|
Overview of the Alignment Proposal
Developed by Duke-Margolis, NCDHHS, and the HCP-LAN with stakeholder feedback from clinically integrated networks, NC Prepaid Health Plans, commercial payers and purchasers, primary care providers, federally-qualified health centers, health systems, and pharmacy groups, the Alignment Proposal for the NC STC is a proposed set of actions to address shared challenges of health reform implementation with the goals of improving population health, advancing health equity, enhancing patient experience, relieving provider burden, and reducing cost.
The Alignment Proposal documents the progress of NC STC efforts, outlines a set of preliminary action areas to achieve STC goals, and establishes a foundation for continued partnership and alignment long-term. Strategies and action areas include: aligning quality measures, starting with aligned implementation of a few key measures; improving data sharing infrastructure by meeting organizations where they are and helping progress toward national interoperability standards; and enhancing health equity data like race, ethnicity, and language and health-related social needs through standardized approaches to collection, sharing and use of these data.
To align quality measures, the Alignment Proposal for the NC STC recommends establishing a starter measure set to focus efforts and streamline measure implementation. These starter measures include Childhood Immunization Status (CBE #0038), Glycemic Status Assessment for Patients with Diabetes (CBE #0575) (Previously known as Hemoglobin A1c Control for Patients with Diabetes), and Controlling High Blood Pressure (CBE #0018).
Duke-Margolis convened a new NC STC Data Sharing Workgroup comprised of technical data experts to identify pain points and strategies to reduce burden in the collection and reporting on the three starter measures. To enhance health equity data, the Alignment Proposal for the NC STC proposes identifying guiding principles and establishing foundational steps to measure and track disparities with the established NC STC Health Disparities Workgroup.
Reflecting on the Alignment Proposal
The May public meeting featured two panel discussions to solicit feedback from stakeholders on current and future NC STC work and discuss ways to make progress as a state on shared goals for the NC STC. During the first discussion, panelists identified challenges to achieving whole-person care, citing provider burnout, time constraints, variability and misalignment in value-based payment (VBP) models, and complexity in data infrastructure as important barriers to overcome. They spoke about opportunities to address these barriers with the strategies outlined in the Alignment Proposal, underscoring the importance of the proposed action areas to align quality measures and improve data infrastructure.
Panelists spoke about the importance of community engagement when adopting the action areas from the Alignment Proposal. Sam Thompson, Executive Director of the NC HIEA, explained that we must meet communities, organizations, and providers where they are and provide the resources needed to participate in VBP models and other reform efforts that help advance whole-person care. Dr. Angelo Sinopoli, Executive Vice President of Value-Based Care at Cone Health, echoed this, highlighting that the most significant advancements in health and well-being for Medicaid populations have been made in partnership with communities.
The panel also discussed multi-stakeholder reform efforts. Panelists emphasized that coordination is essential to standardize data processes and reduce complexity. Dr. Michelle Bucknor, Regional Chief Medical Officer at Aetna Better Health, emphasized the need to reduce administrative burden in the measurement process. Kristen Dubay, Chief of Population Health at NC Medicaid, shared that complex data systems could be addressed with modernized data tools and systems. Sam Thompson added that the NC HIEA and other organizations have begun to improve the data sharing landscape. The panel highlighted that bringing stakeholders together through NC STC public meetings, workgroups, and learning calls is essential to move forward and find solutions.
Data to Address Health Disparities
The second panel expanded on the previous discussion about streamlined data collection, discussing strategies to reduce disparities and advance health equity through better data on race, ethnicity, language, rurality, disability status, health-related social needs, etc. Panelists described leading practices for the collection, sharing, and use of health equity data to improve health and well-being in North Carolina. Each panelist shared ways that health equity data could shape policy and practice. Examples included adopting a health equity governance framework, pursuing innovative research to push the data further, and using data to adopt evidence-based, data-driven policies.
Panelists spoke about the importance of trust in data collection and how building and maintaining community trust through meaningful engagement and transparency could help mitigate some of the historical barriers to collection, leading to data incompleteness. Dr. Gabriela Plasencia, Clinical Associate at Duke Family Medicine and Community Health and National Clinician Scholar, and Health Equity Policy and Primary Care Fellow at Duke-Margolis, highlighted that community health workers, because they are often representatives of communities that have been historically marginalized, could help instill trust among patients and communities and improve data collection. Cornell Wright, Health Equity Advisor for General Dynamics Information Technology, added that proactive involvement in communities before issues arise can improve transparency and trust. Jennifer Houlihan, Vice President of Enterprise Population Health-Advocate Health, reemphasized that point and explained the importance of community engagement teams working alongside primary care, population health, and other care teams.
Panelists also discussed recent updates by the Office of Management and Budget to the federal standards for maintaining, collecting, and presenting data on race and ethnicity. Dr. Plasencia shared that many of the race and ethnicity categories currently used are very broad and don’t accurately reflect how people identify or underlying risk factors that put people at higher risk for certain diseases. Having better, more accurate data can help create more tailored interventions.
Finally, Dr. Emma Sandoe, former Deputy Director of Medicaid Policy at NC DHHS, shared how NC Medicaid’s robust and complete race and ethnicity data can be utilized to guide health equity efforts. Panelists agreed that the NC STC can help achieve alignment and standardization of health equity data to support efforts across organizations, and in collaboration with communities. Health equity data can help establish more coordinated and targeted interventions to address health disparities and improve overall health and well-being.
|