could form mountains or crystalline deposits. And in fact, the museum has an outstanding mineralogy gallery. But what I most remember is climbing a staircase where the angles of walls, ceiling, stairs, hand railings, windows and light intersected in constantly changing ways. I felt as though I were walking through sculpture. I took a picture of the staircase. When I met Libeskind in his studio a few months later on July 19, 2010, I showed him the photograph. He said he liked it.

And I liked him. I was there to interview him for an article. I forget where it was published.

I was thinking about him today for two reasons. On March 3, 2021, the Museum of Jewish Heritage in Battery Park City, sponsored a conversation between Libeskind and architecture critic Paul Goldberger. It was recorded on video and can be screened on You Tube. Libeskind said — and I'm paraphrasing — that architecture has to do with memory and storytelling. "If a building is good, it tells you something," Libeskind said. "Even the stupidest, most banal glass building that has really zero character tells you a story. It's a very short story which says 'I have nothing to tell you.'"

Libeskind mused on this some more. "We live in many cities — cities of amnesia — where we don't have anything to remember, where there's nothing to orient us to something bigger than our own egos, where we walk through sort of a meaningless consolidation of structures that has very little impact on our soul....It's about a soul. It's not about transactions. It's not about ideology. It's about the sense of communion with people of all sorts and being able to live together in a meaningful way."

Goldberger replied, "Much of what you're saying could be an argument for historic preservation. It could be an argument for keeping older buildings in a city and showing what Lewis Mumford very memorably referred to as 'the visibility of time' when he said that in a city, time becomes visible."

Libeskind agreed.

This got to me because I've been thinking a lot about the South Street Seaport Historic District and why I, and many other people, find it important to preserve it — not piecemeal but intact. Time is, indeed, visible there, in the handmade bricks, the faded fishmonger signage, the hotels that catered to sailors and salesmen, the remnants of the sorting machinery used in the coffee warehouses, the sites of some infamous bars and brothels, the walls covered with 19th century graffiti, the ceiling beams charred by 19th century fires, and on and on. It's all there still but could so easily be damaged or destroyed.

Heated debate has been raging for years as to what should be built on the one acre lot at 250 Water St. In line with Libeskind's thinking, I ask of the current proposals, "What story do they tell? What story will they tell in time to come about the South Street Seaport Historic District? What story will they tell about us and about what we value?"

Downtown Post NYC's website (www.DowntownPostNYC.com) is updated daily. That's the place to check for urgent messages, breaking news and reminders of interesting events in and around Lower Manhattan. So be sure to look at the website every day, especially if you want to know about breaking news.

Downtown Post NYC on Facebook: On its Facebook page, Downtown Post NYC has been providing information about the time of Governor Andrew Cuomo's daily press briefings and how to access them. DPNYC has also been highlighting some of Gov. Cuomo's announcements concerning COVID-19 statistics, reopening of various parts of the state for business and executive orders. Go to Downtown Post NYC's Facebook page by clicking here.

HOW TO SUPPORT DOWNTOWN POST NYC: I made Downtown Post NYC free to subscribers so that no one who was interested in reading it would be excluded because of cost. Downtown Post NYC is largely supported by advertising revenue. In addition, some people have made contributions, which are much appreciated. For more information about how to contribute or advertise, email [email protected].

A city block in the South Street Seaport known as 250 Water St. is bounded not only by Water Street but by Beekman and Pearl Streets and by Peck Slip. Structures on this one acre lot could have their choice of addresses. But 250 Water St. has been the moniker of record at least since 1979 when Milstein Properties bought the lot for $5.8 million. For nearly 40 years, Milstein tried to develop the property but was met with litigation and ultimately with downzoning. Finally, in June 2018, Milstein sold 250 Water St. to The Howard Hughes Corporation (HHC) for $180 million.

