Phase III of the Commodity Super-Cycle Is A Global Food Shortage

Gordon T Long Research exclusively located at MATASII.com

RESEARCH MAILING CONTROL CHANGES / SIGNUP

All questions should be directed to the lcmgroupe2@comcast.net

UnderTheLens - AUGUST 2022

Phase III of the Commodity Super-Cycle will be a Global Food Shortage

In the last Newsletter we discussed our expectations for Phase II of the Commodity Super-Cycle. Today we want to follow on with our expectations for Phase III. Indications are this will be a Global Food Crisis in soft commodities.

What we are increasingly witnessing is bureaucrats at the helm of what is becoming sovereign nation "Regulatory States". The "Chevron Doctrine" has now become the guiding approach for the implementation of strategies that are not supported by an electoral mandate.

UnderTheLens - 07 27 22 - AUGUST - Geo Politics of the Commodity Super Cycle

=========

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

THE COMING GLOBAL FOOD CRISIS IS PART OF AN ORCHESTRATED STRATEGY
THE UN (UNITED NATIONS) AND WEF (WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM) ARE IN PARTNERSHIP TO RE-ENGINEER GLOBAL FOOD SUPPLY AS PART OF "AGENDA 2030 - SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS" (SDG).
SEVERAL OF THE UN'S 17 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS ARE DIRECTLY IMPLICATED IN POLICIES THAT ARE SERIOUSLY CONSTRAINING FARMERS, RANCHERS AND FOOD SUPPLIES AROUND THE WORLD.
HIGH LEVEL CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY (CCP) MEMBERS WITHIN THE UN SYSTEM HELPED CREATE THE SDGs AND ARE CURRENTLY HELPING LEAD THE ORGANIZATION'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GLOBAL PLAN.
THE SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVE IS A TOOL TO GAIN CONTROL OVER FOOD, AGRICULTURE AND PEOPLE. THE END GOAL IS TO REDUCE SOVEREIGNTY ON BOTH INDIVIDUAL NATIONS AND PEOPLE AND CENTRALIZE POWER AT THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEVEL.
WE MUST UNDERSTAND THE PRECARIOUS PILLARS OF FARMING COSTS
THE THREE "F"S - FUEL,FERTILIZER AND FINANCE. ALL ARE PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES OF CURRENT FARMING / RANCHING BUSINESS MODELS,
IF LEFT UNCHECKED, THE US BACKED SUSTAINABILITY POLICIES ON AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PRODUCTION WILL LEAD TO:
ECONOMIC DEVASTATION,
SHORTAGES OF CRITICAL GOODS,
WIDESPREAD FAMINE,
DRAMATIC LOSS IF INDIVIDUAL FREEDOMS.
FERTILIZER IS THE KEY TO FARM PRODUCTIVITY & YIELD
SCARCITY AND REGULATIONS ARE KILLING FERTILIZER USAGE WHILE PROMOTING NITROGEN.
NITROGEN IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE.
LAND OWNERSHIP IS A CORE LONG TERM UN SUSTAINABILITY GOAL
THE UN SUSTAINABILITY GOALS AND THE WEF'S "GREAT RESET" TARGETS:
THE CENTRALIZED CONTROL OVER FOOD PRODUCTION,
CRUSH INDEPENDENT FARMERS AND RANCHERS,
GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP OF ALL LAND.

OUR DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM AND STANDARD OF LIVING IS AT STAKE!

=========

THE PROBLEM IS AN ORCHESTRATED REGULATORY ATTACK ON GLOBAL FOOD PRODUCERS

THE UN / WEF SUSTAINABILITY PLAN FOR FOOD

I have written extensively over the last couple of years about coordinated plans underway around the world under the theme of "Sustainability". The prime movers of this global initiative is the UN and the WEF.

The one area I have not previously discussed in this context has been Food. Instead I have limited my discussions on food to growing shortages and emerging problems such as Fertilizer. We need to explore this further to understand Phase III of the Commodity Super-Cycle.

THE UN / WEF LEAD SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVE IS A TOOL TO GAIN CONTROL OVER FOOD, AGRICULTURE AND PEOPLE.

THE END GOAL IS TO REDUCE SOVEREIGNTY ON BOTH INDIVIDUAL NATIONS AND PEOPLE AND CENTRALIZE POWER AT THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEVEL.

A recent article by the independent Epoch Times reports lays out pretty clearly what is going on without much public awareness.

