Aligned Grey and White.png


Monthly Update



September 19, 2025

Federal News

DOE redirects funds, reshaping support for colleges, charters, and civics


The U.S. Department of Education recently announced a set of historic grant investments totaling more than $1.1 billion. These include:


  • $500 million for charter schools, the largest single-year investment in the federal Charter Schools Program.
  • $495 million in additional funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Tribal Colleges or Universities (TCUs), a one-time increase to HBCU funding by 48% and more than doubles annual support for TCUs.
  • $160 million for American history and civics programs, tied to the upcoming 250th anniversary of the nation’s founding.


The money comes primarily from cuts to other Minority-Serving Institution (MSI) programs, including grants for Predominantly Black Institutions (PBIs) and Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs). About $350 million in discretionary MSI funds were discontinued and reprogrammed, while mandatory MSI funds appropriated by Congress remain in place.


Education Secretary Linda McMahon described the decision as shifting resources “away from ineffective and discriminatory programs toward those which support student success.”


Department officials have cited legal concerns with programs tied to racial or ethnic enrollment thresholds, pointing to a U.S. Justice Department memo and ongoing litigation. Critics argue the move reflects a broader rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in higher education.


The reallocation comes as Congress continues to operate under a continuing resolution (CR) for FY 2025. A CR funds agencies at prior-year levels but gives the executive branch more discretion in how to spend discretionary dollars. The Department has exercised that authority to channel funds into its top priorities: HBCUs and TCUs, charter schools, and civics education.


Whether this use of discretion withstands legal scrutiny remains to be seen. For decades, Congress has funded HBCUs, HSIs, and other MSIs through programs with bipartisan support. Redirecting dollars away from some institutions and programs while boosting others represents a significant departure from precedent.


Charter schools in focus


A central part of the announcement was a record $500 million investment in charter schools — the largest in the program’s history. The Department tied the expansion to stagnant NAEP results, framing the grants as a way to expand parent choice and grow high-performing schools.


Funds will be awarded competitively to state education agencies, nonprofit charter networks, and developers of new schools, with a new Model Development and Dissemination grant created to spread effective charter practices nationwide.


Supporters have praised the infusion as overdue support for innovation and choice, while critics question whether expanding charters with funds cut from MSIs pits communities and institutions against one another.


Regional impact


This funding shift has direct implications for our region. Lincoln University in Jefferson City, Missouri, is one of the nation’s 102 HBCUs and a land-grant institution founded by African American Civil War veterans.


In Kansas, Haskell Indian Nations University in Lawrence is one of only two federally operated tribal universities in the country, serving Native students from across the United States. Both institutions could see meaningful new investment.


Missouri, which has one of the nation’s larger concentrations of charter schools in St. Louis and Kansas City, could also see benefits from the $500 million infusion as state entities and networks compete for new federal grants.


Broader reactions


National organizations like the United Negro College Fund (UNCF) welcomed the announcement, noting that HBCUs have historically played an outsized role in serving Pell Grant–eligible and first-generation students. Lodriguez Murray, UNCF’s senior vice president for public policy, argued that “HBCUs deserve this funding” because of their long track record of open enrollment and effective outcomes.


Others expressed concern that the reallocation undermines MSIs such as HSIs and PBIs, which collectively educate millions of students of color. Marybeth Gasman, director of the Rutgers Center for Minority Serving Institutions, cautioned that “none of these institutions should be pitted against each other,” noting that many serve working-class students with limited access to four-year colleges.


The funding increases for charter schools, HBCUs, and civics education are one-time infusions under FY 2025 appropriations. Their permanence will depend on congressional negotiations over a long-term budget and the outcome of legal challenges.

Missouri News

Aligned joins the Missouri school funding conversation


Missouri’s School Funding Modernization Task Force is taking a closer look at how the state funds K–12 education. Created by Governor Mike Kehoe earlier this year, the task force is charged with rethinking the 20-year-old foundation formula.


