Contract/Property Dispute, PLC 21E-1053819
Client is in her 50s. Client owned her home in joint tenancy. While client was recovering from surgery, the joint tenant transferred their own interest in the property to the adverse party. Over the time that client and adverse party owned the home, the adverse party did not contribute to the maintenance of the home and upon sale of the home, the adverse party did not pay client her appropriate interest. Client would like assistance recovering these funds.
Email Staff Attorney Morgan Padgett
Habitability, PLC 22-0071703
Clients are monolingual Spanish speakers with 3 minor children. They have lived in the unit for almost 20 years. Recently they have been served with a 60-day notice to vacate expiring the end of December stating the landlord’s daughter is planning to reside in the unit. There are multiple habitability issues with the apartment including no working heater, plumbing issues, bug infestation resulting in bites to the inhabitants, mold, holes in the wall, and holes in the carpet. The Clients have complained to the landlord numerous times over the phone, in person, and over text message. Clients are seeking possible compensation for a portion of past rent paid for the landlord’s failure to provide habitable premises.
Email Supervising Attorney Richard Walker
Habitability Impact Case, PLC 22-006
A group of tenants has reached out to PLC because of serious habitability concerns in their building. The local housing authority is familiar with the issues and the building has not been able to pass a habitability inspection. The clients would like to pursue litigation to ensure the landlord is providing them safe, habitable units.
Email Supervising Attorney Richard Walker
Landlord/Tenant, PLC 22-0071352
Clients are monolingual Spanish speakers with 4 kids. Their apartment, as well as 3 other apartments, were burned down. Cause of the fire is unknown. Approximately 2 months prior to the fire, the property was sold to new owners who then gave eviction notices to our clients and the 3 other tenants. According to clients, the new property owners stated the reason for the evictions was for renovations of the apartments. After the fire occurred, our clients have been living in a hotel as they did not have any kind of renters insurance or receive any type of assistance from the new property owners. Clients were informed by the new property owners the most they can do is return rent for the days they did not live at the property due to the fire but have not received any money yet. Clients would like assistance in determining if there is anything that the property owners can be held accountable for.
Email Supervising Attorney Richard Walker
Mobilehome – Solar Panel Installation, PLC 22-0069223
Client in his 70s was forced by the mobilehome park owner (the Park) to remove his solar panels from his roof. Prior to installation, client was verbally told by the salesperson that they had approval from the Park to install the solar panels. Client signed a lease for the solar panels, which have since been removed since the Park served him a 14-Day Notice to have his mobilehome in “compliance”. Client has approval from HCD for the installation of the solar panels, which will expire if he does not obtain approval from the Park to reinstall the panels. Client would like to know his rights to installing the solar panels and assistance in getting the mobilehome park to approve the installation.
Email Supervising Attorney Richard Walker
Mobilehome Resident Advocacy, PLC 22-0066121
Clients are a group of mobilehome residents who are seeking assistance negotiating with their mobilehome park regarding rent increases. They have been in communication with their city government and they believe it is in their best interest to have representation for an upcoming, but to-be-scheduled mediation. If the rent increases go forward, many of the residents of the senior mobilehome park will be displaced.
Email Supervising Attorney Richard Walker
Predatory Lending/PACE Home Improvements, PLC 21E-1053491
Client is a monolingual Spanish speaker in her late 40s. Client obtained Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing for work that was never completed on her home. All discussions related to the home "improvements" were in Spanish, and all documents related to the home "improvements" she signed were in English. As a result of the PACE assessment, Client's property taxes have increased by over $10,000 a year, an amount she is unable to pay. Client fears losing her home. Client would like assistance rescinding the contract and removing the tax assessment from her property.
Email Supervising Attorney Suzanne Iazetta
Predatory Lending/PACE Home Improvements, PLC 20-1051904
Client is a monolingual Spanish speaker in her early 50s. Client obtained Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing for work that was never completed on her home. All discussions related to the home "improvements" were in Spanish, and all documents related to the home "improvements" she signed were in English. As a result of the PACE assessment, Client's property taxes have increased by over $4,000 a year, an amount she is unable to pay. Client fears losing her home. Client would like assistance rescinding the contract and removing the tax assessment from her property.
Email Supervising Attorney Suzanne Iazetta
Predatory Lending/PACE Home Improvements, PLC 19E-1047995
Client is in her 60s and speaks Spanish. Client was solicited for so-called energy efficient home improvements by a door-to-door salesperson. Client considered the improvements, but never actually signed a contract. Without client’s understanding, the contractor financed home improvements through a tax assessment on client’s property. The contractor never started work on the project, and client was shocked to learn what happened when she received her next property tax statement. Client is seeking assistance recovering the money she paid to remove the tax assessment so she can pay back the countless friends and family who helped her raise that money.
Email Supervising Attorney Suzanne Iazetta
Writ and Stay of Eviction, PLC 21-0062275
Client is a veteran, is living with multiple disabilities, and is a recipient of a housing voucher who is at risk of being displaced. The housing authority is threatening to terminate his voucher based on misunderstandings and miscommunications. Client believes that the housing authority’s determination is incorrect and would like assistance challenging that decision. PLC would like to co-counsel the case.
Email Supervising Attorney Ryan Ueda
|