In my view, the response to a repurchase demand is usually a function of the amount in dispute, the status of the relationship of the loan originator with the purchaser or investor making the demand, and the stated grounds for repurchase.
Most defenses arise directly from the terms of the contract governing the purchase and sale of the loan(s) at issue. Even if the contract appears to govern the basis of the repurchase demand, a defense may exist when the contract contains conflicting or ambiguous provisions.
Mortgage loan purchase agreements generally contain provisions that relate to loan-level representation, warranties, and covenants of the seller and the conditions under which the seller must cure, repurchase or substitute a mortgage loan in the event of a breach. ...