behind it all.
|
|
... In the world round us, we can behold the obvious manifestations of
an ordered, structured plan or design.
We can see the will of the species to live and propagate.
And we are humbled by the
powerful forces at work on a galactic scale,
and the purposeful orderliness of nature that endows a tiny and ungainly seed with the ability to develop into a beautiful flower.
The better we understand the intricacies of the universe and all harbors, the more reason we have found to marvel at the
inherent design
upon which it is based ..."
|
|
Von Braun
continued:
"While the admission of
a design for the universe
ultimately raises the question of
a Designer
(a subject outside of science), the scientific method does not allow us to exclude data which lead to the conclusion that
the universe, life and man are based on design.
To be forced to believe only one conclusion - that
everything in the universe happened by chance - would violate the very objectivity of science itself.
Certainly there are those who argue that the universe evolved out of a random process, but
what random process could produce the brain of a man or the system or the human eye?..."
|
|
Von Braun
added:
"Some people say that science has been unable to prove the existence of
a Designer.
They admit that many of the miracles in the world around us are hard to understand, and they do not deny that the universe, as modern science sees it, is indeed a far more wondrous thing than the creation medieval man could perceive.
|
|
... But they still maintain that since science has provided us with so many answers the day will soon arrive when we will be able to understand even the creation of the fundamental laws of nature without a
Divine intent.
They challenge science to prove
the existence of God
. But must we really light a candle to see the sun?
|
|
... Many men who are intelligent and of good faith say they cannot visualize
a Designer.
Well, can a physicist visualize an electron?
The electron is materially inconceivable
and yet it is so perfectly known through its effects that we use it to illuminate our cities, guide our airlines through the night skies and take the most accurate measurements ..."
|
|
He stated further:
"What strange rationale makes some physicists accept
the inconceivable electrons
as real while refusing to accept t
he reality of a Designe
r on the ground that they cannot conceive Him?
I am afraid that, although they really do not understand
the electron
either, they are ready to accept it because they managed to produce a rather clumsy mechanical model of it borrowed from rather limited experience in other fields, but they would not know how to begin building a model of
God.
|
|
... I have discussed the aspect of
a Designer
at some length because it might be that the primary resistance to acknowledging the
'Case for Design'
as a viable scientific alternative to the current 'Case for Chance' lies in the inconceivability, in some scientists' minds, of
a Designer.
The inconceivability of some ultimate issue (which will always lie outside scientific resolution) should not be allowed to rule out any theory that explains the interrelationship of observed data and is useful for prediction ..."
|
|
Von Braun
concluded:
"We in NASA were often asked what the real reason was for the amazing string of successes we had with our Apollo flights to the Moon. I think the only honest answer we could give was that we tried to never overlook anything.
|
|
... It is in that same sense of scientific honesty that I endorse the presentation of alternative
theories for the origin of the universe, life and man
in the science classroom.
It would be an error to overlook the possibility that
the universe was planned
rather than happened by chance.
With kindest regards. Sincerely,
Wernher von Braun."
|
|
Wernher von Braun
wrote an article titled
"My Faith: A space-age scientist tells why he must believe in God"
(American Weekly,
February 10, 1963, Foreword to his
Anthology on the Creation and Design exhibited in Nature):
"The two most powerful forces shaping our civilization today are
science
and
religion.
Through
science
man strives to learn more of the mysteries of
creation.
Through
religion
he seeks to know the
Creator.
Neither operates independently.
It is as difficult for me to understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of
a superior rationality behind the existence of the universe
as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science.
Far from being independent or opposing forces,
science
and
religion
are
sisters.
Both seek a better world. While
science
seeks control over the forces of nature around us, religion controls the forces of nature within us ..."
|
|
Von Braun
continued:
"As we learn more and more about
nature,
we become more deeply impressed and humbled by its
orderliness
and
unerring perfection.
Our expanding knowledge of the laws of the universe have enabled us to send men out of their natural environment into the strange new environment of space, and return them safely to earth.
Since we first began the
exploration of space through rocketry,
we have regularly received letters expressing concern over what the writers call our 'tampering' with God's creation.
Some writers view with dismay the possibility of upsetting the delicate balance of the tremendous forces of nature that permit life on our globe ..."
|
|
Von Braun
added:
"One letter revealed an honest fear that a rocket would strike an angel in space high above the earth.
And one of the Russian cosmonauts stated flatly after his earth-circling flight in space: 'I was looking around attentively all day during my flight, but I didn't find anybody there - neither angels nor God ...' Such shallow thinking is childish and pathetic.
