The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared this Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Esmeralda Seven Solar Projects.
The BLM, Battle Mountain District Office is seeking comments on a programmatic-level environmental impact statement and resource management plan amendment to construct seven utility-scale photovoltaic solar facilities with battery energy storage systems on BLM-administered lands in Esmeralda County, Nevada. The seven proposed facilities would be geographically contiguous and encompass approximately 62,300 acres or 100 square miles of BLM-administered lands approximately 30 miles west of Tonopah, Nevada. The BLM is attempting to streamline the review of 7 massive solar facilities in one weakly written Environmental Impact Sttement. The BLM would change their regional Resource Management Plan and allow the solar developers to build their solar panels on 10 percent slopes. At this point, they are only allowed to build on 5 percent slopes. This will impact viewsheds, wildlife and surface hydrology.
The BLM will also need to "downgrade" the visual resources. How does BLM manage scenery? In this case, they would apply an industrial visual class called VRM Class IV to the entire region which would encourage major visual modifications to the landscape.
The projects would connect to the pending Greenlink West Transmission Line Esmeralda Substation which could transmit one gigawatt of energy, but there are far more projects proposed than there is capacity for.
The project site contains 12,000-year-old Clovis points and cultural sites, several plant communities and over 20 rare plants, one of the most important linkage areas for desert bighorn sheep, outstanding visual resources, pronghorn antelope, and the area contains Lands with Wilderness Characteristics.
In 2023, the Friends of Nevada Wilderness submitted a proposal to protect this part of the Big Smoky Valley as an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) instead of sacrificing it for large-scale energy sprawl. The Esmeralda/Fish Lake ACEC would protect 849,170 acres of public lands in the region and if designated, would prevent the solar construction from taking place. We are supporting this as an alternative to the projects. OR we are supporting a pause on the review of the project until the ACEC can be fully evaluated in a seperate public review. The BLM has said the proposal is not needed. We don't agree.
Other big impacts from these projects would be:
Building 279 miles of chain link fence
Large amounts of grading on 100 square miles
Removal of Vegetation on 49,000 acres
Over 10,000 acre feet of water needed for dust supression
Over 1,500 acres of wetlands in the planning area
Over 390 acres of lithium battery storage banks
Would create massive plumes of fugitive dust
Below is the list of the 7 solar projects
|