~ November 2022 ~

The NEW clinical 

summaries bookmarks.

In our continued effort to help easily identify important medical records, we have added a “Clinical Summaries” bookmark in NGV. This new category captures these 3 types of documents:

Consultative reports – records containing consult reports that outline chief complaints (ex: SF 600)

Hospitalizations – records containing discharge information, emergency dept encounters and post-op release information

Operative reports – records containing anything with surgeries/procedures both pre and post

'Other' Medical Records



For the Evidence Review section, all medical records are received as a VA e-Folder. The last checkbox for Other should only be used when records were outside of what was provided by QTC/VA e-Folder. This includes records brought in by claimant that were not already part of the e-Folder. 

How to locate tabbed records using the Document I.D.

We have been working diligently to provide examiners an easier way to identify TABBED records. The VA is working to implement a policy that provides a corresponding Document ID for each referenced TABBED record in the case assignment sheet.

 

To locate these TABBED records by their corresponding Document ID, you need to

 

1) Expand the Documents bookmark


2) Click on CTRL+F (Cmd+F on Mac)


3) Enter Document ID (recommend to copy and paste from MEP under Instructions to Provider)

RESOURCES

Click on the links below to access:


Q-Tips Vol.XX: 

Click HERE for latest volume (10/03/22)  


Job Aids

Overview: Infectious Diseases (Including Covid 19)


Optional TRAIN Courses:

NEW - MDE | Separation Health Assessment (SHA) DBQ: Military Sexual Trauma (MST) Handout (ID: 1105323)


The Veteran Experience (ID: 1104973)


Correlation vs. Causation in Medical Opinions (ID: 1105223)

How to explain a change in diagnosis

In the Diagnosis section – select "Has changed and it is a..."


  • This will open a sub-section that will allow you to select whether there is a progression, a new and separate diagnosis, or other.
  • In the rationale text box, provide an explanation as to why the diagnosis was changed. CLEARLY state if the VA established diagnosis remains or is being replaced by the change and explain the reason for the change.
  • If the change is due to a correction of a prior erroneous diagnosis, the explanation must be supported by the clinical evidence of record that refutes the previous exam(s) which diagnosed the condition.
  • Review the non-editable grey boxes below your rationale to validate your response. Edits can only be made in the diagnosis section.

Example 1

VA established of Left Knee Strain with a newly rendered diagnosis of Degenerative Joint Disease with Instability

Progression: For the VA established diagnosis of left knee strain, the diagnosis is changed and it is a progression. Current x-rays show degenerative changes in the knee. Additionally, there was lateral instability on exam. This represents a progression of the prior condition.

Example 2

VA established diagnosis of Right Foot Plantar Fasciitis with a newly rendered diagnosis of Right Foot Plantar Fasciitis and Morton's Neuroma

New and separate diagnosis: For the VA established diagnosis of right foot plantar fasciitis, the diagnosis is changed and it is a new and separate diagnosis. Neuroma formation is an anatomical condition where the metatarsal heads are too close together or are forced into a position that entrap the nerve. Plantar fasciitis is a soft tissue condition where the ligament that connects the heel and metatarsal heads get stressed/stretched. The two are unrelated and separate. The plantar fasciitis is unchanged and is currently active based on exam.

Example 3

VA established diagnosis of Right Leg Injury, Other with a newly rendered diagnosis of S/P Fasciotomy with Scar Secondary to Compartment Syndrome

Other: For the VA established diagnosis of right leg injury, other, the diagnosis is changed and it is an update of prior diagnosis. Claimant had fasciotomy at the time of the leg injury and the change to diagnosis is an update since the surgery occurred immediately after injury, and therefore not a progression.


The Pact Act



The bill known as the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act was signed into law by President Biden on 8/10/2022. This action will dramatically expand the benefits and services for veterans with toxic exposures and veterans of the Vietnam, Gulf War and post-9/11 eras who may develop injuries and illnesses that take years to manifest themselves. Those realities often made it difficult for veterans to establish a connection between their service and disabilities, preventing them from getting the care they needed. 

 

The Impact to QTC Examiners:

  • Dramatic increase in toxic exposure claims due to the expansion of eligibility requirements for Gulf War and post 9/11 Veterans. This increase is anticipated in Focused exams to evaluate for current disability level.
  • Adds more than 20 new presumptive conditions for burn pits and other toxic exposures.
  • Adds more presumptive-exposure locations for Agent Orange and radiation
  • VA adjudicators cannot make any PACT Act related rating decisions until January 2023. However, you may start to see some PACT Act related claims which VA will hold for adjudication until Congress has made funding available.

In Preparation:

 

Completion of the new VA required course, VA MDE Course, Assessing Deployment Related Environmental Exposures, has been required for ALL C&P Examiners to be knowledgeable about the basic principles of deployment related environmental exposure with a focus on using risk communication as a tool to improve education, information sharing, patient/provider satisfaction and foster behavior change that is most consistent with improving the health of Veterans with exposure concerns. See VA VBA MDE TRAIN Course 1101919 if you haven’t yet completed this course.


QTC will provide more information and additional guidance as received by the VA.

Learn more:

 

Gulf War Exposures - Public Health (va.gov)

 Environmental Exposures Basics

Have additional questions? 


Email us here:

PACT Act Questions

ACE VS In-Person

Based on a recent review of the quality errors, it was noted that a large percent of errors were due to the following:

  • Both in-person and ACE were selected;
  • Inconsistent selection between the Primary or Exam DBQ (i.e., In-Person) and the associated Medical Opinion DBQ (i.e., ACE); or
  • No selection was made on the DBQ

 Important reminder: An exam cannot be both In-Person and ACE. Effective immediately, QAs have been authorized to correct this type of error on report and return to examiners for review/approval and a new signature.

Logo.png