Schultz's Bridge   
SRSCRO logo -no background  
The Bridge 
Updates from the SRSCRO
January 2018
Follow us on Twitter!
Rick McLeod @atomicasset Follow us on Twitter
Mindy Mets @nuclearstem Follow us on Twitter
STEM Challenge Finalists
 
The team comprised of the SC Promise Zone, led by SouthernCarolina Alliance (SCA), and the SRS Community Reuse Organization (SRSCRO) was selected as a national finalist in the US2020 STEM Coalition Challenge, a competition for communities across the country to develop cross-sector partnerships to bring quality hands-on STEM mentoring and maker-centered learning to underrepresented students. The SC Promise Zone worked in collaboration with the SRSCRO on the effort to expand STEM learning, related to career development, in Allendale, SC.  As a finalist, the team will move forward to compete for $1 million in resources to implement new strategies that represent some of the most innovative approaches to tackling the opportunity gap through STEM (science, technology, engineering and math).
 
The national Challenge received 92 applications from 82 communities across 35 states, representing more than 1,800 nonprofit, companies, school districts, and local government partners.
 
Finalists were evaluated based on their potential for impact, approach to partnership building, creative engagement strategies, and sustainability planning. Finalists will gather on January 31 for the STEM Collaboratory, a two-day workshop in Pittsburgh, PA, where they will be joined by STEM experts and creative community builders. The event will allow finalists to share, learn, and inspire one another to build local movements and bridge the opportunity gap.
 
Allendale community leaders are working with SC Promise Zone leaders, SCA, and the SRSCRO to develop community partnerships that expand STEM mentorship and maker-centered learning for students in Allendale, SC.
 
Winners will be announced in Spring 2018. The $1 million in total prize value will be shared across eight winners and is comprised of financial, consulting, and staff support.
 
Click here for more information.

DOE-HQ Reorganization

In December, U.S. Energy Secretary Rick Perry made a major reorganization of the Department of Energy (DOE), separating the department's science and energy components. The new alignment means DOE will have three undersecretaries-for science, energy, and nuclear security.

The reorganization will not affect the duties of the undersecretary for nuclear security, who also leads the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). However, under the new arrangement, the energy programs and Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) will fall under the purview of the new undersecretary of energy, Mark Menezes. The Office of Science and the Office of Environmental Management will answer to the new undersecretary for science, Paul Dabbar.

The Office of the Under Secretary for Science will oversee the Office of Science and the department's national laboratories. It also will oversee the offices responsible for nuclear weapons cleanup, the offices of Environmental Management and Legacy Management, which were moved from the previous Office of Under Secretary for Management and Performance.

The Office of the Under Secretary for Energy will retain its applied science programs - the offices of Fossil Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Nuclear Energy, and Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability - as well as the Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs. Additions include the Loan Programs Office and the Office of Policy, which used to be called Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis.

Click here for the full-page organization chart .


NDAA 2018

In December, President Donald Trump signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2018 into law. This bill authorizes FY2018 appropriations and sets forth policies for Department of Defense (DOD) programs for military activities and for defense activities of the Department of Energy (DOE). It does not provide budget authority, which is provided in subsequent appropriations legislation, yet to be voted on.

Three significant sections of the NDDA 2018 of local interest are highlighted below:

*    SEC. 3121. USE OF FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND PROJECT SUPPORT ACTIVITIES RELATING TO MOX FACILITY. See SEC. 3121 for link.
In General - Except as provided by subsection (b), the Secretary of Energy shall carry out construction and project support activities relating to the MOX facility using funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2018 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for the MOX facility.
(NOTE: Under subsection (b) the Secretary may waive the requirement under subsection (a) above to carry out construction and project support activities relating to the MOX facility if the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees several commitments.)

*    SEC. 3139. EVALUATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE. See SEC. 3139 for link.
The Secretary of Energy shall conduct an evaluation of the feasibility, costs, and cost savings of classifying covered defense nuclear waste as other than high-level radioactive waste, without decreasing environmental, health, or public safety requirements. Not later than February 1, 2018, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the evaluation under this subsection. The term "covered defense nuclear waste" means radioactive waste that resulted from the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel that was generated from atomic energy defense activities and that: (A) contains more than 100 nCi/g of alpha-emitting transuranic isotopes with half-lives greater than 20 years; or (B) may be classified, managed, treated, and disposed of, regardless of origin or previous classification, as other than high-level radioactive waste.

