Legal Warning For Private Investigators

Private Investigators Face Federal Lawsuits And Loss Of License For Claiming To Be Social Media Investigation Experts Without Proof Of Expert
Social Media Liability Training...
Hello, this is Social Media Attorney Mark Fiedelholtz . If you don't know me, I'm a 30 year digital media law expert that educates investigators on avoiding social media liability when communicating data to third parties. Please read every word of this flyer, it will end up saving your career.If you have any questions, you can call me at 954-748-7698 .
Under New Federal And State Deceptive Advertising Laws, You Must Show Proof To Consumers That You Received Expert Social Media Liability Training On New Speech, Privacy Laws.
When you promote your skills as social media investigator on your website or in other advertising, you imply to a reasonable consumer that you are familiar with new social media speech and privacy laws that govern scrapping and sharing social media data with third parties. Consumers pay more for licensed professionals to do a quality job and protect them from legal exposure. Failing to disclose that you never received expert social media liability training in your advertising violates federal and state deceptive advertising laws and state licensing laws.
Legal Authority: Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act) (15 USC §45,
State licensing laws that address misrepresentation,deceit,incompetence, and
see more case law at the bottom of this flyer.
"I recently completed the online course from Social Media Attorney Mark Fiedelholtz and felt that it was a great value for the price. The course was relevant to what I do on a daily basis.The new knowledge will help me become a better investigator. I would highly recommend this course
to all investigators involved in social media investigations."

Jeremiah Jones, CEO, Bosco, Legal Services Inc. Licensed Investigator

Legal Authority: Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act) (15 USC §45, State licensing laws that address misrepresentation,deceit,incompetence, and see more case law at the bottom of this flyer.
The U.S. Supreme Court Classifies Social Media As A "High Liability" Platform That Can Permanently Destroy
A Person's Reputation Worldwide...
The investigator needs to be educated on the new laws before he or she hits the send key. Once you make a social media mistake and it's seen by a large audience, there is very little an attorney can do to repair the damage.
Legal Authority:  Social Media and Smartphones Are High Risk Platform s (Cases also impact Private sector): : Packingham v. North Carolina 137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017), Riley v. California 134 S. Ct. 2473 (2014), Elonis v. U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2001
Plaintiff Attorneys Use This Test To Validate
Your Social Media Law Competency. If You
Don't Pass, You Have Two Simple Options...
Option I: Immediately register for my social media liability online course..(Affordable group rates are available)

Option II: Immediately stop conducting social media investigations.

Questions ? Call 954-748-7698
Cost-Effective Solution
Social Media Liability Course Taught By A 30 Year Expert
Your $79 Investment In My Online Course
Will End Up Saving Your Investigation Career...
"Let me begin by thanking you once again for an outstanding social media investigation seminar. I have heard positive comments from the attendees. Many students of your class shook my hand and thanked me for bringing such a quality course that pleased everyone."

Sgt. Farzad Shaif, Fmr. Training Supervisor, Pennsylvania State Police, Hershey, PA

Questions? Call 954-748-7698
or mark@newsocialmedialaw.com
Your Instructor Doesn't Have My Expert Credentials,
Courts Will Reject Your Training As Inadequate...
Here's How It Works
6 ONE HOUR MODULES
  • One year to finish the course
  • Modules are easy to follow
  • Course is for non-lawyers
  • Take quizzes again and again
  • Legal updates all year
ANYTIME, ANYWHERE
  • No travel, no overtime
  • Learn at your own pace
  • 24/7 access to any device
  • Email me questions on content
  • Great technical support
Investigators Use My Online Course In Lawsuits To Prove They Received Expert Social Media Liability Training...
"Just a quick note to tell you this is an awesome course!  You have a great platform and video resources for your students and I enjoy learning and progressing at my own pace."

- John Temblador, Remnant Investigation, CPI, CPIA, Social Media Chairman, Private Investigators Association Of Idaho
Special Limited Time COVID-19 Discount Price: $79 (Save $50)

Call for group rates: 954-748-7698
LEGAL AUTHORITY THAT SUPPORTS THE NEED FOR MY
EXPERT ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA LIABILITY ONLINE TRAINING

Legal Authority
Social Media and Smartphones Are High Risk Platform   (Cases also impact private sector):   : Packingham v. North Carolina 137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017), Riley v. California 134 S. Ct. 2473 (2014), Elonis v. U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2001 (2015),  Privacy Issues:   Check your state's statute on password privacy, First and Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Applicable Federal Privacy And Speech Statutes: Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act) (15 USC §45 ), American Disability Act 1990 Applied To Social Media, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Right to Financial Privacy Act (1978), Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999), Video Privacy Protection Act  of 1988 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2710 (2002)) Computer Fraud And Abuse Act Of 1986, Children's Online Privacy Protection Act Of 1998, The Electronic Communications Privacy Act    (1986), Fair Credit Reporting Act (1970),  The Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law 93-5 U.S. Privacy Act Of 1974, Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. 6501–6505, Driver Privacy Protection Act, 18 United States Code, Section 2721 , Writing A Social Media Policy : Costco Wholesale Corporation and United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 371 [Case 34–CA–012421] Text Messages: City of Ontario, California v. Quon 130 S. Ct. 2619 (2010), EEOC Social Media Policy Standards : National Labor Relations Act,   Unprotected Opinions  : Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Company, 497 U.S. 1 (1990),  Training Standards For Public Sectorthat Are Instructive For Private Sector: , City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris 489 U.S. 378 (1989), Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978),  Cases Highlighting The Importance Of Specialized Training To Capture An Affirmative Defense That Can Be Applied In A Social Media Context:   Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998), Burlington Industries Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742(1998). State of Mind For Punitive Damages Kolstad v. American Dental Ass'n,119 S.Ct. 218 (1999).,
Questions? Call 954-748-7698