UNITED NATIONS: Sustainable Development Goals—Agenda 2030

The U.N. Sustainable Development Goals, often referred to as Agenda 2030, were adopted in 2015 by the organization and its member states as a guide to “transforming our world.” Hailed as a “master plan for humanity” and a global “declaration of interdependence” by top U.N. officials, the 17 goals include 169 targets involving every facet of the economy and life.

“All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan,” declares the preamble to the document, repeatedly noting that “no one will be left behind.”

Among other elements, the U.N. plan calls for national and international wealth redistribution in Goal 10, as well as “fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services.”

Using government to transform all economic activity is a critical part of the SDGs, with Goal 12 demanding “sustainable consumption and production patterns.”

Among the specific targets outlined in Goal 12 are several directly linked to agricultural policies that undermine food production. These include “sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.”

Perhaps more importantly, the document demands “environmentally sound management of chemicals and all wastes throughout their life cycle, in accordance with agreed international frameworks.”

As a result, people and especially farmers must “significantly reduce their release to air, water, and soil in order to minimize their adverse impacts on human health and the environment.”

Other SDGs that are directly tied to what critics have called the “war on farmers” include Goal 14, which addresses “marine pollution of all kinds, in particular from land-based activities, including … nutrient pollution.” The U.N. regularly describes agriculture and food production as a threat to the ocean.

The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), led by former CCP Vice Minister of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Qu Dongyu, is helping to lead the charge.

In its 2014 report “Building a Common Vision for Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Principles and Approaches,” the U.N. agency calls for drastic restrictions on the use of fertilizers, pesticides, emissions, and water in the agricultural sector.

As an example of how agriculture must be reformed to be considered sustainable by the U.N., the FAO report declares that “excessive use of nitrogen fertilizer is a major cause of water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.” The Rome-based FAO didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Another of the 17 SDGs with a direct impact on agriculture and food production is Goal 2, with its calls for “sustainable agriculture” and “sustainable food production.”

Goal 6, meanwhile, calls for “sustainable management of water,” which includes various targets involving agricultural water use and runoff.

Because U.N. leaders see agriculture and food production as key contributors to what they call man made climate change, Goal 13 is important, too. It calls for governments to “integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning.”

Goal 15, which deals with sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, also has multiple targets that affect agriculture and food production.

All over the world, national and regional governments are working with U.N. agencies to implement these sustainability goals in agriculture and other sectors.

For instance, responding to U.N. biodiversity agreements, the European Union has enacted various U.N.-backed biodiversity programs such as Natura 2000 and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, which have been cited by the Dutch government and others in their agricultural policies.

The U.N. also boasts publicly about its role in imposing the SDGs in Sri Lanka and other nations suffering from food shortages and economic calamities linked to the very same global sustainability programs.

Around the world, almost every national government says it’s incorporating the SDGs into its own laws and regulations.

World Economic Forum ‘Partnership’

Alongside the U.N. are various “stakeholders” that are critical to implementing sustainable development policies through “public-private partnerships.”

At the heart of that effort is the WEF, which since 2020 has been pushing a total transformation of society known as the “Great Reset.” In 2019, the WEF signed a “strategic partnership” with the U.N. to advance Agenda 2030 within the global business community.

The official agreement defined “areas of cooperation to deepen institutional engagement and jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”

Many of the key officials behind Agenda 2030, including top U.N. leaders such as current Secretary-General António Guterres—a self-proclaimed socialist—have also been working with the WEF for decades.

Meanwhile, the WEF has been explicit with its goals. It recently launched a “Food Action Alliance” (FAA) that acknowledges on its website that Agenda 2030 “informs the ambition of the FAA to provide an enduring and long-term platform for multi-stakeholder action on food systems to meet the SDGs.”

Alongside the U.N.’s “Food Systems Summit” in September 2021, the WEF’s FAA released a report outlining its own “leadership agenda for multi-stakeholder collaboration to transform food systems.”

Among other elements, the document summarizes the FAA’s insights on “supporting transformative food system partnerships, and its value proposition beyond the UN Food Systems Summit 2021 towards achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals.”

The WEF’s public concern with transforming agriculture and the food supply goes back over a decade, at least.

In partnership with various companies, the WEF released a 2010 report outlining a “new vision for agriculture” that included a “roadmap for stakeholders.” Many of the world’s largest food companies that dominate the market and own countless popular brands are involved.