With four specialized working groups now underway, the effort has more than doubled in size. Subject-matter experts from across the state have been invited to help tackle complex questions around local tax effort, performance incentives, student counts, and funding targets.


Aligned is honored to share that our President and CEO, Torree Pederson, was selected to serve on the performance indicators working group. This group is exploring how Missouri might incentivize schools for measurable improvements in student outcomes — an issue with both promises and risks.


Working groups gather to discuss issues, find solutions


On September 17, members of the local effort factors working group met to discuss the current formula’s heavy reliance on property taxes. This group will grapple with how the formula assumes property values from 2004-5, an outdated approach that has created wide disparities in actual funding levels used to determine state calculations.


The group explored options to unfreeze local property values to reflect current valuations, reflect districts’ real tax effort, and potentially incorporate local income levels into a new formula. Members also acknowledge the challenge of aligning potential changes to local effort with ongoing debates surrounding property tax policy statewide.


That same afternoon, the performance indicators working group held its opening session. Members discussed potential ways Missouri could incorporate outcome-based funding incentives. Ideas included tying a portion of funding to third grade literacy benchmarks, college and career readiness, among others.


Task force facilitator Kari Monsees cautioned that any system must account for differences in student populations to avoid rewarding already-advantaged school districts.


Several participants highlighted Tennessee’s approach, which directs small incentive amounts toward schools that move English language learners, students from low-income backgrounds, and students with disabilities toward key targets. 


The working groups will meet bi-monthly through the end of the year. Upcoming dates include:


  • Oct. 1 – Local Effort Factors (10:30 AM) & Performance Incentives (1:00 PM)
  • Oct. 7 – Funding Targets (10:30 AM) & Student Counts (1:00 PM)
  • Oct. 15 – Local Effort Factors (10:30 AM) & Performance Incentives (1:00 PM)
  • Oct. 20 – Funding Targets (10:30 AM) & Student Counts (1:00 PM)


Aligned’s Take: Missouri has an opportunity to modernize its funding system to be both adequate and fair. By joining a working group, Aligned will bring the voice of the business community to the table — helping ensure that any changes promote student success, align with workforce needs, and give schools resources to deliver results.


State audit highlights severe financial distress at SLPS


A newly released state audit warns that St. Louis Public Schools (SLPS) could run out of funds by the 2030–31 school year without urgent spending reforms. The audit, led by Missouri State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick, cites widespread financial mismanagement and a lack of board oversight.


Key findings of the audit include:

  • Unapproved high-paying salaries under former superintendent Keisha Scarlett.
  • Questionable expenses, including thousands spent on luxury travel and events.
  • Failure to follow state bidding laws for major purchases.
  • Projected deficits of $35M+ annually could drain reserves by 2031.


SLPS leadership, including Superintendent Millicent Borishade, acknowledged the issues and said new financial controls are already being implemented. The district has hired a new CFO, recalled all credit cards, and adopted updated policies.


However, community leaders and the teacher’s union are calling for greater transparency and a long-term recovery plan beyond school closures and consolidations.


Missouri’s 2025 veto session ends with no veto overrides


Missouri lawmakers met on September 10, 2025, for the constitutionally scheduled veto session to consider Governor Mike Kehoe’s line-item vetoes and other budget cuts. Kehoe issued 208 vetoes and placed 32 expenditure restrictions in the FY26 state operating budget, cutting nearly $300 million in general revenue and restricting about $211 million more.


None of the governor’s vetoes were overturned — no successful override motions were taken during the session.


Alongside the veto session, a special (extraordinary) session addressed two major issues: a proposed change to how citizen-initiated ballot measures work (initiative petition reforms), and a congressional redistricting plan.


In other news


Kansas News

Changes to cut scores: What we do and don’t know


In August, the Kansas State Board of Education approved new cut scores for state assessments in math and English language arts. The Board said the change was needed to correct a long-standing misalignment — Kansas’ benchmarks understated student proficiency.