Although almost 43 years have passed since Milstein purchased 250 Water St., nothing has yet been built on the lot and it's quite likely that nothing will be built on it in the immediate future. The Howard Hughes Corporation's first and second proposals to the Landmarks Preservation Commission for a tower and other structures at 250 Water St. were met with "No action." That leaves the door open for Howard Hughes to return to the LPC with a third proposal.

Forty-three years is a long time to be expending energy and money fighting over a one acre lot. However none of the participants in this struggle seem ready to throw in the towel.

When HHC bought 250 Water St., it said that it had not decided on what to do with the site. That seems highly unlikely considering the price tag. However HHC proceeded to spend more money not only on that site but on its other Seaport holdings by hiring Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) "to advance a forward-looking plan for the continuing evolution of Seaport District properties," as an HHC press release announced on June 6, 2019. "SOM brings highly relevant expertise to this important commission and will work with HHC and local stakeholders to create a compelling vision that respects the area's character, its local community, and the dynamic role the Seaport has played throughout New York City's history."

After cogitating on this for a year-and-a-half, HHC and SOM came up with a proposal for two towers on the 250 Water St. lot, each of them 37 stories tall (a height of 470 feet). One possible obstacle was that since 2003, the lot has been zoned for a maximum height of 120 feet. HHC said that it would achieve the additional height by transferring air rights from the New Market building site and the Tin Building site, both of them on South Street. HHC doesn't actually own those air rights. They belong to the city, however HHC seemed confident that this problem could be worked out.

HHC said that its request for additional height was necessitated by its plan to include 100 affordable apartments in the towers in addition to 260 market-rate apartments, and by its promise to endow the financially struggling South Street Seaport Museum with $50 million, dependent on HHC's ability to purchase the requested air rights.

At a hearing on Jan. 5, 2021, the Landmarks Preservation Commission torpedoed the Howard Hughes proposal for 250 Water St. LPC said that the towers would overwhelm the mostly four- and five-story buildings in the Seaport. At the same time, the Commissioners largely praised a related proposal for an extension to the South Street Seaport Museum to be built on John Street. HHC was proposing that it provide a design for this extension although the money to actually build it was not on the table.

So it was back to the drawing boards for Howard Hughes and Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. On April 6, 2021, HHC and SOM returned to the Landmarks Preservation Commission with a proposal for a smaller tower and some tweaks as to where it would be positioned. Saul Scherl, President for the Tri-State region for The Howard Hughes Corporation, opened the proceedings by saying that "Our proposal continues to deliver many of the public benefits that we believe will help ensure that the South Street Seaport Historic District remains and retains its essential character and cultural significance."

The tower would only be 27 stories tall, he said, and would be moved to the Pearl Street side of the lot where it would "not be readily apparent from the many viewpoints within the historic district."

The only problem with that is that the zoning still remains what it was — for a building with a maximum height of 120 feet.

Along with the proposed height of the tower, the benefits to the community would be downsized, Scherl said. There would be 70 affordable apartments, not 100, as previously and the proposed endowment of $50 million for the South Street Seaport Museum was no longer being mentioned. What was now being promised was "a substantial funding package to provide financial stability to the South Street Seaport Museum."

Speaking for the South Street Seaport Museum, Capt. Jonathan Boulware, its President and CEO, continued to be grateful. In an article in Crain's New York Business published on April 5, 2021, he said "The Museum urgently needs to secure recurring revenue to keep its doors open and continue carrying out its mission and duty as a steward and interpreter of the historic district. It needs an infusion of funds to stabilize itself in addition to the federal money available from FEMA, with which it can reopen its galleries and once again present its precious 28,000 artifacts to the public. The museum was founded to codify the historic elements of the South Street Seaport and preserve New York's earliest history. Now the Museum, which makes the district what it is, faces demise. The Landmarks Preservation Commission has the power to save it, by viewing this district holistically. If the Seaport Museum dies, the South Street Seaport Historic District as we know it will die with it."

The only problem with that is that the Landmarks Preservation Commission is not empowered to consider community benefits when deciding whether to issue a certificate of appropriateness. It is only supposed to consider architectural integrity.

