|
|
|
Lead in Drinking Water Examined at June 6th Capitol Hill Briefing
The urgent issue of lead in drinking water was examined at a Capitol Hill briefing on June 6th co-hosted by the Northeast-Midwest Institute (NEMWI) and the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) International, in collaboration with the Congressional Caucus on Corrosion Prevention. The briefing addressed the current state of lead contamination in America's drinking water and a variety of potential policy responses. In attendance were Congressional staff, policy experts, and individuals from non-governmental organizations. The event featured a panel with experts from NEMWI, NACE International, and Environment America. Following presentations by the four expert panelists, the panel discussed the most pressing problems surrounding this issue and fielded questions from Congressional staff and other attendees.
Executive Director of NACE International Institute Helena Seelinger, as the moderator, opened the briefing by emphasizing the importance of water safety and corrosion controls in the wake of the Flint water crisis and the subsequent discovery of lead in drinking water across the country. She then introduced John Rumpler, Senior Director of the Clean Water for America Campaign for Environment America, who presented his recent report about lead in drinking water,
Get the Lead Out. Rumpler emphasized that lead in drinking water is primarily a children's health concern, as children suffer the worst impacts from consuming lead. He further explained that most taps constructed before 2014 are at risk for containing lead above the desired levels. Finally, he touched on the wide-spread nature of the crisis. This is an issue facing the entire nation; 24 million children are at risk for adverse lead effects, 90% of schools tested have higher than preferred lead levels, and service lines are not the only path through which lead can enter drinking water. In spite of these serious dangers, Rumpler highlighted that, of 31 states studied, 22 are failing to respond adequately with anti-lead policies.
Terry Greenfield, President of NACE International, continued the briefing with a discussion of corrosion controls. He emphasized that current corrosion control practices could have prevented the Flint crisis if they had been implemented correctly. He added that, because we have the ability to control the process of corrosion, this is as much a management issue as it is a technological one. He argued that managers and administrators of these local water systems should assume that water quality levels are as bad as their worst-performing tests indicate to avoid the chance of a Flint-like crisis. In other words, he said, administrators should be proactive in stopping corrosion before it occurs.
Dr. Sri Vedachalam, Director of the Safe Drinking Water Research and Policy Program at NEMWI, presented highlights from a recent report released by NEMWI,
Lead in Drinking Water: Post-Flint Media Coverage and Policy Changes in the Northeast-Midwest Region. He started by noting that this issue is particularly salient to the NEMW because Midwestern and Northeastern states tend to have older infrastructure which is more susceptible to corrosion and high lead levels. He summarized research on media coverage of lead in drinking water across the 18 states studied by NEMWI. This analysis found that lead in water was an issue across these states and even across over 60% of the Congressional districts in the region. He also detailed the policy steps taken in these states to address this problem. He noted that there are many gaps in state policies, with most states implementing effective measures in some areas but falling short in others. He concluded that a federal policy could be more comprehensive and could establish the necessary minimum level of water quality.
Sylvia Hall, the Principal Corrosion Engineer for Sylvia Hall Engineering, explained how these issues had been discussed over 25 years ago and how the Flint crisis renewed public awareness of the problem. She offered further information about how the threat of corrosion led to changes in the way the American public consumed water, such as the increasing use of bottled water and filters.
The presentation slides used at the briefing can be found
here and
here.
For more information,
please contact
Eric Heath
, Senior Policy Counsel for the Mississippi River Basin Program at the Northeast-Midwest Institute
.
|
|
President Trump Retreats from Mexico Tariff Threat after Receiving No New Concessions on Immigration or Imports
President Trump's threat to impose tariffs on all Mexican goods, covered in last week's Weekly Update, was suspended last Friday with the announcement of a joint U.S.-Mexico deal. Though the President hailed the agreement
on Twitter
as a significant step towards eliminating illegal immigration into the U.S. through Mexico,
details of the agreement
are limited. Furthermore, the President emphasized that, should the Mexican legislature fail to affirm the deal,
tariffs would be reinstated
.