The decision was framed as necessary to give parents, educators, and policymakers a clearer picture of how Kansas students are actually performing.


At its September meeting, the Board provided a further explanation, introducing concordance tables to help schools and families translate the new scores into past results. Yet beyond these tools, little public-facing data has been released showing how the new cut scores were set or how they connect to actual proficiency.


Kansas in context nationally


Other states have made similar adjustments, with mixed results.


  • Wisconsin (2024) lowered its cut scores, leading to a sudden double-digit jump in proficiency rates. The change drew legislative backlash in part because DPI did not successfully communicate the rationale or the data.
  • Illinois (2025) also changed their cut scores but paired the change with an 18-month process, broad stakeholder input, and clear messaging that the old thresholds misrepresented college readiness. While critics still accused the state of lowering expectations, transparency helped blunt political fallout.


Clear communication and transparent data are essential if changes to cut scores are to build, rather than erode, public trust in student assessments. Aligned has reached out to Kansas Department of Education for further information, but the department has declined to comment at the time of this newsletter.


Aligned’s Take: Cut scores are not just technical adjustments; they define what it means for Kansas students to be on grade level. Without releasing more data as to what's behind these changes, the Board risks undermining public trust and inviting political fights. Kansans need to see not only why cut scores changed but also how the new thresholds align with grade-level expectations and true college and career readiness. Until then, the full impact of this decision remains unclear.


Kansas Education Commissioner to retire


During the September State Board of Education meeting, Dr. Randy Watson announced his retirement after ten years of service as the state’s Commissioner of Education. He will remain the Commissioner until the State Board names his successor.


In a statement released by the Kansas Department of Education, Board Chair Cathy Hopkins said of Dr. Watson, “He’s always asking, ‘how can I make this board function on behalf of Kansas education as its best possible peak?’ He exemplifies that so well.”


During time as Commissioner, Dr. Watson spearheaded the Kansas Can initiative, a vision that attempts to address student achievement and further students’ college and career success.


It will be interesting to see who the State Board names as the new Commissioner. Dr. Watson’s retirement comes at a pivotal time in education policy for the sunflower state, with the prospect of a new funding formula, governor and crop of legislators looming large.


As always, Aligned will bring you more insight when we know more.

Aligned cradle to career event in Topeka

Aligned ends listening tour in Topeka


Aligned has officially wrapped up our 2025 Cradle to Career Listening Tour, concluding in Topeka this month. Over the past few months, we heard from stakeholders across Kansas about pressing education challenges and ideas to address them.


We are grateful to everyone who attended and hosted us along the way. Your insights will directly shape our legislative and organizational priorities in 2026 and beyond. More to come from us on those items — for now, thank you! 


In other news



Featured commentary: Why testing still matters

Aligned’s Eric Syverson recently authored an op-ed in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch on the role of statewide assessments in today’s education policy landscape.


While skepticism toward testing is growing, the piece argues that assessments remain a critical tool for understanding student learning — when designed and used responsibly. Eric highlights research showing how effective teaching measured through student growth can have long-term impacts.


The challenge moving forward is to ensure assessments are fair and meaningful for families and educators.


Read the full op-ed here

See you next month,







Torree Pederson

President

torree@wearealigned.org


Eric Syverson

Director of Policy & Research

erics@wearealigned.org

About Aligned


Aligned is the only state-wide non-profit, nonpartisan business group working in Kansas and Missouri on educational issues impacting the full development of our children, from supporting high-quality early learning to solid secondary programs that provide rigorous academic programs and real-world learning opportunities.


Our vision is that our public education systems in Kansas and Missouri have the resources and flexibility to prepare students to pursue the future of their choice.


We are currently focused on education policies that will strengthen early childhood education, teacher recruitment and retention, and school finance reform.


Learn more about our work.