On April 6, the LPC heard from 77 speakers who supported the Howard Hughes proposal and 53 who opposed it. The Commission received 500 letters opposed to the 250 Water St. plan outlined by HHC and 10 letters in support of it.

A petition from the Seaport Coalition was signed by 8,500 people opposed to the HHC plan. The Seaport Coalition is an all-volunteer group of New Yorkers who want to revitalize the South Street Seaport Historic District in a way that preserves its inherent character as the public steward of New York City's maritime history.

"After nine hours of testimony, we thank the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commissioners who sent The Howard Hughes Corporation's proposal for a 250 Water Street tower back to staff for further revisions," the Seaport Coalition said in a press release. "'It is still inappropriate,' remarked LPC Commissioner Michael Goldblum."

If The Howard Hughes Corporation comes back to the LPC with a revised proposal, the Commission has two options: If the LPC considers the changes to be significant, it can schedule a new hearing where the public again has a chance to comment. If the changes are not considered to be significant, the Commissioners will consider the new submission and leave the public out of the dialogue.

"The passage of time will bear on everything," said Elaine Kennedy, a member of the Southbridge Towers board of directors. "I don't think that HHC has the time to go through nine different design incarnations for the Water Street lot like Milstein did." The Howard Hughes Corporation could build a 120-foot-tall tower right now. The zoning would permit that. "Saul [Sherl] has been heard to say he would just build as of right at some point," Kennedy said. "We can only hope that is true but I doubt it."

Almost a half century ago, the Landmarks Preservation Commission designated the South Street Seaport as a New York City Historic District. As the Designation Report said, the historic district celebrates a relatively small area that established New York City as the dominant port in America and, therefore, its dominant financial center. It is unique because of that history, and because of its beauty and charm. Importantly it is one of the few historic districts that has significance for the entire City; it is a place that unites us.

The Report recorded that a strong common characteristic of the District is the uniformity of its scale. It is defined by “the small-scale brick buildings that contrast dramatically with the soaring skyscrapers nearby.” The Report also noted that the designated area included a significant number of empty potential sites. Nothing in the Report suggested that these should not be built upon. But everything suggested that what might be built should be compatible with the character and scale of the district. It was not designated with a view to allowing creeping infusion of “soaring skyscrapers” to spoil its character, even at its outer borders. To the contrary, the designation contemplated a distinct line between an extremely important historical era and the quite different tempo, excitement, modernity and awesomeness of today. To mix them would be to diminish both. To honor the line would be to promote both.

The Report also credited the South Street Seaport Museum with the enormous contributions it had made toward preserving the District and perpetuating its character.

The Museum should be nurtured in every reasonable way — but not at the expense of the District’s essential scale and character.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission is a great institution. It also has, by law, a limited scope. Its duty is to designate aesthetically and culturally important sites to be preserved, and to allow improvements and even new construction provided they are appropriate and consistent. To that end, it must abide by its legislatively established limits. It may and must consider appropriateness and consistency in terms of aesthetic and architectural issues and the goal of maintaining character and scale. It cannot properly make decisions on the basis of what is politically or socially desirable.

The Commission’s reputation, and therefore its strength, depend on its unfailing dedication to preservation and restoration. To reach a decision on the basis that it will result in a large endowment to an important constituent of the District at the price of compromising (to say the least) appropriate standards for scale and design in the District, can only result in a damaging compromise of the Commission’s own stature and its powers.

Approving the currently proposed height and bulk for a structure at 250 Water St. would establish a legal precedent that would have to be followed in the future. When developers, who will have seen the Commission bend, propose the next South Street Seaport project, and the one after that, and after that, each could point to the Commission’s approval of the 250 Water St. project and the binding precedent it established. If the Commission argued that each prior project was unique and couldn't be compared to the last, the Commission, sadly, would lose because the winning argument would be that the Commission had abandoned the past.