Despite initial optimism, administration officials have spent most of their time
defending the deal from criticism since its announcement. Critics have pointed out that the deal does not include any new immigration enforcement procedures. Indeed, the two major components of the deal were already agreed to months before Trump's tariff threat. First, Mexico agreed to deploy 6,000 members of its National Guard to the border, which had been
agreed to in March. In fact, 1,000 guardsmen are already on the border. Additionally, the deal will expand the Migration Protection Protocols, which would hold U.S. asylum-seekers waiting for processing in Mexico across the entire border. But, this deal was agreed to in December and has been slowly implemented. The principal consequence of the deal, if anything, would be to speed up the implementation of these two procedures.
Several potential policies did not appear in a joint statement by the countries. The administration had been hoping to get Mexican agreement on becoming a "safe third country". This would require that any asylum-seekers apply for asylum in Mexico, instead of the U.S., if they pass through Mexico first. Secondly, though Trump
tweeted that Mexico had agreed to greater agricultural purchases from American farmers, the Mexican ambassador to the U.S.
would not commit to increased agricultural trade. It is unclear how the Mexican government would ensure greater agricultural purchases from the U.S., as it is already the second largest importer of American agriculture and these imports are purchased by private businesses by their own volition, not the Mexican government or at its direction.
For more information, please contact Eric Heath, Senior Policy Counsel for the Mississippi River Basin Program at the Northeast-Midwest Institute.
|
|
House Energy and Commerce Committee to Hold Hearing on the Future of the EPA
On Tuesday, June 11, 2019, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce's subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold a hearing on the future of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Previous agency chiefs are scheduled to testify in front of the committee during the hearing.
The group includes Gina McCarthy, who led the EPA during President Obama's second term; Christine Todd Whiteman, who was the EPA administrator during President George W. Bush's first term; William Reilly, who was the head of the agency during George H.W. Bush's term; and Lee Thomas, who was the last EPA chief during President Reagan's final term in office.
Each of the representatives have been critical of the direction of the EPA within the past three years. Their participation in tomorrow's hearing is connected to the letter signed by each ex-chief previously stated as well as William Ruckelshaus, Lisa Jackson, and Carol Browner. The letter urges members to affirm the bipartisan mission statement of the agency, focus on public health and environmental risks, support the role of scientific and economic facts in the EPA's decision and regulation processes, concentrate on policy issues, and look ahead at the future legitimacy of the agency.
The actions that drive doubt in the effectiveness of the current iteration of the EPA includes redefining the 2015 ruling for the Waters of the U.S. through an executive order, reopening the justification for the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, and replacing the Obama-era Clean Power Plan with the Affordable Clean Energy Rule.
The hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 11, 2019, at 10 a.m. in the John D. Dingell Room, 2123 of the Rayburn House Office Building.
For more information, please contact Eric Heath, Senior Policy Counsel for the Mississippi River Basin Program at the Northeast-Midwest Institute.
|
|
Upcoming Webinar, "Advocating for More Equitable Lead Poisoning Prevention Policy"
There will be a webinar on Monday, June 17, at 3:00 pm to explore equity in lead poisoning prevention policy. Structured as a conversation among community and national experts, speakers will discuss how elected and government officials can develop and implement policies that center equity and support the needs of communities most impacted by lead poisoning. Learn more about the 2018 Consensus Conference where proposed strategies were developed.
Date and Time: Monday, June 17, 12:00 to 1:00 pm Pacific Time, 3:00 to 4:00 pm Eastern Time
Register
here
to reserve your spot!
· Lili Farhang - Human Impact Partners (facilitator)
· Rebecca Morley - Consultant for Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
· Juliana Pino - Policy Director, Little Village Environmental Justice Organization
· Kristi Pullen Fedinick - Director of Science and Data, Natural Resources Defense Council
Audience:
National, state, and community-based nonprofit organizations developing and advocating for lead poisoning prevention policy, with a focus on those wanting to explicitly incorporate equity into their efforts.
For more information, please contact
Matthew McKenna, Director of the Great Lakes Washington Program at the Northeast-Midwest Institute
.
|
|
NEMWI: Strengthening the Region that Sustains the Nation
|
|
|
|
|