View as webpage

Notice of House Bill 186 reimbursement overpayment 

In the last week, you received a communication from us about state reimbursement anomalies because of House Bill (HB) 186. It explained that the methodology laid out in HB 186 for calculating the Inflation Cap Credit (ICC) reimbursements resulted in payment discrepancies statewide.



You are receiving this message because preliminary data indicates that your district received an overpayment. It is likely that the state will expect this overpayment to be repaid. You should not assume your district will keep any part of an overpayment. This is particularly important if you are engaged in negotiations or planning a significant permanent improvement. Districts should consult with their legal and financial advisers about how best to manage these funds until the issue has been resolved.

Additional information about HB 186 and the ICC 


HB 186, effective March 20, 2026, was one piece of several recently passed property tax reforms. The bill caps property tax growth on voted levies to inflation for school districts or JVSDs at the 20 mill or 2 mill floors, respectively. The ICC calculation is inflation-based by capping property tax growth to the rate of inflation as measured by a federal index. The credits are to be recalculated every three years when a county goes through a reappraisal or update.  

The state was to reimburse school districts for credits given relating to tax years 2023 and 2024 in counties that had reappraisals or updates (districts that went through reappraisal or update in tax year 2025 are not impacted by the reimbursement provision). However, the ICC amounts given to taxpayers within a school district and reimbursement amounts provided to the school district in most cases did not match. This is because, instead of simply matching the district’s reimbursements to the ICC payments made, the law required separate calculation formulas for each. These calculations yielded differing results.  


In concept, the reimbursement was to ensure that, until they went through a reappraisal or update, districts would not receive less property tax revenue than they received in tax year 2024. However, the reimbursement calculated “taxes charged and payable” in the current year versus tax year 2024. This calculation does not account for what may have happened in the interim, such as levies going on or off and budget commissions refusing to collect an otherwise approved levy.   

As a result, some districts have received less reimbursement than the ICC withdrew from their revenues. And some districts received more reimbursement than the ICC withdrew. A preliminary analysis indicates the net result statewide was nearly $39 million in overpayments and $15 million in underpayments.

Again, BASA, OASBO and OSBA are working with the General Assembly and the County Auditors’ Association of Ohio to identify a legislative fix with the goal of action in the lame duck session before the end of the calendar year.  

 

If you have any questions or wish to discuss this issue further, please contact us, and we will be happy to assist you.


Questions? Contact:

Nicole Piscitani, OSBA — (614) 540-4000

Paul Imhoff, BASA — (614) 846-4080 

Katie Johnson, OASBO — (614) 431-9116

Facebook  Instagram  LinkedIn  X  YouTube