*    SEC. 3141. PLUTONIUM CAPABILITIES. See SEC.3141 for link.
Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of Defense a report on the recommended alternative endorsed by the Administrator for recapitalization of plutonium science and production capabilities of the nuclear security enterprise. (NOTE: See related story on Pit Production Resolutions)


Pit Production Resolutions

The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) told Congress in early November that it aspires to have the infrastructure and ability to build 10 war-ready plutonium pits per year by 2024 and between 50 and 80 pits per year by 2030 to maintain "the safety, security, and effectiveness of the nuclear stockpile over the next 25 years."

According to a leaked report by the NNSA in December, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) may lose a project to produce plutonium pits to South Carolina. LANL hasn't made a pit since 2011, and never made more than 11 in any year between 1992 - when the Rocky Flats nuclear facility where pits were formerly made was closed - and 2011.

The report PowerPoint slides suggests that out of five potential sites, it would be most costly - possibly as much as $7.5 billion - to continue making plutonium pits at Los Alamos and that it could be 2038 before the lab would be able to meet production goals.

It is expected a more detail report from a team of external and internal NNSA engineering experts will further analyze the two options that were identified as part of the earlier report that looked at the most efficient and cost effective means of making the pits. The options include leaving the work to Los Alamos National Laboratory or moving it to the U.S. Energy Department's Savannah River Site in South Carolina.

In the recent battle of resolutions, the Santa Fe Council passed a resolution on Oct. 25 calling for Los Alamos National Laboratory to halt plutonium pit manufacturing and that the New Mexico Environment Department and the lab modify a 2016 consent order that governs the cleanup of legacy waste.

In contrast, the cities of North Augusta and Aiken, as well as Aiken County, have passed resolutions indicating a willingness to host the mission at SRS. It appears similar resolutions are being considered by Barnwell County in South Carolina, and Augusta and Columbia County in Georgia.

FONSI
 
Do not confuse Fonzie with FONSI!

On December 20, 2017, the Department of Energy (DOE) released the Final Environmental Assessment for the Acceptance and Disposition of Spent Nuclear Fuel Containing U.S.-Origin Highly Enriched Uranium from the Federal Republic of Germany (DOE/EA-1977) (Spent Nuclear Fuel from Germany EA). DOE prepared this Spent Nuclear Fuel from Germany EA to evaluate potential environmental impacts of the receipt, storage, processing and disposition of certain spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from a research and development program of the Federal Republic of Germany (Germany). DOE is considering the feasibility of accepting this SNF containing U.S.-origin highly enriched uranium (HEU) at DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) for processing and disposition.

Based on the analysis in the Spent Nuclear Fuel from Germany EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the environment within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and thus does not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement. This Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) does not constitute a decision to select any alternative, and it is not a decision to proceed with the project.

This FONSI is not a decision to select any alternative or to proceed with the proposed project. DOE would continue to conduct research and development and technology maturation studies, paid for by Germany, to further refine the carbon digestion process and the engineering and safety requirements for implementation of the action alternatives, including modification of existing facilities and installation of new capabilities that may be required. As these studies proceed, DOE will provide updates about the progress of technology development and any decisions on acceptance of the material.

This FONSI and the Spent Nuclear Fuel from Germany EA are available on the DOE NEPA website at the following links:
 
FONSI -   
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel From Germany EA -   
  
 
 
 
In This Issue
 
STEM Career Connections 2017 Video  
     
 
What happens at STEM Career Connections? Watch this 3-minute video to learn what employers told students about Science, Technology, Engineering and Math careers in the SRSCRO region at the recent event.
 
 
 (Not So)  
Fun Facts  
Gov't Shutdown 
     
 
What is a shutdown?
Federal government shutdowns occur when spending bills expire, and Congress and the president find themselves at an impasse.
 
In a shutdown, who works and who doesn't?
During the 2013 shutdown, as many as 850,000 workers were furloughed per day, or about 40% of the federal workforce (not counting active-duty military personnel and U.S. Postal Service workers). Roughly 6.6 million employee work days were lost in the 2013 shutdown, with "furloughs affecting workers at the vast majority of agencies," according to the Office of Management and Budget.

