Editor’s note: Commissioner Tom Wilson sells real estate at RE/MAX Preferred Choice in Brookville, which is owned by Brian Bauman and Mike Lucas.
Photo of Mr. Wilson as real estate agent on RE/MAX’s website.
BACKGROUND
County Surveyor Rob Seig has been working for over a year to develop standards for drainage, erosion control and street construction to fill a gap in the county’s zoning code for subdivisions and large commercial developments. He started on a six-chapter guide using information from both the state of Indiana, Henry County and the town of Batesville. Mr. Seig intended that having this information would help developers construct new roads to county standards and would enable the county to adopt the roads for future maintenance.
Elkhorn Estates Subdivision in Whitewater Township is one example of a development in which the county would not accept ownership of the roads.
In July 2021, Mr. Seig completed two chapters and the county commissioners voted unanimously to adopt Ordinance 2021-11, which was a 137-page manual that supplemented the county zoning code.
The county’s zoning code has only four pages of text and very little direction about erosion control and drainage. Much is left to the opinions of the county surveyor or the planning commission director. Here is an example from Section 80.08.05(A)(3):
“Measures used to control erosion and reduce sedimentation and to provide drainage shall as a minimum meet the standards and specifications of the Franklin County Surveyor or respective participating Town Board of Trustees and the Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District.”
PASSED AGAIN BY THE COMMISSIONERS
In October 2021, Mr. Seig told the commissioners that D&G Development, LLC. asked him for instructions regarding the rules for lots on Reservoir Hill north of Brookville. According to Mr. Seig, the developer complained to him that they should not be held to the new standards, because the standards were not published on the county’s website. State records show Stephanie Graf as the “governing person” of D&G Development, LLC.
To resolve the complaint, the commissioners rescinded the earlier ordinances for storm water development plans (Chapter 3) and for street construction standards (Chapter 4). Next, they readopted the same ordinances to be effective the same day and to be posted to the website as Ordinance 2021-13.
STANDARDS RESCINDED
Last month, the commissioners voted to rescind the standards written by Mr. Seig and previously adopted by them.
In response, Mr. Seig posted the standards to the surveyor’s page of the county’s website. He referred to his authority in the county’s zoning code.
THE DEBATE
Brian Bauman had several criticisms of the standards written by Mr. Seig and adopted, but later rescinded, by the commissioners. Mr. Bauman said the surveyor’s standards on the county’s website were not valid. He did not want Franklin County using standards adopted by other counties and Batesville. He said that the 2010 zoning code written by the Citizens Input Committee and state of Indiana rules were sufficient. He wanted the zoning code “to be constant” and not changing. He said that the commissioners are in charge of zoning regulations and not the county surveyor. He suggested hiring an engineer to write new standards for the county.
Mr. Seig and Mr. Bauman argued back and forth with points and counter points.
Mr. Bauman said that Mr. Seig “has a passion for drainage” and his standards have “a lot of rules.” Mr. Seig replied there were no amendments made to the original zoning codes since 2010 to protect the public from drainage problems. He agreed to “can the whole thing” and to sit down with interested persons and redo the standards for drainage, erosion and streets.
Mr. Seig asked that the county set a moratorium on new subdivision or commercial permits until new standards were in place. He worried that developers would file for new permits soon and expect their work to be “grandfathered in” and not subject to any county oversight. “It could be catastrophic,” said Mr. Seig.
Mr. Bauman took issue with Mr. Seig’s work as the county surveyor. Mr. Bauman did not want the county surveyor to inspect anything on his properties with one exception - any section corner markers.
Mr. Bauman said that more zoning rules would increase the cost of building and add “more aggravation.” He said, “Take the power away of the surveyor and give it back to the Area Planning Commission and the commissioners.”
Mr. Seig contended that the standards he proposed are meant to protect the health and safety of Franklin County citizens. The rules were not about power, said Mr. Seig.
AUDIENCE’S OPINIONS
Those who spoke in the audience were in favor of tighter rules. County Clerk Neysa Raible asked about adopting Dearborn County’s standards for subdivisions and business properties. Her husband is a builder in Dearborn County and she said, “He knows it is done right.” She continued, “As a county official, I just don’t feel this is right.”
Reservoir Road resident Marty Hacker recounted the plight of a neighbor who has lived nearby for 45 years. She had no drainage problems until a new house was built behind her lot before there were any standards. Her basement flooded twice and she spent an estimated $15,000 for repairs. Mr. Hacker insisted the county “has got to have standards” before developers start building 200 new homes on Reservoir Road near the golf course.
Monica Yane was concerned that developers would “take advantage” during a time period when there were no standards. She said, “Get to work on it so we have a set of standards that guides our county.”
Gus Adams of Laurel spoke in favor of having “some kind of standards”.
Gary Yane of Salt Creek Township asked, “Who wants a change here? A commissioner or a developer?” Brian Bauman replied that he wants “direction” as to whether the surveyor’s standards are legal. He did not want changes made to the zoning code. He did not agree with waiting to build until there are new standards.
Mr. Seig said that he had not changed the zoning code. He followed the zoning code, which says the surveyor sets the standard for drainage.
Mr. Yane commented, “Let's get this straightened out. Why are you arguing?”
Commissioner Wilson said the standards set by the surveyor were not binding or valid unless they were officially made part of the zoning code by the commissioners. He asked Area Planning Commission (APC) board member Daryl Kramer whether the APC could review and complete new standards at their December 14 meeting. Mr. Kramer doubted the APC could complete a review of several chapters of technical standards by that date. He offered to meet every week to try to complete the job. He said, “We will do the best we can.”
Afterwards, people in the room called the meeting “confusing” and “chaotic.”
MOTION TO INVALIDATE
The commissioners passed a motion to invalidate the standards written by the county surveyor until such standards complete a formal review process and are added to the zoning code. The commissioners are the final authority for what is written in the zoning code.
DRAINAGE PROBLEMS
Mr. Bauman asked about drainage problems the county had from new construction since the CIC zoning code was adopted in 2011. There was no answer from the commissioners.
Over the years, the county commissioners have talked about the problems caused by storm water runoff from driveways flooding county roads.
Periodically, residents would petition the commissioners in their role as the drainage board to fix a storm water problem that was allegedly caused by a neighbor. After several years of two neighbors (Don Jones and Jerry Erfman) appearing before the commissioners about a disputed water issue, the commissioners decided to use county resources to fix a drainage problem on Reservoir Road near the golf course entrance.
County residents have also come to the commissioners seeking help when a neighbor made a change to their property and the residents experienced water or mud problems as a result of the change. The commissioners often declined to get involved and said these issues were a civil matter to be handled between neighbors or settled in court.
NEW NUISANCE ORDINANCE TOO
Commissioner’s attorney Grant Reeves asked the commissioners what changes they want to a new nuisance ordinance. Did they want fines, an enforcement officer or action taken through a court? The commissioners came to no decision or took no vote.
Photo Below: Debris burning in an illegal dump on Gobblers Knob that was reported to county and state officials in February 2022. Photo provided.
|