|
When commercial property loans go into default, how much can lenders reasonably expect to recoup from asset dispositions or the sale of mortgage notes? A new study from Real Capital Analytics (RCA) reveals that recovery rates on defaulted commercial mortgages vary by property type, location and loan-to-value ratios.
The New York-based researcher analyzed 145 defaulted commercial mortgages that have been liquidated this year. Of the $3.2 billion outstanding balance on those mortgages, lenders recovered $1.9 billion, equating to a recovery rate of nearly 60% before costs and fees.
Among RCA’s key findings:
• Development-oriented loans such as land and construction, condo conversion and redevelopment loans have a far lower average recovery rate (48%) than acquisition or refinancing loans (66%).
• Loans on developments not yet complete have the lowest average recovery rate of any loan type, just 32% of the outstanding balance.
• Among major income-producing property types, office buildings have the lowest average recovery rate (53%), but suburban properties have achieved a higher rate than CBD properties.
• Mortgages on retail properties have experienced the highest average recovery rate (72%) so far in 2009, but the sector has seen relatively few resolutions compared with the huge number of properties in default.
• Assets located in Phoenix, Tampa and Detroit have the lowest average recovery rate, while those in New York and Los Angeles metro areas have the highest recovery rate.
• The higher the loan-to-value at the time the loan was originated, the lower the recovery rate. Mortgages that were originally 50% loan-to-value experienced a 75% recovery rate, while those that were 100% or more at origination averaged a recovery rate of 57%.
• Of all loans originated for the acquisition or refinancing of properties, CMBS loans liquidated this year have the lowest average recovery rate (60%) among all lenders.
• Regional and local banks have experienced the lowest overall recovery rate, but that is largely due to a heavier concentration of development and redevelopment-oriented loans.
What’s the takeaway for commercial real estate borrowers and lenders from this study? “They need to think more carefully about the structure of their funding commitments and the impact of that structure on their investments in this notoriously cyclical industry,” emphasizes Ben Thypin, senior market analyst with Real Capital Analytics.
|