The WEF’s website is packed with information purporting to justify a total transformation of the food supply by “stakeholders.”

“As global food systems become increasingly interconnected, effective coordination among a diverse set of stakeholders will be required,” WEF says on its “Strategic Intelligence” platform, frequently citing the FAO as its source.

“The potential to craft new, systemic approaches to food systems that include a diverse array of stakeholders presents opportunities to help sustainably feed the world well into the future.”

The organization’s frequent references to “stakeholders” refers to governments, companies, and so-called nongovernmental organizations that are often funded by those same companies and governments. They are all working together on the issue.

For instance, the WEF boasts that it has brought corporate giants such as Coca-Cola and Unilever into the fold toward promoting a “more sustainable future.”

The Rockefeller Foundation, which recently released a report on how to “Reset the Table” and “Transform the U.S. Food System,” is also a key player.

The WEF’s “Food Innovation Hubs” around the world are set to be a major part of this global transformation.

Speaking to the World Economic Forum on “transforming food systems and land use” at last year’s Davos Agenda Week, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte announced that the Netherlands would host the “Global Coordinating Secretariat of the World Economic Food Innovation Hubs.”

The secretariat, he said, “will connect all other Food Innovation Hubs” in order to facilitate creating “the partnerships we need.”

Neither the WEF nor the Rockefeller Foundation responded to requests for comment on their role in Agenda 2030 and on the agricultural policies being pursued around the world.

Other organizations and entities involved in the push include powerful tax-exempt foundations such as the Gates Foundation, the EU-style regional governments proliferating around the world, and various groups funded by them.es like "for a limited time only" or "only 7 remaining!"

WE MUST UNDERSTAND THE PRECARIOUS PILLARS OF FARMING COSTS

THE THREE "F"S - FUEL,FERTILIZER AND FINANCE ARE ALL PUSHING THE SOLVENCY BOUNDARIES OF CURRENT FARMING / RANCHING BUSINESS MODELS.
Fertilizer, Pesticide & Fuel costs for Wheat (Hard Red Spring) approximate 66.5% of the operating costs per acre. (These were before recent surges in diesel & fertilizer costs).
Finance costs approximate 8.1% per acre.
The Three "F"S approximate 74.6% per cultivated acre.

GOVERNMENT REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS ON FERTILIZER EMISSIONS
Governments are now significantly restricting Fertilizer usage which has an even larger impact than the cost increases in fertilizers, etc., since farmers would not add these costs if they didn't return more than they cost. The 62 yield per acre for our Hard Red Spring Wheat example will be be slashed dramatically.
Canadian and Netherlands farmers are strenuously objecting as they say it will bankrupt them. Farmers, ranchers and even two Canadian provincial governments say the impacts could be catastrophic.

FERTILIZER IS THE KEY TO FARM PRODUCTIVITY & YIELD
IF LEFT UNCHECKED, THE US BACKED SUSTAINABILITY POLICIES ON AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PRODUCTION WILL LEAD TO:

ECONOMIC DEVASTATION,
SHORTAGES OF CRITICAL GOODS,
WIDESPREAD FAMINE,
DRAMATIC LOSS OF INDIVIDUAL FREEDOMS.

LAND OWNERSHIP IS A CORE LONG TERM STRATEGIC US GOAL

THE UN SUSTAINABILITY GOALS AND THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM'S (WEF'S) "GREAT RESET" TARGETS:
THE CENTRALIZED CONTROL OVER FOOD PRODUCTION,
THE CRUSHING OF INDEPENDENT FARMERS AND RANCHERS,
GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP OF ALL LAND.

As explained by the UN on its SDG website, the goals adopted in 2015 “build on decades of work by countries and the UN”:

One of the earliest meetings defining the “sustainability” agenda was the UN Conference on Human Settlements known as Habitat I, which adopted the Vancouver Declaration.
The agreement stated that “land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals” and that private land ownership is “a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice.”
“Public control of land use is therefore indispensable,” the UN declaration said, a prelude to the World Economic Forum’s now infamous “prediction” that by 2030, “you’ll own nothing.”
Numerous UN agencies and officials have outlined their vision of “sustainability” since then, including calls for drastic restrictions on energy, meat consumption, travel, living space and material prosperity.
Experts interviewed by The Epoch Times say that some of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful corporate leaders are working with communists in China and elsewhere in an effort to centralize control over food production and crush independent farmers and rancher.

