Dear Independent School Board Members,

 

While boards should spend most of their time on strategic and generative issues, they do have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure the school is operating efficiently. One way to achieve this is for the head to share a heat map of key metrics.

 

The board and head should identify the relevant metrics in advance, based on key operating goals and strategic initiatives. The number of metrics presented should be reasonable, preferably no more than 20, and easily understandable.

 

Operating Metrics


Each of these variable metrics should be presented with YTD data as well as the average for the last three years:


  • Inquiries
  • Applications
  • Annual fund - amount of money raised
  • Annual fund - percentage of parents participating
  • Amount of revenue collected
  • Amount of money spent
  • Percentage of variation in revenue and expenses from the annualized budget

It may make sense to use additional or different metrics depending on the school’s current operating position and strategic priorities.



Note that the metrics identified above are variable. This allows the board to see progress over the course of the year. Comparing this year’s metrics to last year’s or a running three-year average provides the context to understand if the current numbers are on track, a reason to celebrate, or a cause for concern.

Annually, the board should see fixed metrics alongside three-year averages.


Some fixed metrics might include:


  • Total enrollment and enrollment by division
  • Percentage of student and staff attrition
  • Diversity in both staff and students
  • Monies raised the prior year


Additionally, be sure to review:


  • End of the year budgetary surplus or deficit
  • Endowment holdings and growth over the prior year compared to an appropriate index

These metrics, while incredibly important, do not provide insight into the fundamental mission of the school -- educating students. Unfortunately, the quality of the education delivered is not easily quantifiable.


Boards and heads working in partnership can attempt to identify proxies to measure the strength of the program. Yet many of the most obvious proxies do not actually measure the strength of the program. For instance, standardized test scores often measure the IQs of accepted students and the socioeconomic status of their parents rather than actual student growth.

In trying to measure academic excellence, consider this quotation attributed to Albert Einstein:


“Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.”


A smart board knows what to count and what to evaluate by using other measurements.

 
 
 

IN JANUARY: We'll explore recruiting new board members.

 

SUBSCRIBE! If this was forwarded to you and you would like to be added to the distribution list, you may do so here.

 

Board Evaluation

SAIS's Governance Health Check is one way for a board to assess its performance.


Trustee Education

SAIS's trustee webinar series highlights need-to-know topics for heads and boards: Jan 23, Feb 20, April 18. 5-6 PM ET.

 
 
 
 
Facebook  Twitter  Instagram  Youtube