Aligned Grey and White.png


Monthly Update



October 24, 2025

What Americans really think about education

Perception versus reality


Earlier this month, some of the Aligned team joined hundreds of policy and advocacy leaders at the PIE Network conference in Atlanta.


One of the most insightful sessions featured new national polling on how voters view public education. The findings indicate certain areas of reassuring agreement, while also revealing significant discrepancies between individuals' subjective perceptions and objective reality.


The polling, conducted jointly by Impact Research (D) and UpOne Insights (R), surveyed 1,015 registered voters nationwide from August 21–27, 2025, with additional oversamples of Democratic and Republican primary voters (each about 800 respondents). The margin of error is ±3.5%. Responses were collected through an online opt-in panel designed to reflect national demographics by region, age, race, and political affiliation.

The results


One of our biggest takeaways was the widening perception gap between parents’ understanding of student performance and the actual data.


Only 10% of parents believe their child is below grade level in reading or math. Whether we look at NAEP results or state results (see more for Kansas and Missouri), more than 50% of our students in early grades are below grade level (proficiency).


Although this optimism expressed by parents is understandable — who wants to say their child is behind — it’s hard to not see this as a complicating dynamic for efforts to rally urgency around early literacy and numeracy. It motivates us to increase transparency and advocate for change for our students.


The poll also dispels a common myth: voters overwhelmingly support annual testing. More than 9 out of 10 Americans agree that it’s important to test students every year and use those results to identify struggling students and schools.


Perhaps your initial reaction is “well, duh!” However, as we talked about in our previous newsletter, rising skepticism towards assessments and accountability as a policy idea is real right now. Far from rejecting accountability and assessments, the public still wants evidence that progress is monitored and measured.


When it comes to what public education should prioritize, the public remains clear. Respondents want to ensure that every student is on grade level in reading, math, and writing and view it as the most important goal.


That focus on the fundamentals aligns with the ongoing reforms and renewed attention to literacy and math proficiency in districts and statehouses across the country — but more is needed to secure results.


Finally, the poll finds continued consensus around fair funding: 85% of voters agree that school resources should be distributed based on student need and local funding capacity, with broad opposition to cutting education budgets.


Interested in looking at the rest of the results? Check out the full poll slide show here.


Aligned’s Take: These results show that while national debates can seem polarized — and respondents agree, with “too much politics” seen as the biggest problem in education today — the public’s expectations remain consistent: emphasize the fundamentals, be honest with data, and provide fair investment.

Missouri News

Missouri K-12 funding talks enter crucial phase


The School Funding Modernization Task Force reached the midpoint of its working group process. The four groups — each focused on a different component of the foundation formula — are now in discussion about potential changes that could shape a final recommendation for the future of how the state funds public education.


Led by former Deputy Commissioner of Financial & Administrative Services Kari Monsees, the groups will present draft recommendations to the full task force in December, with final full funding formula proposals due to Governor Mike Kehoe by December 2026.


What the working groups are considering


The student count group has the highest degree of consensus for potential changes to the formula. Members increasingly agree on fully utilizing enrollment-based funding following the passage of S.B. 727 in 2024, which will gradually shift funding based on a hybrid of attendance and enrollment by 2029.


Members of the student count group also explored eliminating “funding cliffs” by applying student weights for all qualifying students, not just those above a set threshold. What’s more, they discussed testing a multi-tiered special education weighting system tied to service intensity.


By contrast, the funding targets group is confronting a big task with a less-than-clear path forward. The group is examining adjustments to the state adequacy target (SAT), the legal definition for the minimum amount of funding per student for an adequate education.


For reference, most other states simply determine a base amount of funding per student in law; Missouri uses an opaque calculation based on spending from 10 “performance districts” to determine the SAT.


