CLICK HERE TO VIEW ONLINE PARISH CALENDAR

Thursday, April 23rd, 2026

The Undiscovered Country

Stick with me for a moment while I muse about an odd bit of trivia. I promise, there’s a worthy reflection afterwards!

Here’s something you need to be a nerd in several ways to know: in December of 1991, a Star Trek movie came out in theatres. Numbered as “Star Trek VI,” this film bore the title, “The Undiscovered Country.”

That name was … unusual. Longtime fans will know that Star Trek drew heavily from Shakespearean stories and language – a half dozen episode titles, plots, or characters are fairly direct references. Plenty of cast members had experience in Shakespearean plays. And by the sixth film with the “Original Series” cast, Shakespeare had been directly quoted several times in the films.

So it wasn’t particularly odd to see a feature film pull in a Shakespearean subtitle. What was odd about it was that THIS particular subtitle was taken into a very different meaning.

It shows up in the middle of a toast between longtime galactic enemies – the alien Klingon Empire and the human-led Federation of Planets. During a tense peace negotiation, a Klingon general declares a toast to “The Undiscovered Country.” The Vulcan Spock, whose mind is as good as any computer, identifies this phrase as coming from Hamlet … act three, scene one. The Klingons – in an infamous Star Trek joke – declare that “You have not experienced Shakespeare until you have read him in the original Klingon.” In the interests of the fragile and fledgling peace talks, this belligerently incorrect history is allowed to stand.

That said … no character corrects the full quotation from the Klingon general, who offers, “a toast: ‘The Undiscovered Country’ … the future!”

In the film, all the characters are willing to drink to that … but it’s not the correct understanding of the metaphor: Shakespeare’s Danish prince didn’t mean “the future” when he described the Undiscovered Country.

In the (human) original speech from Hamlet, the Undiscovered Country is referred to in the famous “To Be or Not To Be” soliloquy. The young and angst-filled Prince Hamlet, agonizing about whether life itself is worth living, speculates in frustration that the only thing that keeps people suffering the pains of living (which he lists by name at some length) is the dread of something worse after death … “the undiscovered country, from whose bourn no traveler returns” – a dread that “puzzles the will, and makes us rather bear the ills we have than to fly to others that we know not of.” For Hamlet, it’s the unknowability of death and what’s after that forces abiding in the life he finds so terrible.

And so the Star Trek scene stands out. Part of it is watching this melodramatic cast (nobody accuses William Shatner of understated performances) change the meaning of the original. Part of it is the elegance of seeing Shakespeare’s words wield a staying power into this imagined 23rd Century.

But there’s a third layer, which has to do with when this movie was released.

December 1991, the very month the film was released, was the formal end of the Soviet Union. Things had been trending that way for years, but it was Christmas Day in 1991 that Gorbachev resigned as president, and the flag of the Russian federation was raised over the Kremlin in Moscow. The following day the Soviet Union was formally dissolved.

Star Trek VI was, in many ways, a meditation on this. What did conversations towards peace look like between superpowered rivals? The film had its own version of a Malta Summit (and a plot revolving around a bellicose rogue actor trying to derail it back into open hostilities). The major antagonist, General Chang, even directly notes at one point, “there’s no need to mince words: in space, all warriors are cold warriors.”

But what, then, of the Undiscovered Country? For Shakespeare’s Hamlet, this term was a metaphor for Death. But the film’s Klingon antagonist changes the meaning to “The Future” instead.

This is where I think the “mistake” gets interesting. Because, when we get down to it … a changed future is always the death of the present.

That was certainly true of the Cold War world that Star Trek was mirroring: the reborn Russian Federation rose from the ashes of the Soviet Union (as did the various conquered or participant countries that had added to the ranks of the onetime superpower). A number of resurrections came forth from the death of that superpower. And it’s hard to imagine a moment of greater fear – and then a greater daring to hope – than the end of the Cold War and its nuclear threats.

I’m very mindful here that death and new life are a central understanding of how Christians view entering into covenantal life with God and neighbor. The earliest metaphors of baptism are literally a death to one life in order to rise to another. Early baptismal fonts involved walking down into deep water and being submerged within it, to physically model a drowning before being raised out of the water – traditionally with the help of another – to walk up stairs on the opposite side of the font and into new life.

But if Hamlet’s Death is a “country from whose bourn no traveler returns” … Christian faith breaks that absolute. Jesus, returning from death, tells us of a life to come. Jesus invites us to consider beginning it in the here and now. Jesus joins deathlessness and future in the moments in which we are presently alive. We’re invited to live the resurrection even before our death. We’re invited to enter the future before we leave the present. The traveler has returned (underlined by the foreshadowing of such parables as the bridesmaids with their lamps in Matthew 25, or the rich man who ignored Lazarus but yearns for his family to be warned by the message of one sent back from the dead in Luke 16).

The news has been proclaimed. The undiscovered country has a rich and abundant life in it. We need not be bound by Hamlet’s dread, but neither do we need to leap towards death to arrive at resurrection: the new life is already available, in full view in the way of God who entered this world and this age, who tore in two the curtain that hid the presence of the Lord, and who left the stone of a tomb rolled back so we could behold its emptiness.

Friends, we’re living in an anxious age. The undiscovered country of the future we’re moving towards together does have a share of the dread Hamlet spoke of: I speak regularly with people who are worried that tomorrow will be worse than today has been. In the face of an unknown future, we see the temptation to be the Hebrew people in Exodus, complaining that the wilderness feels threatening and at least in oppressive Egypt we knew where the next meal was coming from. We hear others modeling the General Changs of Star Trek, looking for a war to rebuild a bloody empire instead of trying to understand what’s needed among us together to work for peace. We see a world afflicted by tools we thought would bring progress, and we don’t yet know how to heal it. There is real work to be done.

Within that, I’m an optimist. Not because I don’t take seriously that the trials of our own age might become as great as the wilderness wanderings after Egypt, or the worst wars of any generation. Not because I imagine that the desire for civil progress can outpace the bloodlust for civil war in our moment, simply because we’ve seen the consequences of giving in to the latter too many times already.



But perhaps instead, because I believe that the human family truly has been faced with dread as great as ours in past generations. The Cold War is not so long past that living generations have forgotten how it felt. Walls across our own Berlins can be toppled. Empires can collapse under the weight of their own insistence on absolute supremacy. Human hearts that cry for care and compassion can make their voices heard.

Ultimately, we will choose which Undiscovered Countries we will visit on our journey as the human family. Some hold death, and dread, it’s true. But others hold life and abundance we have not yet committed to have or to share. And while the cost of the journey is, always, our very lives, what awaits us is still in some portion a matter of our own choice and control. We can navigate towards the better things. We can walk towards resurrection. And the living God who has made us and called us beloved has showed us that if we can stride

towards loving God, and loving neighbor as we love ourselves, what we will discover is the country of life.