RISE ROSE 3/4's - & It's NOT OVER YET!


PUBLISHED BY TEANECK VOICES

Contents View this issue in your browser/Teaneck Voices Listens

RISE ROSE 3/4'S - & it's Not over Yet!

Wait for the Data, Mr. Mayor

Election Night at Regina's: The Giants Whose Shoulders We Stood On

Board of Election Results: Clean Sweep

This Week in Teaneck - 11/13-20. 2022


Announcements


  • Contacting Teaneck Voices

RISE ROSE 3/4's - & It's NOT OVER YET!

Congratulations to the RISE for Teaneck challenger slate of 4 candidates which can provisionally be assured of having won three of the four open seats in the Town’s seven-member Council. That means that candidates Belcher, Gee, Goldberg and Young will have performed exceedingly well, as Teaneck Voices had hoped and believed they would. 


The RISE slate will have been successful while expending campaign funds less than half of what will prove to have been spent by the slate led by 24-year incumbent Elie Y. Katz. Only the results for Katz were strong enough to put him in a position to be potentially elected – as each of the other 4 candidates were more than 1400 votes off the pace. (see image below)


However, it remains much too early in the vote counting process to make definitive statements about the results of the November 2022 election for 4 members of Teaneck Council. That is true for two reasons:


1)   The available vote totals among the top five candidates are relatively close. Only 129 votes separate the top 3rd, 4th and 5th place candidates – in an election where more than 14,400 Teaneck voters participated; and


2) The number of votes which will ultimately be certified by the County is unknown because 3 categories of votes remain to be added to the already completed vote counting:


a.      An indeterminate number of Vote-By-Mail ballots remain to be counted – indeed until COB on Monday 11/14 the County is required to count Mail-in Ballots which were postmarked bu USPS before 8 pm on election day, 11/8; and


b.    None of the provisional ballots submitted for a variety of reasons on election day can be counted until the County is in a position to know whether voters who submitted those “provisionals” are truly eligible to vote and have not previously submitted ballots in this election; and


c.      Votes of voters whose ballots were rejected for, for example, having signatures that did not match County registration signatures who have been given a chance to “cure” whatever made their first ballot unacceptable. This is a County evaluation process which will apparently begin on Wednesday 11/16 and be completed by 11/18.


However, despite the uncertainties, here in the image below is the best current summary of the results thus far tabulated. Look carefully. The County Clerk has listed the 9 Council candidates in the image below in the order they appeared on the ballot – which is not the order of their election success for which you need to consult the actual numbers in the image. The same data can also be seen if you Click Here. 


Inherently, then, literally no one (not even our current mayor – see related story) is in a position to begin to speculate on whether there will be a new Council majority and how the newly elected Council will govern. Teaneck Voices expects some of those issues to be addressed beginning next week.


What can be said at this point is that the decision (by referendum in 2021) to move the municipal election to November has already resulted in a significant increase in voter participation in Council selection! This year more than 45% of the 31K registered voters voted. We will have gone from registered voter participation in the all mail-in 2020 pandemic year of 31%. In the last “regular” 2018 May election, voter participation was 24%. In other words, Teaneck’s democracy is already stronger as a result of electing its municipal officials in November.


PS: Our readers are advised not yet to count on the Township website to provide accurate post-Council election data. The website (Click Here) currently provides data on 1) what is only about 60% of the results, 2) erroneously lists Deputy Mayor Katz as the leading vote-getter and 3) tells the reader that the names listed in bold are the elected candidates. We surmise that the Town Clerk was using only the data he had collected on election day in the local districts. Only the Bergen County Clerk’s election results will first have the accurate results as they are amended and lead to election certification – perhaps by 11/20.

WAIT FOR THE DATA, MR. MAYOR

Recent Teaneck Mayors have begun to speak/write as though they had some authority independent of the full Council to evaluate and even reach conclusions on a variety of topics. That is not our Faulkner Act Council form of government. The most egregious example of precisely that disrespect is Mayor Dunleavy’s November 11 letter which appeared last Friday on the Township Facebook (Click Here).


Read the letter (image below) carefully. Having acknowledged that the election results are incomplete, Dunleavy then goes on in the next statement – without any evidence whatsoever – to claim that the remainder uncounted votes will not affect the outcome – and then to congratulate Elie Katz on his re-election and opine on how good that will be for the commonweal. Dunleavy’s letter somehow manages not to even hint that if Katz is, in fact, elected again in 2022, he will be the fourth - very last - one in.



It is difficult to fathom why the Mayor thought he could forecast results for which no one has the data. 

ELECTION NIGHT AT REGINA'S :

  The Giants Whose Shoulders We Stood On

By Dr. Barbara Ley Toffler


Tuesday night, November 8, 2022 we all were at the RISE 4 Teaneck party at Regina’s Restaurant, waiting for the results of the first Council election to be held at the general election in November. Our Fabulous Four Candidates -- Denise Belcher, Danielle Gee, Hillary Goldberg, Chondra Young – and their families were there. So were so many people from so many communities in Teaneck!


There, of course, were the four Women candidates. There were people of every color skin imaginable – Black, White, Brown, Ivory, Bronze, Tan and Tawny. There were a variety of head coverings – hijabs, kippahs, baseball caps (Yankees AND Red Sox). And all these colors and coverings were all mixed around the room. Everybody was talking to everybody!!


