Tacoma City Council
RHAWA Member Turnout is Crucial for Landlord voices to be heard in Tacoma City Council meetings

Tacoma's Community Vitality and Safety Committee is set to hear a proposal from city staff which seeks to enact a Just Cause "Eviction" Ordinance in the city of Tacoma.

Meeting Information
Date - Thursday, August 9, 2018
Time - 4:30 pm
Place - Tacoma Municipal Bldg, Room 248

Tacoma City Council appears headed down the same road as Seattle in its effort to make operating rental property as difficult as possible for independent rental housing owners. Tenant advocates have the attention of Council and Tacoma landlords must make their voices heard to let them know that these laws won't help renters, and will restrict your ability to work with renters to find fair compromise when issues arise during tenancy.

Other requirements drafted by City staff for tenant protections include:
  • 60-day notice requirement for rent increases
  • 60-day notice requirements for termination of tenancy
  • Relocation assistance ordinance which requires owners to host in-person meetings with tenants
  • Move-In Fee Installment Payments
  • Requirement that owners inform tenants of any code violations at the property within the past 12 months - even if caused by the tenant
  • Requirement that owners provide an "information for tenants" packet to renters
Tacoma City Council needs to hear your voices and understand that RHAWA members are part of the community, care about tenants, and are not predatory landlords. Tell them about the tenants you’ve helped and the value your rental offers the city. Councilmembers know that RHAWA members are the solution, not the problem, and that the demands of tenant advocates are going to hurt small, independent landlords who provide the most affordable and accessible housing in Tacoma.
Dear Councilmember,

My name is ____ and I'm contacting you today as an independent landlord operating in Tacoma to ask that you consider the perspective of landlords and the unintended consequences brought about by a policy such as Seattle's Just Cause Eviction Ordinance. It is disheartening to hear landlord input has been ignored while tenant protections proposals have been drafted, even as landlords have offered a fair compromise on many of the rental housing issues facing Tacoma.

There is zero data to suggest that a Just Cause Eviction Ordinance will protect Tacoma renters. We do have data, however, which states plainly that landlords react to this type of legislation by making it harder for applicants to qualify to ensure a tenancy is low-risk, and by raising rents to ensure that adequate financial resources are in place should problems occur during a tenancy (https://www.rhawa.org/blog/uw-rental-housing-study-supports-what-landlords-have-been-telling-city-officials-for-years).

A new UW Rental Housing study [1] commissioned by the City of Seattle surveyed over 4,200 private housing providers and in many ways, the research findings corroborate what the private market has been informing the Council of for years:

  1. 22% of landlords reported that they increased rent, at least in part, in response to new city ordinances.
  2. About 40% of the landlords responding to the survey reported that they have already adopted stricter rental requirements in response to the City’s recent ordinances, and another 24% report that they plan to adopt stricter standards in the future.
  3. More than half of the survey respondents report that the ordinance to limit move-in fees will be ineffective or very ineffective. Only 19% believe that it is effective or very effective.
  4. 80% reported that higher property taxes were at least one of the reasons they raised rents. Increased costs of repairs were reported as an important factor for about 40% of those landlords raising rents in the past year.
  5. Landlord perspective is not considered by City officials (89% of survey respondents)
  6. Recent rent increases tended to be more common, and larger, among landlords managing large- (20+ unit) and moderate-sized buildings than among landlords managing smaller buildings.
  7. About 40% of landlords have sold, or plan to sell, property in response City ordinances governing the housing market, with long-term landlords, and those managing large numbers of buildings (Appendix B, Figure 341) especially likely to report that they plan to sell.
[1] file:///K:/Government%20Affairs/UW%20Seattle%20Rental%20Housing%20Study/UW%20Seattle%20Rental%20Housing%20Study%20Report.pdf

Seattle's "tenant protection" ordinances have not created one unit of affordable housing, nor have they incentivized owners to preserve their rentals at more affordable rates and to work with renters who have difficulty qualifying for a unit due to bad credit, poor references, or an evictions history. Why is Tacoma Council now considering going down this same path?

A Just Cause Ordinance is the wrong approach for Tacoma for many reasons, including:
  • Landlords do not terminate tenancies for no reason. It is a falsehood lacking data to suggest that landlords terminate tenancies with 20 days' notice for no reason. The risk of lost rental income, the hassle of turning a unit, and the time involved in the process are a huge disincentive to ending a tenancy unless there are issues with the tenant that cannot be resolved through negotiation.
  • Under current law, I can work with my tenant to negotiate issues of concern and give them a chance to comply with rules. Under Just Cause landlords are incentivized to issue formal 3-day and 10-day notices to comply due to the need to establish a paper trail to keep options open, which can result in bad landlord references and/or evictions filings against tenants which otherwise would not have occurred.
  • Landlords will refuse to allow tenants to have month-to-month agreements in Tacoma to avoid the hassles of Just Cause. This harms renters who otherwise would enjoy the flexibility that a month-to-month contract offers, such as the need to move when taking a new job or starting a family.
  • Just Cause protects problem tenants at the expense of others living next door who are good neighbors. The process of achieving "just cause" to terminate a tenancy affords problem tenants months' worth of compliance notices before they can be required to move, all the while good renters and neighbors are forced to suffer living next to someone who may be harassing, intimidating, or disrupting their lives.

A Just Cause Ordinance is not the right path for Tacoma. We've seen Seattle's landlord regulations fail in the real world and in court. I'm asking you today to vote no on Just Cause, and to commit to supporting working with landlords in Tacoma who are the people providing the most affordable housing we have in our city.

Thank you,