- Arts and Humanities
- Education
- Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Sciences
- Health and Life Sciences
- Social Sciences
- Students
- Postdoctoral Fellows
- General
|
|
- The NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education: Education and Human Resources (USE:EHR) Program promotes the development, use, and testing of instructional practices and curricular innovations that engage and improve student learning in STEM disciplines.
- The DOE Office of Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) Program prepares students for STEM careers by providing graduate research opportunities at DOE laboratories.
- Read more of this week's featured opportunities
|
|
Biosafety laboratory inspections
|
|
K-State's Institutional Biosafety Committee, or IBC, in accordance with federal regulations, reviews and approves elements of use of biohazards agents on campus. Biosafety Level 2, or
BSL-2, laboratory inspections are occurring now through December 2017.
Activities that fall under the oversight of the IBC include use of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acids and all activities involving teaching and research with microbiological agents and toxins of biological origin.
Appropriate biosafety practices are critical in minimizing any risk to our researchers, students, and community.
The process by which a laboratory handles, stores, uses, and transports biohazardous materials is a major focus of the IBC.
Laboratory visits are an important way in which the IBC evaluates compliance with BSL-2 containment standards in accordance with the Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 5
th
ed. (BMBL), the
NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines),
and K-State Environmental Health and Safety’s
Prudent Practices in Laboratory Safety
.
What to expect during and after a visit
- BSL-2 Laboratory compliance visits are routine and are scheduled in advance.
- Two members of the IBC will coordinate with your college environmental health and safety contact to schedule and plan the visit, which typically lasts 30 to 60 minutes.
- Before the visit, you will receive the checklist that the IBC uses, plus a list of common findings.
- IBC members will tour the lab space and review the laboratory biosafety manual and training records for your staff. Committee members will ask questions about your standard operating procedures and containment practices to ensure they are consistent with what the IBC has approved.
- When the visit is complete, you will receive a list of any concerns or findings that were identified and a timeline for correction. The expectation (and our experience) is that the vast majority of findings are minor and can be easily corrected. Members of the IBC and the University Research Compliance Office are available to answer questions and help your lab in making any necessary corrections.
If you have specific questions regarding these inspections, do not hesitate to contact our office. Call 532-3224 or email
comply@ksu.edu
.
— Cheryl Doerr, associate vice president for research compliance
|
|
- The next NSF Grants Conference is November 13-14, 2017, in Phoenix, Arizona. Registration opens September 7. Key officials representing each NSF program directorate, administrative office, Office of the General Counsel and Office of the Inspector General will participate. The conference is designed for new faculty, researchers, educators, and administrators who want to gain insight into a wide range of important and timely issues. Visit the conference website for more information.
- Institutional DURC Policy Workshop: To leverage the benefits that come with hindsight, and two years of experiences, the U.S. government is hosting a two-day stakeholder workshop on September 25-26, 2017, in Chicago, Illinois to engage with implementers of the institutional DURC policy. Learn how the DURC policy is being implemented at different institutions, hear about challenges encountered and strategies devised, and share best practices.
- The Blue Ribbon Study Panel on Biodefense will host a special meeting called Biological Attribution: Challenges and Solutions in Washington, D.C. on Monday, October 3. Registration details are forthcoming.
|
|
Preparing a budget can be one of the most intimidating parts of developing a proposal.
Our budget worksheets and other guidance materials can help. Find the following
on our budgets page
.
- Long worksheet: This customizable spreadsheet helps you create a budget with comments and notes; each year is on a separate tab, with a summary tab for all years
- Abbreviated worksheet: This spreadsheet helps you develop a five-year budget on one page
- Industry/fully loaded budget worksheet: Convert a typical university budget to a fully burdened budget with this worksheet
- Sample budgets and budget justifications
- Fringe benefit and Facilities and Administrative Cost rates
- and more!
Contact PreAward Services with questions at 532-6804.
|
|
Agency news and trending topics
|
|
Businesses spent $356 billion on research and development performance in the United States in 2015, a 4.4% increase over the $341 billion spent in 2014. Funding from the companies' own sources was $297 billion in 2015, a 5.0% increase from the $283 billion spent in 2014. $22 billion (6%) was spent on basic research, $56 billion (16%) on applied research, and $278 billion (78%) on development.
For years, U.S. forecasters have envied their colleagues at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in Reading, U.K., whose hurricane prediction models remain the gold standard. Infamously, the National Weather Service (NWS) in 2012 failed to predict Hurricane Sandy’s turn into New Jersey, whereas ECMWF was spot on. But two innovations tested during Hurricane Harvey, one from NASA and another from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), could help level the playing field.
Read a newsletter from a project of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. This issue contains information on diverging trends in completions of advanced humanities degrees, an Andrew W. Mellon Foundation grant for projects intended to demonstrate the value of the humanities in public life, and more.
Multiple researchers who received grants from the US Department of Energy (DOE) say that they have been asked to remove references to “climate change” and “global warming” from the descriptions of their projects, they say.
A big waste of money or the engine of marketplace innovation? That's how some people see basic scientific research. Now a new study shows how basic research and inventions are connected.
|
|
k-state.edu/research
researchweekly@k-state.edu
785.532.5011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|