The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program — an important source of funding for innovation in the life sciences — is currently expected to be reauthorized in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This is anticipated to take place in late fall or early winter, which is several weeks after the program’s September 30 deadline. While it is expected to ultimately be reauthorized, several proposed reforms to the program would render it significantly less capable of amplifying innovation in the life sciences.
The Department of Defense (DoD), which administers nearly half of the entire SBIR budget, is expected to suspend the program until reauthorization. However, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has suggested that its institutes will sustain SBIR under the assumption that it will ultimately be reauthorized later this year. SBIR may still be reauthorized prior to September 30, contingent upon deliberations in Congress.
Since 1990, entities in New Jersey have received over $426 million in SBIR funds through the NIH alone. These entities have been in every Congressional district throughout the State, and SBIR funding has resulted in:
- Nearly 200 patents
- 41 clinical trials
- Nearly 700 scientific publications
To date this year, New Jersey has received approximately $11 million thus far and is among the states that receive the highest amounts of funding annually.
Some of the motivations to reform SBIR are based on concerns that it can be abused by entities to receive excessive numbers of SBIR grants. One proposal to reform the program would limit eligibility based on the total number of awards received since the inception of the program. Another proposal would limit eligibility according to the number of awards an entity receives over a five-year period. Finally, another proposal would restrict eligibility based on more stringent commercialization benchmarks.
These modifications would be particularly problematic to innovation in the life sciences due to the amount of time and resources that R&D in the field demands.
Another motivation for the proposed reforms is that SBIR awards may be creating national security vulnerabilities due to the involvement of foreign entities in the work of some awardees. R&D in the life sciences benefits tremendously from international collaboration, and preventing entities who leverage this strength from receiving support through SBIR would severely inhibit innovation that produces life-saving treatments.
Accordingly, BioNJ will be engaging policymakers to convey not only the importance of reauthorization, but also the damaging effects that these proposed reforms would have on biomedical innovation.
On September 13th, CSBA, BIO, and Advamed will be co-hosting a special briefing on the importance of SBIR. To register, click here.
|