“Why did the egg not hatch?
Because it was a chicken.”
Hopefully, this brings the same grin to your face as it did when our church pastor told this joke to the congregation. While I don’t recall this joke as having had anything to do with the actual sermon/homily, it did serve as a reminder that we need to take some time to laugh and breathe. In speaking with many of you, you are busier than ever. Finding employees is nearly impossible. High gas prices, inflation, decreasing 401k values, and, in Texas, a direct jump from winter to summer, does not help. However, this is not the first time that we have felt overwhelmed. It is just a cycle that we know we will successfully overcome. Until then, it is important to find joy in the little things, whether it is a trial victory, a settled case, or even a timely report from a defense counsel (of course, at FFSS, we pride ourselves on timeliness). Whether it is great legal work or just a wish to laugh, I encourage you to contact any of us at Fletcher Farley. I am confident that our attorneys will bring you a sense of peace during a chaotic moment in the claims/litigation process and when the timing is right, make you smile.
|
Technology Success
Doug Fletcher and Derreck Brown recently settled a pedestrian fatality case which was pending in Austin, Texas. We were initially contacted by the client immediately after the accident and were able to dispatch our Rapid Response team. Derreck Brown worked with our accident reconstruction partner, Aperture LLC, and we were able to record the accident scene and obtain video footage of the actual accident from cameras mounted on nearby businesses.
The accident involved our client company driver making a right on red turn onto a busy thoroughfare. Unfortunately, at the same time he made the turn, the decedent was attempting to cross in front of his path of travel on a protected crosswalk signal. Obviously, the liability was extremely problematic, but our driver testified that as required by law, he had initially looked to his left, looked to his right, and then looked to the left again to observe oncoming traffic before making his turn. During an inspection of the scene, it became apparent that there were a number of objects along the sidewalk leading up to the crosswalk that would have blocked the driver’s view. Thus, we wanted to be a position to show the jury that the driver could have done everything required under the law and the accident still could have happened.
We produced a reenactment video which included an actual visualization from the point of our driver’s eyesight and included an actual rendition of what our driver could have seen for the ten to fifteen seconds prior to the accident. We were able to have our accident reconstruction expert, using an Oculus visual device, actually display what our driver would have seen. Using this cutting-edge technology, as well as good old-fashioned cross-examination of the Plaintiffs’ accident reconstruction expert, wherein he admitted that based upon the videos the Plaintiff did not exhibit reasonable precaution before entering into the crosswalk, we were able to achieve a successful settlement during mediation.
We plan to discuss this case during our firm’s upcoming Texas Law Update this fall and we think you will be very impressed with the present state of the available technology in the field of accident reconstruction. Once again, our Rapid Response team provided great value to our client and allowed us to achieve an excellent result.
|
Is There Any Room for New
Duties on Insurers?
|
In Elephant Ins. Co. v. Kenyon, 2022 WL 1202307 (Tex. 2022), the Texas Supreme Court decided that an insurer owed no duty to its insured when the husband was killed while taking post-accident photos.
Lorraine Kenyon was in a single car accident after striking a guardrail. After the accident, she called her insurer to report the accident. Kenyon inquired on the subject of photographs and was told to go ahead and take some by the adjuster. No further advice was given. Kenyon’s husband arrived at the scene and was struck by another vehicle, resulting in his death, as he was taking photographs. Lorraine sued her insurer alleging that due to their special relationship, the insurer had a duty of good faith and fair dealing which the insurer breached when it advised the insured to take photographs of the scene. Further, she alleged that if such a duty did not exist, one arose when the insurer acted affirmatively to guide her through the post-accident claims process.
The court found that the insurer’s duty of good faith and fair dealing was not implicated by the facts of the case because the carrier was not engaged in any aspect of claims handling when it told the insured she should take some pictures. The court reasoned that imposing a new duty on insurers to refrain from suggesting post-accident photographs or doing so only with accompanied safety warnings would place a burden of liability on the insurer for acts of third parties beyond its control. Imposing this new duty would open the door for insurers to be potentially liable for everything that happens during the claims process.
The court also noted the insurer did not voluntarily undertake any obligation to protect the insured or her husband from harm when it responded yes to a question about taking photographs. Therefore, there was no legal basis for a negligent undertaking claim.
Today, because of the considerable degree of laws and regulations, it is likely that courts in Texas will leave the question of additional duties for insurers to the legislature or an administrative agency. However, we recommend carefully reviewing policies related to post-accident instructions and advice.
|
Conflicts Resolved
Fletcher Farley Obtains Dismissal
|
Karen Kennedy and Claire Kimutis tried a slip and fall case to a jury and obtained a complete win for the defense. The Plaintiff alleged she fell in the bathroom of a restaurant after the employees mopped the floor and failed to put out a “wet floor” sign. Using video surveillance of the restaurant lobby along with inconsistent statements by the Plaintiff, we were able to cast doubt on the Plaintiff’s version of events inside the bathroom. The jury unanimously found that the Defendant was not liable. Judgment for the Defendant was entered that the Plaintiff take nothing by her suit and is ordered to pay the Defendant’s court costs.
|
|
Celebrating and welcoming...
|
The arrival of
a sweet baby girl,
CONGRATULATIONS
Shiloh Rose Wentworth
6 lbs. 4 oz.
Born May 12, 2022
|
Honoring 30 Years with Acts of Kindness
|
This year marks 30 years of delivering legal services for Fletcher Farley. We know the importance of community and our team sees this as our way to give back to all of those that has shaped us into what we are today.
|
In April our Austin team participated in an Easter basket donation project for kids at SAFE Austin, an organization that advocates and participates in crisis intervention for victims of abuse.
|
Our Dallas team participated in "Serve Day" with Direction 61:3, who work with foster youth transitioning into adulthood. Our team worked to help with landscaping as well as interior and exterior cleaning at three homes on their new property, "The Farm."
|
Hilary Childress
5/3 - 12 years
Sue Leffingwell
5/14 - 15 years
Teresa Valcoviak
5/17 - 1 year
Alexis Fuller
5/18 - 6 years
Leslie Jaeger
5/24 - 1 year
Brandon Wentworth
5/28 - 7 years
Thank you for being an essential part of our success. Happy Anniversary!
|
If you want more information or have questions, please contact:
Doug Fletcher
Firm Managing Partner
214-987-9600
Joanna Salinas
Austin Office Managing Partner
512-476-5300
|
|