In between the cheering, the kisses, the hugs, the hi-fives, and the fist bumps, the same words were murmured or shouted around the crowded event: “This is what Teaneck looks like!” “This is the real Teaneck!” “This is us!”


But Regina’s was even more crowded on election night than it appeared. In the hearts and minds of all in the room were the many giants on whose shoulders we all stood – the giants who created the plan and fought for integrated schools and the equally impassioned giants who created the Teaneck Fair Housing Committee.


It is impossible to name the many, many courageous heroes of 1953 to 1965, but a few will serve symbolically for ALL.

There were Dr. Archie Lacey, husband and activist partner of Theodora Lacey, June and Mort Handler who with Clarice and BOE Trustee Ted Ley and Town Attorney Jack Schneider started the non-profit Teaneck League for Better Schools in 1953, School Superintendent Dr. Harvey Scribner, BOE members including Lamar Jones, Bernard Confer, George Larson, Dr. Milton Bell, Seymour Herr who voted for integration, Head of The Teaneck Fair Housing Committee (TFHC) Mrs. Myrna Gillespie, and pro bono attorney for TFHC the late NBA Commissioner David Stern.


From the Board of Education election in February, 1953 to the Board of Education and Council elections in November, 2022 – almost 70 years of activism, courage, incredibly hard work came to a well-earned NEXT STEP in Teaneck’s commitment to diversity, inclusion and equity in the model town of Teaneck, NJ.

 

           History of the Desegregation of Teaneck Schools


(Bergen Record, May 11, 2014, 50 years after the historic vote to desegregate Teaneck’s Schools)


           1953 - A budget referendum to expand and build schools to accommodate the township's growing Jewish and African-American population was defeated, with some attributing it to prejudice against Jews and blacks.

           May 27, 1953 - The Teaneck League for Better Schools, a Jewish-led political association, forms to campaign and endorse candidates supporting school expansion, reform and, later, racial integration.

           May 17, 1954 - U.S. Supreme Court rules racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional in Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka, Kan.

           1955-1960 - More African-Americans move to Teaneck, leaving urban areas for the suburban    town because of its reputation for welcoming minorities. However, racial steering by real estate agents creates majority black neighborhoods in northeast Teaneck and segregated neighborhood schools.

           1961 - Newly hired schools Superintendent Harvey Scribner works with residents to integrate the town's schools.

           1962 - African-American residents and school officials propose a volunteer-based busing program, which fails when only 13 black families and one white family sign up.

           1964 - North East Community Organization, an interracial association started by African-American residents in the northeast section of Teaneck, formed to advocate for quality services and schools in the township.

           May 13, 1964 - Teaneck becomes the first town in the nation to voluntarily integrate its schools when the Board of Education votes 7-2 in favor of busing students to a central sixth grade.

           September 1964 - White and black sixth-graders attend class together at the integrated William Bryant School.

           February 9, 1965 - Pro-integration voting bloc elects a school board that affirms districtwide integration.

 

BOARD OF EDUCATION RESULTS: CLEAN SWEEP

For the Teaneck Board of Education election, 5 candidates were to be chosen in 2022.

·       3 among 7 candidates were to be chosen for the normal 3 year Board terms.

·        2 among 5 candidates were to be chosen to complete 1 year terms of Board members who had resigned in the middle of their terms.


There was one slate (Achieving Excellence Together) which proposed candidates for all 5 seats. In fact, as the image below indicates, that slate’s candidates would appear to have each won easily. So clear were the margins of those 5 candidates over their competitors that Teaneck Voices believes its readers can consider that election’s choices to have been resolved. The results found in the image below can also be found on the County Clerk’s website if you Click Here

THIS WEEK IN TEANECK - 11/13-20, 2022

Teaneck Social Services Advisory Board - Monday 1/14 at 11 am


  • Public access and opportunity for input limited by the Advisory Board ordinance (*See ordinance below)


Environmental Commission - Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 7:30pm. For Zoom Access Click Here. Agenda, Not yet available


Board of Education Regular Meeting – Wednesday November 16, 2022 at 8:00 pm.

The meeting will be conducted in a hybrid fashion, both in person (Cheryl Miller-Porter Student Center inside Teaneck High) and virtually via the ZOOM link Click Here  

For the agenda: TO BE POSTED


Senior Citizens Advisory Board (SCAB) Thursday, 11/17, 2022 at 1:30pm.



  • Public access and opportunity for input limited by the Advisory Board ordinance (*See ordinance below)


…………………………….

*Quote from Ordinance 15-2020 on Advisory Boards adopted by Council on August 11, 2020:

 

“Council’s advisory Board meetings are closed to the public. The public can submit items for discussion to the Council’s advisory board chair and council liaison for review and potential for inclusion on their meeting agenda. If the item is placed on the agenda, the chair, with approval of their Council’s advisory board, may invite the member of the public to come and speak to them about the specific issue they want to have discussed”.

 

Contacting Teaneck Voices


By Email: teaneckvoices@gmail.com

By Phone: 201-214-4937

By USPS Mail: Teaneck Voices, PO Box 873. at 1673 Palisade Ave., 07666

Teaneck Voices' Website is www.teaneckvoices.com



Sign Up Now
Send a Comment
Submit an Article
Editorial Policies
LinkedIn Share This Email