|
2016 Session: Week 2 Delegate Trent Kittleman - District 9A
|
Highlights of Week 2
Governor Hogan vetoed only a handful of the 692 bills passed last year. I stood with Governor Hogan and voted to sustain his vetoes. Unfortunately, the leaders in the House and Senate put politics in front of common sense.
|
|
The bills included:
- A bill that will allow felons to vote before they have completed their sentences,
- A bill that prevents law enforcement from pulling over a driver they see smoking marijuana, and
- A bill that allows immediate seizure of property, an action that police use to seize the money of drug dealers.
The only hold out is the Felon Voting bill in the Senate. While the veto was overridden in the House, Senate President Miller lacks the votes to override the Governor's veto and is waiting for a vacant Senate seat to be appointed before bringing it up for a vote. Vetoes must be overridden by both chambers. To see how the members voted, click the links below: Felon Voting: House Vote Marijuana Bill: House Vote Seizure and Forfeiture: House Vote Travel Tax House Vote
|
Bills of Interest . . . or Interesting Bills
|
Over 200 bills have been filed in the House at this point -- of the 3,000 or s that have been requested.
HB 88 You might be happy to know that some of your legislators have proposed this bill to prohibit automated cars from going out on the road by themselves. They must be accompanied by a licensed adult, ready to take over at a moments notice. . . sort of like student driver requirements.
HB 106
This is another in the series of bills designed to expand rights of criminals. This bill puts ex-convicts into "reentry-into-society status" and on par with all of the other "protected classes" -- race, color, religion, sex, family status, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity and disability -- for the purpose of "fair housing." It extends the protection of "non-discrimination" to ex-convicts to buy, rent or lease residential space anywhere -- even in an owner-occupied single family household. For example, when your oldest child goes to college, and you need to rent his room to help with tuition, you would now be required by law to rent to an ex-felon, regardless of his or her crime. The only "protection" written into the law is the provision that you need not rent to someone whose tenancy would constitutes a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals, or result in substantial physical damage to the property of others. But who makes that determination?
HB 109 Requires every local school system to include a la carte food and drink items on their monthly dining menus.
HB 111 Requires any individual who sells a dog or a cat to provide the buyer with a health certificate, dated no more than 30 days before the sale, from a licensed veterinarian, and to disclose any illness, disease, or condition that the seller knows or should have known about at the time of sale. Violating this law a criminal misdemeanor with a fine up to $1,000. Commercial, non-profit and government entities are not covered by the bill.
HB116 Delegate Tony O'Donnell has put in a bill to repeal the automatic consumer-price-index increase on gasoline that the last administration adoptedThis was one of Governor Hogan's initiatives last year. It's not likely to pass, but it's important to make the effort.
HB 197
The "Maryland Pay Stub Transparency Act of 2016." Despite the fact that businesses - particularly small businesses - name over-regulation as their number one concern, we still see bills like this. This bill does the following:
-
Requires wage records to be kept now for at least 3 years (with a penalty of up to$2,500)
-
Expands the types of wage records that employers are required to keep
-
Requires employers to give employees a specified written notice within one week after the first date of employment
-
Expands the information that employers are required to give to employees at the time of hiring and for each pay period
-
Requires employers to provide employees with an explanation of how wages were calculated, initially and upon the request of an employee
-
Requires notices to be provided in a language other than English and any other language deemed necessary.
-
Expands causes of action, and who can bring suit
-
Increases awards and liquidated damage penalties
HB 177 This bill is titled, "Prohibition on Marking Flags - Repeal." I thought it might be a bad bill, but when I read it, I'm glad the sponsors put it in. Otherwise, might be in cahoots with criminals! Apparently, it's currently illegal to sell, manufacture, give, or possess for sale or give an article of merchandise on which a flag is produced . . . to . . .decorate . . . the merchandise. The way I read this, all of our tee shirts, scarfs, jewelry, and other wearable apparel decorated with the Maryland flag (or the U.S. flag) would be banned.
HB 178 "Roadside Trees - Preservation and Protection. This bill takes a perfectly good law to protect roadside trees and turns it into an environmental nightmare. The first sign is a new "policy" provision. The first section lists the environmental and ecological benefits, with five specific benefits outlined in subsections. The second, one-sentence section acknowledges that there are some "social and economic benefits." The new law specifically eliminates the option of maintaining or removing a roadside tree "for the purpose of improving the general aesthetic appearance of the right-of-way." Another new provision now prohibits a person not just from maintaining or removing a roadside tree, but also "or in any manner injur[ing] a roadside tree." Next comes the imposition of a fee - of $250 -- for the permit that is required to maintain or remove a roadside tree. And finally, the bill introduces yet another reporting requirement, requiring the Department of Natural Resources to issue an annual report to the General Assembly that gives the number of permits issued, what they were for, and any enforcement actions taken.
|
|
|
|
|
|