The current proposal, like the last, is inappropriate. It should be rejected.

We welcome letters to the editor. We reserve the right to edit them for clarity and length. Send them to [email protected]

Many of the Downtown Post NYC bulletin board listings are now on the Downtown Post NYC website. To see the bulletin board listings, click here.

It's never too late to give someone (or yourself?) a gift. Té Company's tearoom at 163 West 10th St. is open from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m. on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays for tea and snacks to go. In addition, you can order tea and cookies (plus other gifts) online, For more information on Té Company, click here.

The exhibition "Auschwitz: Not Long Ago. Not Far Away" opened at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in Battery Park City in May 2019. It will close on May 2, 2021.

The exhibition of more than 700 original objects and 400 photographs was assembled from over 20 institutions and museums around the world. It is the most comprehensive exhibition dedicated to the history of Auschwitz and its role in the Holocaust ever presented in North America.

At Auschwitz between May 1940 and January 1945, one million Jews and tens of thousands of others were murdered. Victims included Polish political prisoners, gypsies ( properly called "Sinti" and "Roma"), Soviet POWs, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and those the Nazis deemed “homosexual,” “disabled,” “criminal,” “inferior,” or adversarial.

Most of the people who were deported to Auschwitz were systematically murdered. Those kept as prisoners were stripped of their names, assigned numbers, and subjected to forced labor and brutal — frequently deadly — conditions. Much of the world remained silent in the face of Nazi horrors.

The exhibition explores the dual identity of the camp as a physical location — the largest documented mass murder site in human history — and as a symbol of the borderless manifestation of hatred and human barbarity. People were deported to Auschwitz from all over Europe. Of these barely 400,000 were actually registered and imprisoned in the compound. The vast majority — approximately 900,000 people — were gassed and cremated within hours of arrival.

And yet survey after survey has shown that many people, especially Gen Z and millennial Americans, have never heard of the Holocaust or think that the number of Jews who were killed has been exaggerated.

"Auschwitz: Not long ago. Not far away" includes hundreds of personal items such as suitcases, eyeglasses and shoes that belonged to survivors and Auschwitz victims. Among other artifacts are concrete posts that were part of the fence of the Auschwitz camp; fragments of an original barrack for prisoners from the Auschwitz III-Monowitz camp; a desk and other possessions of the first and the longest serving Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss; a gas mask used by the SS; Picasso’s Lithograph of a Prisoner; and an original German-made Model 2 freight train car used for the deportation of Jews to the ghettos and extermination camps in occupied Poland.

Equally shocking, the exhibition contains artifacts and photographs that depict the world of the perpetrators — SS men who created and operated the largest of the German Nazi concentration and extermination camps.

The Museum of Jewish Heritage at 36 Battery Place, is open Sundays through Fridays. Timed entry tickets are available for "Auschwitz: Long ago. Not far away." All tickets must be reserved online in advance of your visit. For more information and to buy tickets, click here.

Every year, the Museum of Jewish Heritage holds an Annual Gathering of Remembrance, bringing together thousands of people to say: we will never forget. We owe it to our people, ourselves and our children to insist that when we mourn the millions of people who were murdered and comfort those who suffered, we tell their stories with the utmost respect for their human dignity. It is a powerful answer to the Nazis' thwarted ambition.

This year’s virtual gathering in observance of Yom HaShoah (Holocaust Remembrance Day) will take place on Sunday, April 11 at 2 p.m. Featured speakers include Second Gentleman Douglas Emhoff; U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer; Elisha Wiesel, son of the late Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel; Dr. Ruth K. Westheimer, Museum Trustee and Holocaust survivor; and more.

To register for the Annual Gathering of Remembrance, click here.

Attendance is free but a donation of any amount is appreciated. It will help fund the museum's exhibitions, student field trips, and other educational programs. Help the Museum of Jewish Heritage to ensure that future generations never forget the history and lessons of the Holocaust.