Squeezing Farmers—and the Food Supply

All over the globe, U.N. SDG-aligned government policies are squeezing farmers—especially smaller, independent producers unable to absorb the added costs of added regulation and control.

Celebrating U.N. sustainability ideas, recently ousted Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa announced at the U.N. COP26 climate summit in 2021 that his government was banning chemical fertilizers and pesticides

“Sri Lanka recently restricted the imports of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and weedicides due to public health concerns, water contamination, soil degradation, and biodiversity impacts,” Rajapaksa told world leaders, to widespread acclaim.

“Although opposed by entrenched lobbies, this has created opportunities for innovation and investment into organic agriculture that will be healthier and more sustainable in future.”

In reality, even though they were promptly rolled back, the policies produced catastrophic food shortages, widespread hunger, and eventually a popular revolt that ousted the president and his government.

In 2019, the socialist Sri Lankan government also partnered with the U.N. Environment Programme to establish the U.N. Global Nitrogen Campaign, which promotes the U.N.-backed policies on nitrogen that are now proliferating worldwide.

In the Netherlands, headquarters for the WEF’s “Food Innovation Hub” secretariat, authorities are imposing nitrogen policies that are expected to decimate the nation’s highly productive agricultural sector. The plans also include widespread expropriation of farms.

“The expropriation plans of the cabinet are a downright declaration of war on the agricultural sector,” said Dutch Member of Parliament Gideon van Meijeren, of the Forum for Democracy party, as cited by De Dagelijkse Standaard. “Under false pretenses, farmers are being robbed of their land, centuries-old farms are being demolished and farmers’ families are being totally destroyed.”

Experts warned of dangerous consequences stemming from such sustainability policies including food shortages, skyrocketing prices, social unrest, and more.

“You can glimpse the green, sustainable future by beholding Holland and Sri Lanka now,” Bonner Cohen, a senior fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research, told The Epoch Times.

And yet, the agenda is spreading rapidly. Canadian federal authorities last week announced similar restrictions on fertilizers and nitrogen after restrictions on energy production were put in place, sparking outrage from provincial officials and farmers.

In Ireland, the United Kingdom, and other European nations, various government entities are also working to slash agricultural production under sustainability programs.

Meanwhile, aside from continuing with policies that pay farmers not to grow food, the Biden administration is seeking to impose WEF-backed “Environmental, Social, Governance” metrics and reporting on companies through the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Farm associations and more than 100 members of Congress argue that the plan would bankrupt owners of small and medium-size farms unable to comply with climate reporting requirements to do business with public firms, even as the world moves toward widespread food shortages.

In part, experts say the insistence on these sorts of policies is because those imposing them are largely insulated from the damage they are causing.

“Global elites in government, transnational organizations, corporate boardrooms—well represented in the WEF—are so caught up in their climate virtue signaling, from which many hope to benefit financially through investments in green energy, that they are slow to notice that they are completely detached from reality,” said National Center for Public Policy Research’s Cohen, who specializes in environmental issues.

“Few of those imposing regulations on farmers have ever set foot on a farm. By virtue of the power and wealth these people already have, they are shielded from the consequences of the misguided policies they impose on the rest of the world. That burden is borne by ordinary people around the world, about whom the Davos crowd and their partners in crime know nothing.”

Small, Independent Farms at Risk: Experts

Sri Lanka’s disaster offers a preview of what will happen to the United States and Europe if policymakers continue to follow the U.N. sustainability agenda, according to Sterling Burnett, who holds a doctorate in environmental ethics and leads the nonprofit Heartland Institute’s Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy.

“It’s not a war on farming; it’s a war on small farming and independent farmers,” he told The Epoch Times. “It’s a war in support of elite, large-scale agricultural industries.”

Even though the U.N. SDGs speak of helping “small-scale food producers,” Burnett argued that independent farms and ranches are in the U.N.’s crosshairs to help consolidate control over the food supply.

Policymakers are “in the pocket” of major corporate interests including Conagra, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, and others, he said.

“They would just as soon have all their small competitors put out of business,” he said, echoing concerns expressed by numerous other experts.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, whose firm manages more money than any other company in the world, “wants to impose his values on companies using other people’s money,” Burnett said.

Fink, who serves on the board of the powerful Council on Foreign Relations and works closely with the WEF, is a key architect of the push to impose “environmental, social, governance” metrics on U.S. companies.

