|
Happy Summer!
I hope you all are getting outside and despite the abundance of summer activities in the midwest, also finding ways to slow down and schedule less (I know in the chaos of modern life that may feel like a pipedream, but I feel it is worth creating some intention around).
I’m popping into your inbox to share a research update on treatment for pediatric anxiety. This study is exciting for several reasons:
First, the sample is more representative of what clinicians, particularly pediatricians see (in comparison to ivory tower clinical trials). By that I mean the sample endorsed higher levels of anxiety and economic hardship as well as co-occurring depression than previous research samples. This means the sample is closer to what occurs in “real-world” settings, meaning the findings may be more generalizable.
Interestingly, the authors hypothesized that fluoxetine would outperform other treatments. This surprised me at first, but is due partly to the large presence of comorbid depression in this sample (67%) and we wouldn’t necessarily expect exposure-based CBT for anxiety to target depression. The other reason the authors leaned this way with their hypotheses was based on the assumption that community therapists delivering CBT may not be as adept at this form of treatment (again compared to CBT clinicians in academic medical centers where clinical trials tend to occur).
Notably, the CBT focused on psychoeducation and coping for the first 6 sessions and then moved to exposures. Similarly, the fluoxetine dosing moved at a relatively quick rate with the recommendation that the dosage be increased if the child was not yet in remission and absent significant side effects. This study had a level 2 optimization phase where CBT focused on more challenging exposures and medication dosage increased.
A decision point for families and clinicians is whether to begin with medication or CBT first. This study was designed to test the effectiveness of various sequences of treatment. This study also addresses the question of how to optimize treatment if improvement is not seen after 12 weeks.
Youth with OCD or PTSD were excluded. Instead the sample had social anxiety, generalized anxiety, panic, or separation anxiety. In addition to depression, ADHD was present in 46% of the sample. The age range of the sample was relatively young with a mean age of 13 (age range 8-17). 83% of sessions were conducted via telehealth (both CBT and med management).
|