I have no fear that a physical object will harm any spiritual entities. Manned space flight is an amazing achievement. But it has opened for us thus far only a tiny door for viewing the awesome reaches of space.
|
|
Our outlook through this peephole at the vast mysteries or the universe
only confirms our belief in the certainty of its Creator.
Finite man
cannot comprehend an
omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent, and infinite God.
Any effort to visualize
God,
to reduce him to our comprehension, to describe him in our language, beggars his greatness.
I find it best through faith to accept
God
as an Intelligent Will, perfect in goodness, revealing himself in the world of experience more fully down through the ages, as man's capacity for understanding grows.
|
|
For
spiritual comfort
I find assurance in the concept of the
fatherhood of God.
For
ethical guidance
I rely on the corollary concept of the
brotherhood of man
..."
|
|
He stated further:
"Scientists now believe that in nature, matter is never destroyed. Not even the tiniest particle can disappear without a trace.
Nature does not know extinction - only transformation.
Would
God
have less regard for
his masterpiece of creation, the human soul?
Each person receives a gift of life on this earth.
A belief in the
continuity of spiritual existence,
after the comparative mere flick of three score and ten years of physical life here in the endless cycle of eternity, makes the
action of each moment like an investment with far-reaching dividends.
The knowledge that
man can choose between good and evil
should draw him closer to his
Creator
..."
|
|
Von Braun
concluded:
"Next, the realization should dawn that his survival here and hereafter depends on his adherence to the
spiritual rather than the scientific.
Our decisions undeniably influence the course of future events. Nature around us still harbors more unsolved than solved mysteries.
|
|
... But
science
has mastered enough of these forces to usher in
a golden age for all mankind,
if this power is used for good
- or
to destroy us, if evil triumphs.
The
ethical guidelines of religion
are the
bonds that can hold our civilization together.
Without them man can never attain that cherished
goal of lasting peace
with
himself,
his
God,
and his
fellowman."
|
|
Erik Bergaust's book,
Wernher von Braun: The authoritative and definitive biographical profile of the father of modern space flight
(National Space Institute, Washington, DC, 1976), quoted
Wernher von Braun
as stating:
"The
laws of creation
and the
divine intentions underlying the creation.
Through
science
man attempts to understand the
laws of creation;
through
religious
activities he attempts to understand the intentions of the
Creator.
Each approach is a search for ultimate truth ..."
|
|
Von Braun
continued:
"There have been conflicts in the relationship between
science
and
religion
...
Personally, I find this state of affairs unsatisfactory, for I wish to regard the
Creator
and
His creation
as an entity ...
science
and
religion
are like
two windows in a house
through which we look at the reality of the
Creator
and the
laws
manifested in
His creation.
As long as we see two different images through these two windows and cannot reconcile them, we must keep trying to obtain a more complete and better integrated total picture of the ultimate reality by properly tying together our
scientific and religious concepts
..."
|
|
He stated further:
"The more we learn about
God's creation,
the more I am impressed with the orderliness and unerring perfection of the natural laws that govern it.
In this perfection, man - the
scientist
- catches of glimpse of the
Creator
and
His design
for nature.
The
man-to-God relationship
is deepened in the
devout scientist
as his knowledge of the
natural laws
grows."
|
|
Wernher von Braun
died JUNE 16, 1977.
|
|
As Vice-President of Engineering and Development at Fairchild Industries, Germantown, Maryland,
Wernher von Braun
wrote the forward to Harold Hill's book
From Goo to You by Way of the Zoo
(Plainfield, NJ: Logos International, 1976):
"Six Apollo crews have visited the moon and returned safely to earth. The Skylab astronauts have spent 171 days, 13 hours, and 14 minutes working and living in space, and all have returned hale and hearty to earth.
Why are we flying to the moon? What is our purpose? What is the essential justification for the exploration of space? The answer, I am convinced, lies rooted not in whimsy, but in the
nature of man.
|
|
... Whereas all other living beings seem to find their places in the
natural order
and fulfill their role in life with a kind of calm acceptance, man clearly exhibits confusion.
Why the anxiety? Why the storm and stress?
Man really seems to be the only living thing uncertain of his role in the universe;
and in his uncertainty, he has been calling since time immemorial upon the stars and the heavens for salvation and for answers to his eternal questions: Who am I? Why am I here? ..."
|
|
Von Braun
continued:
"Astronomy
is the
oldest science,
existed for thousands of years as the only science, and is today considered the queen of the sciences.
Although man lacks the eye of the night owl, the scent of the fox, or the hearing of the deer, he has an uncanny ability to learn about abstruse things like the motions of the planets, the cradle-to-the-grave cycle of the stars, and the distance between stars.
The mainspring of science is curiosity. There have always been men and women who felt a burning desire to know what was under the rock, beyond the hills, across the oceans.
|
|
... This restless breed now wants to know what makes an atom work, through what process life reproduces itself, or what is the geological history of the moon.
But there would not be a single great accomplishment in the history of mankind without faith.
Any man who strives to accomplish something needs
a degree of faith.
But many people find the
churches,
those old ramparts of faith, badly battered by the onslaught of three hundred years of scientific skepticism ..."
|
|
Von Braun
added:
"This has led many to believe that
science
and
religion
are not compatible, that 'knowing' and 'believing' cannot live side by side.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Science
and
religion
are not antagonists.
On the contrary, they are sisters. While science tries to learn more about the creation, religion tries to better understand the
Creator
...
|
|
... For me the idea of a
creation
is inconceivable without
God.
One cannot be exposed to the
law and order of the universe
without concluding that
there must be a divine intent behind it all.
|
|
... Some
evolutionists
believe that the creation is the result of a
random arrangement of atoms and molecules over billions of years.
But when they consider the development of the human brain by
random processes
within a time span of less than a million years, they have to admit that this span is just not long enough.
Or take the evolution of the eye in the animal world.
What random process
could possibly explain the simultaneous evolution of the eye's optical system, the conductors of the optical signals from the eye to the brain, and the optical nerve center in the brain itself where the incoming light impulses are converted to an image the conscious mind can comprehend?
Our space ventures have been only the smallest of steps in the vast reaches of the universe and have introduced more mysteries than they have solved ..."
|
|
He stated further:
"Speaking for myself, I can only say that the
grandeur of the cosmos
serves to confirm
my belief in the certainty of a Creator.
Of course, the discoveries in astronomy, biology, physics, and even in psychology have shown that we have to enlarge the medieval image of
God.
If there is a mind behind the immense complexities of the multitude of phenomena which man, through the tools of science, can now observe, then it is that of
a Being tremendous in His power and wisdom.
|
|
... But we should not be dismayed by the relative insignificance of our own planet in the vast universe as modern science now sees it.
In fact
God deliberately reduced Himself to the stature of humanity
in order to
visit the earth in person,
because the cumulative effect over the centuries of millions of individuals choosing to please themselves rather than
God
had infected the whole planet.
When
God became a man Himself,
the experience proved to be nothing short of pure agony.
In man's time-honored fashion, they would unleash the whole arsenal of weapons against
Him:
misrepresentation, slander, and accusation of treason..."
|
|
Von Braun
concluded:
"The stage was set for a situation without parallel in the history of the earth.
God would visit creatures and they would nail Him to the cross!
Although I know of no reference to
Christ
ever commenting on scientific work, I do know that He said, 'Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.'
Thus I am certain that, were He among us today,
Christ
would encourage scientific research as modern man's most noble
striving to comprehend and admire His Father's handiwork.
The
universe
as revealed through scientific inquiry is the
living witness that God has indeed been at work.
|
|
... When astronaut
Frank Borman
returned from his unforgettable Christmas, 1968, flight around the moon with Apollo 8, he was told that a Soviet Cosmonaut recently returned from a space flight had commented that he had seen neither God nor angels on his flight.
Had Borman seen God? the reporter inquired.
Frank Borman
replied, 'No,
I did not see Him either, but I saw His evidence.'"
|
|
John F. Kennedy
stated at Rice University, September 12, 1962:
"William Bradford, speaking in 1630 of the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, said that all great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties, and both must be ... overcome with answerable courage.
|
|
... But if I were to say, my fellow citizens, that we shall send to the moon, 240,000 miles away from the control station in Houston,
a giant rocket more than 300 feet tall,
the length of this football field, made of new metal alloys, some of which have not yet been invented,
|
|
capable of standing heat and stresses several times more than have ever been experienced, fitted together with a precision better than the finest watch, carrying all the equipment needed for propulsion, guidance, control, communications, food and survival,
on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body, and then return it safely to earth, re-entering the atmosphere at speeds of over 25,000 miles per hour, causing heat about half that of the temperature of the sun ...
|
|
and do all this, and do it right, and do it first before this decade is out -- then we must be bold.
...
Space is there, and we're going to climb it,
and the moon and the planets are there, and new hopes for knowledge and peace are there.
|
|
... And, therefore,
as we set sail we ask God's blessing
on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which man has ever embarked."
|
|
Schedule Bill Federer for informative interviews & captivating PowerPoint presentations: 314-502-8924
wjfederer@gmail.com
American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission is granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate, with acknowledgment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|