“This is the super-rich foisting their values on the rest of us,” said Burnett, pointing to those he says are happy to work with communists on the effort.

“As far as the World Economic Forum is concerned, you can’t have a Great Reset if you don’t reset the food supply, because food is necessary to everybody,” he said. “Stalin recognized this: Whoever controls the food controls the people. Same with energy.”

As prices soar and farmers go bankrupt, major corporations, in league with governments and international organizations, will pick up the pieces.

In the meantime, as seen recently in Sri Lanka, hungry people pushed to the brink are likely to react.

“People were not starving on January 6,” said Burnett, referring to the Jan. 6, 2021, protest and breach at the U.S. Capitol. “The supply chain crisis is happening, shelves are already going empty, and when people are hungry, they will not sit around and do nothing.”

American Policy Center founder and President Tom DeWeese, a leading expert on and critic of U.N. notions of sustainability, warned that the war on farmers was part of a broader agenda to strip people of freedom.

“Always in the past, when tyrannical forces wanted to rule the world, they built armies and invaded, broke things, killed people, and forced subjugation,” DeWeese told The Epoch Times. “We are now dealing with a diabolical force that has figured out a way to get us to voluntarily surrender our liberties and help them subjugate us.

“What could be such a powerful tool? The threat of Environmental Armageddon,” he said, pointing to the climate-change narrative as the prime example.

Citing numerous U.N. officials and documents, DeWeese says the agenda isn’t to save the climate, but to transform the planet and centralize control over the populace.

Aside from the U.N. and the WEF, major companies such as Vanguard and BlackRock are working to take over and control the food supply, he said.

Already, a handful of companies in which those two investment firms are top shareholders dominate the global food and beverage industry. By taking over the farming, they will control it all.

“The goal is to have total control over food production,” he said, noting that they seek to own all seeds and even grow synthetic meat in facilities already being backed financially by Bill Gates and other billionaires.

Genetically engineered crops are high on the agenda, too.

The U.N., the WEF, and others are also moving forward with promoting insects and weeds as food. Across the Western world, insect protein production facilities are popping up rapidly.

But it gets even darker, DeWeese says.

“If people are starving, they are much easier to subjugate,” he said, adding that depopulation and control over humanity have been on the agenda of global elites for decades.

The “war on farmers” also comes amid what critics have described as a government-backed “war on energy” that’s affecting agriculture and virtually every other sector.

This includes limiting energy exploration, shutting down power plants, charging special fees and taxes, and other policies that have resulted in rapidly rising costs across the Western world, although not in places such as China.

The experts interviewed by The Epoch Times urged Americans to resist the war on farmers and the U.N.-backed sustainability policies using a variety of means. These include getting involved politically, adopting different shopping habits, finding alternative sources of food such as local farmers, and other measures.

Officials at the U.N. didn’t respond to requests for comment."

278 million people in Africa suffer from chronic hunger. As Statista details, this corresponds to 20 percent of the continent's population. By comparison, ten percent are affected when looked at globally. The situation is particularly dire in Somalia, with seven other countries rated as "very serious" - Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan, Burundi, the Central African Republic the Comoros and Madagascar.

Projections are that nearly 670 million people will still be facing hunger in 2030 – 8 percent of the world population. Almost 3.1 billion people could not afford a healthy diet in 2020. This is 112 million more than in 2019, reflecting the inflation in consumer food prices stemming from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures put in place to contain it.

The recent setbacks indicate that policies are no longer delivering increasing marginal returns in reducing hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition in all its forms. Governments where the economy is fragile are also facing fiscal constraints to transform agrifood systems. This is the time for governments to start examining their current support to food and agriculture.

Food & Agriculture Organization of the UN

SRI LANKA'S ORGANIC FARMING DISASTER

A shift to better farming practices is possible, but Sri Lanka’s abrupt switch to organics offers a bitter lesson in how to change food systems in a sustainable way.

Sri Lanka's Food Crisis Is Man-Made—and Demonstrates the Danger of Faux Environmentalism | Jackson Paul

CENTRAL AMERICA & PANAMA FOOD CRISIS

Beset by constantly rising prices of basic grains in international markets and accelerating inflation due to daily oil price increases, Central America has turned the spotlight onto a food alert which in the short run threatens to cause severe shortages of agricultural products. With inflation in the region running at an average of six per cent in 2007, Central America is short of wheat, corn, rice, beans, vegetables, fruits, and livestock in the local diet, and must increase grain production.