One idea floated was to alter the current model to use the top 100 scoring districts based on the state’s accountability framework, find their average expenditures, and divide based on weighted membership of certain student populations. This approach would make the measure more stable and reflective of student need, though preliminary modeling suggests it could raise the target to roughly $10,367 per student.


Monsees noted that such an increase would likely be offset by recalculating the local contribution districts are expected to make, but by how much remains the key question.


The local effort group is grappling with how to better account for district wealth. Members agreed that the current system’s reliance on property valuations from 2004 is outdated and distorts equity across communities. The group has discussed incorporating multiple factors — beyond property tax data — to more accurately reflect local revenue capacity and to ensure that wealthier districts contribute appropriately.


Finally, the performance incentive group is still early in its work but has discussed tying small bonuses to student literacy and math outcomes, particularly in grades three and eight, like what Tennessee has enacted.


Aligned’s Take: These discussions reflect several of the suggestions that Bellwether and Aligned made to the full task force earlier this year. Overall, we would like to see a proposal that emphasizes the following:

  • A base amount of funding that is more transparent and consistent;
  • The use of enrollment instead of attendance, with additional funding for English language learners and low-income students without thresholds;
  • A multi-tiered system for special education funding; and,
  • An update to the property values used to determine local effort.


Missouri report calls for expanded career technical education


A new statewide report recommends a series of steps to modernize Missouri’s career and technical education (CTE) system — from expanding career exploration in early grades to strengthening partnerships between schools and employers.


The recommendations come from a work group of K-12, higher education, and business leaders convened under Executive Order 25-16, issued by Governor Mike Kehoe in January 2025. The Governor charged the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development with reviewing the state’s CTE system and proposing improvements.


The Governor’s Workforce of the Future Challenge Report outlines three major priority areas:


1. Strengthen work-based learning and employer engagement.

The report calls for a statewide work-based learning innovation grant, new incentives for registered apprenticeships, and a central online toolkit to connect schools and employers.


These initiatives aim to expand internships, apprenticeships, and job-shadowing opportunities, particularly in rural and high-need areas.


2. Expand early career exploration and advising systems.

The work group recommends converting DESE’s nine part-time regional career advisors for grades 5–12 into full-time roles and hiring nine additional full-time advisors for grades K–4 — a combined $1.5 million annual investment.


Other proposals include a digital K–12 career exploration toolkit, enhanced school counseling capacity, and a state-level K–8 CTE director to support implementation.


3. Launch a statewide CTE awareness campaign.

The plan envisions a sustained effort to promote CTE as a pathway to high-wage careers, using student success stories, employer testimonials, and data on workforce demand.


Public input gathered through a statewide survey of 5,650 Missourians underscored strong support for these ideas — over 90% viewed CTE positively and cited the need for better advising, early exposure, and stronger school-employer partnerships.


If adopted, these proposals could represent the most comprehensive update to Missouri’s CTE system in more than a decade, aligning career preparation with the state’s long-term workforce needs.


In other news


Kansas News

Annual report pushes for “coherence” amid achievement challenges


In his annual report to the Kansas State Board of Education, Commissioner of Education Dr. Randy Watson struck a theme of “coherence”—aligning Kansas’ academic standards, assessments, literacy training, and accreditation process under a single framework known as KESA 2.0.


The 2024-25 KSDE Annual Report, released this month, describes a systemwide effort to better connect the state’s major reform initiatives.


Structured literacy training for educators, new state assessment cut scores, and district improvement plans are all now organized around the Four Fundamentals of KESA:

  • Structured literacy
  • Standards alignment
  • Balanced assessment
  • Quality Instruction


Dr. Watson framed these efforts as essential for building trust and consistency across Kansas schools, noting that “True transformation happens when goals, resources, and strategies point in the same direction.”


Still, the data reflects both progress and stagnation. The statewide graduation rate rose slightly to 89.5%, continuing an upward trend since 2016. However, this comes in the context of widespread recognition of increased grade inflation, the near elimination of high school exit exams, all of which lead some analysts to question whether the graduation rate is an end-all be-all its made out to be.


Complicating matters even more is that academic performance remains flat, with the majority of students still scoring below grade-level benchmarks in reading and math. Kansas has made modest gains in moving students out of the lowest performance level, but proficiency rates remain stubbornly low.


Chronic absenteeism continues to weigh on recovery efforts as well. Nearly 1 in 5 Kansas students missed at least 10% of school days last year — an improvement from 2020-2023, but still well above historic averages. Educators also cite increasing numbers of students in special education and English language learners, adding complexity to classrooms and strain to district budgets.


At the same time, Kansas is deepening its investment in literacy and workforce development. By 2028, KSDE says most elementary teachers must demonstrate proficiency in structured literacy, a policy designed to strengthen early reading instruction.


The Registered Teacher Apprenticeship program has also expanded to 74 districts, helping create new pathways into the teaching profession amid widespread vacancies. The report mentions that teacher vacancies are down 21% from spring 2024 to this fall.


Ensuring postsecondary success remains a priority for KSDE. An increasing number of students are enrolled and receiving dual credit courses in high school: more than 40,000 as of 2025, up from 35,000 in 2023. The number of students taking exams is also steadily rising, with 16,652 exams taken and more than 75% of test takers receive a score of 3 or above.


However, no demographic information is provided, so equity of access to these opportunities remains a concern.


Dr. Watson, who recently announced his retirement, leaves behind an ambitious vision for a more coherent and aligned education system. His successor will inherit both a stronger structural foundation, with the challenge of translating it into measurable gains in student learning.


Aligned’s Take: Kansas has made real strides in building a more coherent education system. But coherence only matters if it produces results. The state’s new assessment cut scores, which have not been adequately communicated in full, will be a key part of transparency and trust. Policymakers and the public deserve a clear explanation of what these benchmarks mean for students’ ability to perform on grade level. Structural reform is important, but evidence of improved learning should be included and ongoing.


Aligned Completes 2025 Cradle to Career Listening Tour


Aligned has released the findings from its Kansas Cradle to Career Listening Tour, a four-month effort to hear directly from Kansans about what is working, what is not, and where education and workforce systems must better align.


Over the summer, the team traveled more than 1,000 miles and met with over 100 parents, teachers, business leaders, and community members, generating more than 160 ideas to strengthen the pathway from early learning to career success.


The conversations highlighted how interconnected Kansas’ challenges are—from child care and teacher retention to higher education and workforce needs. Participants consistently emphasized that these issues “rise and fall together,” and progress depends on collaboration across sectors.


The resulting report summarizes these insights and will help guide Aligned’s 2026 legislative priorities and partnerships with schools, employers, and policymakers.


Read the full report here.


In other news


Literacy in focus

Join us for our next Aligned Education Policy Webinar: K–12 Literacy – Policy and Outcomes — a virtual discussion on how state policy is shaping literacy instruction across Kansas and Missouri.


📅 Wednesday, November 12, 2025 | 12:00–1:00 PM CT

📍 Virtual Event


Register here!


Plus, read the first post in our new literacy blog series, exploring the major methods of teaching reading and the research behind them.

Note: Aligned will not have a newsletter for the month of November. 

Have a great weekend and happy early Halloween!







Torree Pederson

President

torree@wearealigned.org


Eric Syverson

Director of Policy & Research

erics@wearealigned.org

About Aligned


Aligned is the only state-wide non-profit, nonpartisan business group working in Kansas and Missouri on educational issues impacting the full development of our children, from supporting high-quality early learning to solid secondary programs that provide rigorous academic programs and real-world learning opportunities.


Our vision is that our public education systems in Kansas and Missouri have the resources and flexibility to prepare students to pursue the future of their choice.


We are currently focused on education policies that will strengthen early childhood education, teacher recruitment and retention, and school finance reform.


Learn more about our work.