How is the military affected?
Active-duty military personnel have always been required to work through shutdowns. Army troops don't abandon their posts and naval ships don't all return to port. In addition, many civilian workers in the Defense Department have been ordered to work through shutdowns.  Other civilian workers in the Defense Department, however, hold jobs that do not meet the urgency threshold to keep working. In 2013, the government furloughed about half of its civilian workers, or about 400,000 employees, leaving a patchwork of various permissible and impermissible activities, according to Federal News Radio.  Meanwhile, veterans' health services would generally continue unabated.

How does a shutdown affect ordinary Americans?
During a shutdown, some government functions may continue, either because Congress has already passed a spending bill for a particular department, because an agency is reliant on funding other than congressional appropriations, or because it is considered vital for the safety of human life or the protection of properties.
However, many activities cease for as long as a shutdown is under way. Here are just a few of the activities that have stopped during previous shutdowns, according to the Congressional Research Service:
* New patients were not accepted into clinical research at the National Institutes of Health, and hotline calls about diseases went unanswered.
* The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ceased disease surveillance.
* Recruitment and testing of federal law-enforcement officials stopped, in one case including the hiring of 400 border patrol agents.
* National Park Service sites and national museums and monuments closed to visitors.
* Work on visa and passport services stopped.
* Inspections for food, consumer products, and workplace safety could not be carried out.
* The Internal Revenue Service was unable to verify income and Social Security numbers in 2013, producing a backlog of 1.2 million requests that may have delayed mortgage and loan approvals.

Would a shutdown affect my tax refund?
Possibly. In 2013, some tax refunds were delayed.

Will I stop getting my mail?
The mail will keep coming, because the U.S. Postal Service is not dependent on federal appropriations for its day-to-day operations.

What happens to the courts?
In many cases, courts have been able to shift money around to keep key operations running during previous shutdowns, though some functions - such as the handling of civil cases and building maintenance - were affected.

Would Social Security checks go out?
If past is prologue, then yes.

How much does a shutdown cost?
"A shutdown is a huge waste of taxpayer dollars, disruptive of government operations, and simply bad management," said John Palguta, a former federal human-resources official who is now an adjunct professor at the Georgetown University Public Policy Institute.
The most thorough report examining the 2013 shutdown comes from an Office of Management and Budget analysis.
* $2.5B in compensation costs for furloughed workers (whose lack of pay for two weeks hampered consumer spending);
* 120,000 fewer private-sector jobs created in the first half of October;
* $500M lost in visitor spending because of closed National Parks.;
* $11M in lost National Parks and Smithsonian Institution revenue;
* Interest accrued on billions of dollars of payments owed to third parties that the government was unable to pay during the shutdown;
* Resources spent on putting activities in standby or maintaining them in an idle mode;
* 1.2 million Internal Revenue Service identity verification requests that couldn't be processed, causing a delay in private-sector lending and other activities;
* Stalled approvals from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration delayed moving products to market.

Are the workers who stay on the job paid?
Not immediately, at least. Employees who are required to work are not paid until a new spending bill is passed- meaning they are effectively working for free, at least temporarily. Furloughed workers have historically been compensated for back pay through subsequent congressional action, though there is no requirement that such a bill be passed. In 2013, the Office of Management and Budget estimated that $2.5B in pay and benefits was paid for hours not worked government-wide.

Can furloughed employees go to work if they want?
No, furloughed employees are barred from working during a shutdown, "except to perform minimal activities as necessary to execute an orderly suspension of agency operations," according to the Office of Personnel Management. "An agency may not accept the voluntary services of an employee."


 
Upcoming Events

The 2018 SRSCRO meeting schedule is available at http://www.srscro.org/meetings/ 
  
Closing Thoughts

"Be at war with your vices, at peace with your neighbors, and let every new year find you a better man." -- Benjamin Franklin

"I think in terms of the day's resolutions, not the year's." -- Henry Moore

"Every man regards his own life as the New Year's Eve of time." -- Jean Paul

"If youth knew; if age could." -- Sigmund Freud

"The art of being happy lies in the power of extracting happiness from common things."
-- Henry Ward Beecher

"There is nothing which we receive with so much reluctance as advice." -- Joseph Addison

"We grow small trying to be great." -- E. Stanley Jones

Contact Information
SRSCRO, PO Box 696, Aiken, SC 29802   Like us on Facebook
 
Staff: 
Rick McLeod - President/CEO - 803-508-7402
Mindy Mets - NWI® Program Manager - 803-508-7403
Amy Merry - Administrative & Business Manager - 803-508-7401
Kim Saxon - Assistant Coordinator - 803-508-7656
  
Quick Links