THE CURRENT G7 RENEWABLE ENERGY DEBACLE WILL USHER IN PHASE II OF THE GLOBAL INFLATION SPIKE

THE COMING THREE PHASES OF THE INFLATION & COMMODITY SUPER-CYCLE

We are expecting Phase II of the Commodity Super-Cycle to begin in 2023. We know the evolution will not be as schematically shown below, BUT it is a good starting point to develop a more detailed unfolding road-map. (We discussed this three phased road-map in this month's UnderTheLens video: "The Geo-Politics of the Commodity Super-Cycle").

CONCLUSION

OUR DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM AND STANDARD OF LIVING IS AT STAKE!

In this newsletter we discussed Food with an unprecedented Food Crisis being part of Phase III. In the previous newsletter we reviewed Energy with an Extraction & Refining Crisis centering Phase II of the unfolding three phase rise in inflation.

Do not forget for one that these policy blunders must be overlaid on spending and tax bills that the US has never experienced before:

The American Rescue Plan: $1.9 Trillion
The Infrastructure & Investment & Jobs Act: $1.2T
The "CHIPS" Bill: $255 Billion
The Inflation Reduction Act: ~$455 Billion
The Veterans Benefits Bill: ~$300 Billion

TOTAL: ~ $.4.2 Trillion and over $500 Billion in new taxes

THIS IS NOT ALL POLITICAL STUPIDITY! IT IS CALLED THE "GREAT RESET" & IS STRATEGICALLY PLANNED!

Money Printing Is Coming Home to Roost!

In the 15 years of this chart, there are three crises: The Financial Crisis, the Pandemic and now Raging Inflation. Today’s inflation crisis pulls into the opposite direction of the prior two crises, and dealing with it will require the application of the tools in the opposite direction

Never forget that what is going on is a strategical required re-balancing of Global Standard of Livings.

As Brandon Smith at ALT-America.com concludes::

The “Great Reset” agenda of the UN, WEF, IMF, the BIS and other globalist organizations requires an extensive destabilization of the existing order. In other words, they need a controlled demolition of certain pillars of the economy. To frighten the public into accepting new collectivist and authoritarian models like the “Shared Economy” (where you will own nothing and like it), they will need a large and semi-chaotic disaster. People would have to be threatened with the loss of supply certainty and they would have to be unsure every day of where they will be able to get the necessities they need when they need them.

This level of uncertainty drives calls for solutions, and the globalists will be there to offer their pre-planned objectives and “save the day.”

Generally, inflation and shortages lead to price controls, government rationing, government “aid” with strings attached (Universal Basic Income), and eventually nationalization of all production as well as the attempted confiscation of supplies from people that prepared ahead of time. Redistribution will be the name of the game. Maybe not this year, maybe not next year, but soon enough.

Stagflation and supply chain shortages are going to become the all encompassing issues of our era. They will be terms that are spoken about daily at every dinner table in America and probably through most of the world. These are dangers that were predicted extensively by the liberty media well ahead of time. They are NOT a surprise. And, there are plenty of institutions, corporate and government, that could have done something about them, but they chose not to. It’s important for people to accept the fact that this crisis is not a product of stupidity; it is a product of malicious motives and intent.

We will talk more about this in our next newsletter when we outline how Food will play into the Commodity Super-Cycle and the "Great Reset"!

MATASII'S EXPECTED LONGER TERM S&P 500 OUTLOOK

EXPECTED RESULT

LONG-TERM CORRECTION IN HOUSEHOLD NET WORTH TO DISPOSABLE PERSONAL INCOME

CURRENT MARKET PERSPECTIVE

THE WORST IS STILL IN FRONT OF US,

EXPECT A SHORT TERM BEAR MARKET COUNTER RALLY,

FADE THE UNFOLDING COUNTER RALLY - SELL THE RIPS.

SOFT COMMODITIES ( FOOD & AGRICULTURAL FOOD STUFF) IS COMPLETING PHASE I OF AN EXPECTED THREE PHASE COMMODITY SUPER-CYCLE

YOUR DESK TOP / TABLET / PHONE ANNOTATED CHART

Macro Analytics Chart: SUBSCRIBER LINK

NOTE: Any Problems with this Chart: E-Mail lcmgroupe2@comcast.net

NOTICE Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. MATASII.com does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility.