The process described by Jones that is needed to identify and copy all existing court records relating to a specific person may be tedious and require multiple steps; however, this is not akin to selecting certain information from multiple cases and then aggregating or reformulating that information into a new court record. The fact that the Bentonville Division uses what the circuit court referred to as an “antiquated” computer system does not change the nature of the information requested or transform existing court records into “compiled information.” While Jones relies on an Attorney General Opinion indicating that requests for background checks are governed by the compiled-information provisions of Order 19, these opinions are not binding precedent on this court.
A plain reading of Order 19 and its commentary support PBSA’s position that the July 2018 request by Courthouse Concepts was not one for compiled information. Accordingly, the July 2018 request was not governed by any of the access limitations described in Order 19, and the circuit court was correct in determining that the FOIA applied to the request…
We therefore affirm the circuit court’s award of summary judgment to PBSA on its FOIA claim.