North Penn Bridge Bulletin

Greetings to the

North Penn Bridge Community!

Week of 09/22/2025

This Week At North Penn


Mon, 09/22

Tue, 09/23

Wed, 09/24

Thu, 09/25

Fri, 09/26 AM

Fri, 09/26 PM

Sat, 09/27

Open

0-1500

Open

Open

0-750

Open pizza game

Open Joann Glasson game

Hope to see everyone this Saturday, September 27 for lunch and bridge with Joann Glasson!

Education


Joann Glasson's final September Zoom class will be held on Monday, September 29 at 10:00 a.m. See flyer for details.

Deal Analysis

by Andy Kaufman



Oh My! What A Difference A Lead Makes - Part 7


Continuing our series on the “art” of opening leads for Suit Contracts; as well as, for No Trump Contracts, I am presenting two deals from a recent Sectional Swiss Team event. As previously discussed, one always must consider many factors including: the auction, vulnerability, strength of opponents and form of scoring (matchpoints vs. imps). Hope those previous pointers have given you food for thought and improved your results at the table. Since opening leads are partly art and partly science one never gets this right on every hand. All to hope for is that stopping to think and considering your opening leads based on all information available will continue to improve your results. Today we will take a look at opening leads from two deals. One is an example deal and the other occurred during a recent Swiss Team event. In previous articles we reviewed opening leads at matchpoints and then specifically versus Notrump contracts. So let us first review a few opening lead pointers at Swiss/imps contests.


  • In general, the same lead advise reviewed in prior articles is still applicable whether playing matchpoints or imps. (See earlier installments)
  • The biggest difference is at matchpoints you want to make the “best” lead based on all the information from the auction, with objective of not making it easy on declarer and not giving up any overtricks.  At imps, you may want to consider making a riskier lead providing the best chance of setting the contract most usually against a game or slam contract only. This is true since the risk versus reward of setting these contracts at imps outweighs the potential of giving up overtricks.
  • One must consider carefully when to diverge from the “normal” indicated lead.
  • A common example is leading of and Ax or Kx holding versus a suit game contract. This may give best chance of getting a ruff(s) in the suit before declarer has time to draw trumps.  Still be mindful that is usually best if from an unbid suit or one that partner has bid in the auction.   You should avoid this lead when holding natural trump tricks (ie. Q10xx behind declarer), since now your Hx lead is more likely to give away tricks.


Deal #9: Let’s look at an example hand where you decide to lead your Kx against a 2H partial contract versus your “normal” lead.  Here is your hand as West and the auction…….


What is your choice of leads at imp’s and why?  Decide before reading on.

10983

J83

K6

A982

Reasoning & Results:  This is a part score contract at imps and neither you nor partner has competed in the auction. Partner is marked with some values since you only hold 8 HCP’s and opponents have not invited game.  At first glance you may think that the Kx lead is reasonable to find partner with the Ace to score a heart ruff.  Remember that this is not a game contract, so no heroics are called for to try to set this contract.  On this deal if you decided to make this lead then opponents will make 11 tricks for +230.  Correctly deciding to make your “normal” spade 10 lead will actually set the 2H contract for a -50.  See the actual deal below to demonstrate when not to lead your Kx holding.  On the spade 10 lead, partner wins the Ace then switches to clubs. Upon winning the 3rd club you continue the suit providing an unnecessary ruff and sluff but creating a trump promotion when partner plays the heart 10. Later you will also score your diamond K for the sixth defensive trick.

Analysis: This hand provides some implications when reviewing the auction and your trump holding prior to deciding on your opening lead.  This one is not 100% straight forward. What you do know is that dummy will likely have at most one spade while showing 10 minor suit cards and likely heart stopper. I believe there are two reasonable choices on this deal. Leading the unbid heart suit may be right but you don’t really have any help in that suit.  The other choice would be the normal J of diamonds lead since leading trumps is out of the question and leading a doubleton club may help to set up clubs and you don’t need ruffs having 2 natural trump tricks.  At the table East lead a heart which did not set the contract with declarer able to come to 10 tricks. The only winning lead on the deal is the J of diamonds which takes out a vital entry to dummy needed for pitches on clubs after taking the ruffing finesse.


Reasoning & Results:   Either a heart lead or diamond J lead could have been right on this deal. Unfortunately, if you didn’t find the diamond J lead your side goes -620.   North would have been better suited to pass 3NT which can’t be set. Here is the full deal….

Until next time, happy leading!

Ask the Expert



 Email your questions, or a pesky hand, or something you’d like to know about bidding or playing to Toysie Walker. She will forward them to the panel, one will be chosen, and the question and answers will be printed in the following week’s newsletter.

70% Club

Wed, Sep 03

72%

Elaine Clair & John Dickenson

September Birthdays

Pat Andrews

Diane Basile

Lorna Bearn

Michelle Clemens

James Dowling

Deborah Farkas

Nancy Gerhardt

Edward Heater

Carole Levin

Joyce Levin

John Moser

Patricia Mueller

Bin Qiang

Ed Ritvo

Donna Saffren

Dale Scafuro

Sue Shaffer

Larry Umphlet

Jack Wilkinson

North Penn Duplicate Bridge Club

(215) 699-4932

NorthPennBridge@gmail.com