About Us

Services

Awards

Website

 

PROXY SEASON 2025 SO FAR

 
 

WHAT WE'VE SEEN AT THIS POINT IN THE 2025 PROXY SEASON

Proxy season for 2025 started fast and continues to accelerate. Companies have seen an increasing number of activist campaigns compared to earlier years, while proxy contests have become bigger and more complicated. By contrast, precatory proposals have fallen dramatically, while so-called anti-ESG proposals have increased. These trends suggest boards can turn attention to responding to activist investors and cultivating significant shareholders.


In this month’s newsletter, we recap proxy season activist so far and highlight some notable activist situations that challenge companies and their boards.

 
 

ACTIVISM INCREASES SINCE EVEN 2024

 

As busy as 2024 was for boards and activists, 2025 has started off even busier. By one measure, US companies saw a 43% increase in activist projects over 2024, with 40 companies responding to activist campaigns by March 31 (Barclays). US companies are on track to match or even beat the previous high of 144 campaigns that was reported for 2022.


For specific proxy contests, we also see more in 2025 than before. In the US, there were 19 pending contests as of mid-March, a substantial increase over 2024. These are also more ambitious than ever, with over half looking to elect all available board seats, and only one seeking only a single board seat (The Activist Investor).


While we’re only mid-way through it, we’ve already seen activists win somewhat more contests compared to 2024. Seven completed contests that went to a shareholder vote, rather than the company and the activist investor settling or having the activist withdraw its nominations. In three of those, the activist investor won all or almost all of the board seats it sought, while in another three, the company won all of the seats up for election. In one, the activist investor won only one board seat. In all of 2024, companies won all the available board seats in eleven out of fifteen proxy contests that went to a vote, while activists won all available board seats in just two proxy contests (The Activist Investor).

 
 
 

NOTABLE AND INTERESTING ACTIVIST SITUATIONS

Among the few dozen current activist situations, most are typical proxy contests. A few, though, go beyond a board election.


Phillips 66 (PSX) – Elliott Management: feared activist Elliott began a proxy contest at PSX, looking for all four available seats on a classified board. Notably, Elliott also sued PSX over the classified board, looking to Delaware Chancery Court to reverse changes to the board size and classes that would reduce the available seats.


Barnwood (BRN) – Ned Sherwood: activist investor Sherwood originally nominated directors for all five available board seats. BRN rejected the notice of nomination, so Sherwood concurrently initiated a consent solicitation to replace those five directors.


Quanterix (QTRX) – Kent Lake: investor Kent Lake fund seeks all three board seats available on the QTRX board, in large part to oppose a deal in which QTRX proposes to buy Akoya Biosciences. In addition to soliciting proxies for the director election at the upcoming AGM, Kent Lake has also begun to solicit proxies in opposition to the deal at the upcoming special shareholder meeting.


180 Degree Capital (TURN) – Marlton Partners: investor Marlton nominated three candidates for five available board seats at TURN, a publicly-traded activist investment fund. In addition to seeking a higher valuation for TURN, Marlton opposes a proposed acquisition of TURN. InvestorCom serves as proxy solicitor for Marlton.


Zevra Pharmaceutical (ZVRA) – Daniel Mangless: shareholder Mangless is repeating a proxy contest from two years ago, one of the first under the then-new universal proxy card rule. Then, he won both board seats that he sought. This year, he nominated two more candidates, including his proxy solicitor.


Harley-Davidson (HOG) – H Partners: H Partners, a long-time HOG investor, settled a proxy contest in 2022 that landed one of their executives on the HOG board. That executive just resigned, citing declining results and corporate governance problems. The date for nominating directors for the 2025 AGM passed, so H Partners instead began a withhold campaign to remove three HOG directors.

 
 
 

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL DECLINE

While fund activism has picked up in 2025, ESG activism has diminished significantly. The number of ESG proposals submitted to US companies in 2025 decreased 34% relative to 2024, while the number of no-action requests submitted to the SEC almost tripled relative to 2024 (Proxy Preview). As a notable example, Exxon-Mobil (XOM) will have no shareholder proposals on the AGM agenda for the first time in at least 25 years.


Overall, it appears shareholder will have many fewer ESG proposals to consider at 2025 AGMs. The decrease is predominantly in environmental and social proposals, the “E” and “S” in ESG, which are down by over half. Governance proposals, such as for majority voting standards or declassified boards, have decreased by a much smaller magnitude.


Both changes at the SEC and the overall environment for shareholder proposals help explain the shift. The SEC has made it much easier for companies to exclude precatory proposals, with its new interpretation of the “ordinary business” basis for exclusion. Shareholders saw a record number of ESG proposals in the past two or three years, as support for these proposals declined dramatically relative to earlier years. At the same time, the XOM lawsuit against two ESG proponents in 2024 also prompted proponents to reconsider the number, types, and targets of their ESG proposals. Thus, ESG proponents have thus pulled back significantly on submitting them.

 
 
X  LinkedIn  Web
 

Let’s Stay Connected!


Join the conversation and keep up with us on socials! Be the first to know about exclusive industry updates and insight, exciting announcements and company news you don’t want to miss. Why stop here? Follow us on social media and tag us—we’d love to connect. Engage with us today!


📲

See You Online!

 
 
 
 

InvestorCom President & CEO John Glenn Grau joins IPO Edge Editor-in-Chief John Jannarone to discuss the shifting dynamics of proxy season and shareholder activism.

At InvestorCom, we equip issuers with data-driven strategies and expert guidance through services like proxy solicitation and stock surveillance.


Even companies that don’t consider themselves activist targets must stay informed—understanding their shareholder base, voting behaviors, affiliations, and even identifying non-13F filers is crucial. Being proactive is key. Know who your shareholders are with InvestorCom!

🎥 Watch The Full Interview Here
 

SEC Guidance on Beneficial Ownership Reporting. Key updates you need to know:

The SEC updated its Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) for Exchange Act Sections 13(d) and 13(g), impacting Schedules 13D and 13G filings. These adjustments clarify how investors report beneficial ownership, replacing previous guidance from 1997. 

Understand Why Some Shareholders May Not be Required to Make These Filings
 

ICOM President and CEO at the 4th annual Palm Beach CorpGov Forum

With moderator Ronald Orol Senior Editor of The Deal

Watch Full Panel: 2025 Proxy Season Outlook
 
 

Thinking About Activism: InvestorCom President John Glenn Grau at Nasdaq - CorpGov

CorpGov hosted a fireside chat on Oct. 23 at Nasdaq MarketSite with John Glenn Grau, president at InvestorCom. The in-person interview was joined by Editor-in-Chief John Jannarone and they discussed the shift in small-cap activism and why these companies have been targeted more than ever before, the growing political uncertainty in a significant election year, among other [...]

More on Yahoo Finance
 
 

Contact Us


203-972-9300



Info@Investor-Com.com

 
 
X Share This Email
LinkedIn Share This Email

We can't wait to serve you soon!

 

InvestorCom | 19 Old Kings Highway South | Darien, CT 06820 US