|
There is a serious danger that the war in the Holy Land will bring down
the entire world economy.
https://i0.wp.com/operationdisclosureofficial.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/unnamed-4.jpg?fit=1176%2C876&ssl=1
This is discussed in more detail in the letter to Seymour Hersh and
the letter to to Jamie Dimon the CEO of J. P. Morgan Chase.
Footnote one:
Mr. Seymour Hersh:
Dear Seymour:
You miss some essential parts of the story of Lyndon Johnson in your essay received today. The key element in America's invasion of South
Vietnam was the concept of communist containment and balance of power. The United States had lost China in 1949, and when combined
with Russia, was shifting the balance of power against the west. Robert McNamara followed Churchill's thinking that the mistake in the
1930s was not moving against Germany at an early point. The battle in Vietnam was containment of the Russian-Chinese axis from taking
over Southeast Asia and then rest of the world. The fake narrative of the Gulf of Tonkin incident served this purpose. South Vietnam in
itself was meaningless.
In a propaganda sense saying you are fighting a war as against Germany in 1930s and 1940s over balance of power does not play well.
The slogans about communism really meant nothing as we were allied with communist Russia against Germany. You could not criticize
Stalin in England without being punished during World War Two. What turned the entire situation around was the Nixon visit to Chairman Mao
on February 21 to February 28 in 1972. This was one of the most gigantic geopolitical victories in the world. The balance of power decisively
shifted against Russia and South Vietnam meant nothing any more relatively speaking. On March 29, 1973 the US left South Vietnam
which looked like a defeat but the US was victorious where it counted: balance of power.
The importance of Afghanistan was the restarting of the heroin operation after 9-11 though 9-11 had nothing to do with that. It was a form of
misdirection. It had relatively little geopolitical significance. Mullah Omar had shut down the heroin operation before that based on religious
reasons. The replacement of cheaper fentanyl for heroin priced Afghanistan heroin out of the market so the US left. The invasion of Iraq
had significance over control of the oil and their desire to shift out of the dollar to euros and Gaddafi had threatened to develop a gold standard
in African to eliminate the dollar in the oil trade so he had to go. The excuse giving for the Iraqi invasion was that they had weapons of mass
destruction but that was hardly so. If we wish to use logic General Eisenhower established the doctrine that concentration of force against an
enemy who had weapons of mass destruction was a violation of the rules of war as the concentrated force could be wiped out while assembling.
Nixon became hugely popular and it went to his head. Now he wanted to neutralize Russia too and traveled to Moscow on May 22 to May
30 1972. And it worked. He formed detente with Russia too. He became the most popular President in American history and the roads
were lined with Americans as his motorcade traveled through America as a Roman Caesar. The deep state and military industrial
complex were happy about China and distressed about Russia as the defense industry and military industrial complex would be
largely shut down. Nixon had to go and he was set up at Watergate on June 17, 1972. You will notice how fast they moved. And he
was shoved out in disgrace. The deep state which controls the media had a heyday on their erstwhile former hero. He turned from being
the greatest President in history to an historic disgrace.
You have rejected what I wrote you on what is happening in Gaza and are handling the Hamas subject as a localized incident forgetting
about the geopolitical implications that govern this problem as you did during the Vietnam War. The battle here is over who will control
the oil production of the entire world and thus the world. On the Russian front we are talking about 23 million barrels a day of oil in
what is Russia and what was formally Russia that they can easily take over when they wish, and control of the Pivot of Mackinder,
and in the Middle East control of another 22 million barrels a day going through the Straits of Hormuz. That is about half the world
oil supply. Israel here is our aircraft carrier. That is all. It means nothing else to the deep state of the United States. See footnote one
for a deep analysis of these issues.
First Mackinder. The battle in the Ukraine was a geopolitical effort to overthrow Putin for Medvedev, and make Russia again an ally
of the United States as in 1991which latter year was a geopolitical earthquake. The US in 1991 now had under their belt Russia,
China and Europe and the world was ours. The eleven aircraft carrier task forces and submarines controlled the oceans. The deep
state was giddy with success and it went to their head. The control of Eurasia from Europe to China is the control of the world as
Halford Mackinder wrote in 1904. And it combined for the US the control of the oceans. The combined GDP of Europe, Russia
and China is over twice that of the United States based on GDP PPP. The US has lost China and Russia and there is some question
whether our submarine and surface fleets are obsolete.
In 1904 it was thought that the control of the oceans by Britannia was the control of the world that London exercised from 1588 after
the defeat of the Spanish Armada and the British were now saying in 1904 that such a control was shifting to land. London had to stop
the rise of Russia who covered the Pivot and Germany, who was building a fleet to fight for naval dominance, had to be stooped. Here
was a double threat. This is what World War One was all about forgetting about the propaganda. It was a great Anglo-Saxon success
as both Germany and Russia were defeated leaving London in control of the sea and the Eurasian land mass also in control of the west.
Lenin-Trotsky were actually Rothschild or western assets as Baron Eduard de Rothschild has sponsored their rise. Stalin reversed that
control later. London's hope in World War Two was to see again Russian and Germany destroyed.
World War Two was a repeat of World War One with the Anglo-Saxons fighting the alliance of Germany and Japan against Russia for
control of the Eurasian land mass. Germany in World War Two knocked out France and sought to knock out Russia while Japan
was fighting China for geopolitical mastery of the Eurasian land mass. The US had to foment a war with Japan to get into the fray before
it was too late and blockaded Japan's oil to encourage her to attack the US. In World War One, Germany who had been building a fleet
to knock out Britannia, sought to knock out Russia and Europe. China was not a factor then.
This geopolitics was realized in this exchange between Goering and Hitler:
Goring: They (Britain and America) entered the war so that we would not reach the east (Japan in China), but not so the East (Russia) would reach the Atlantic.
Hitler: That's quite clear.
Source: "Hitler And His Generals", the stenographic record of military conferences, page 649.
And by Stalin:
We (Milovan Djilas and Stalin) stopped on our way to the dining room to view a map on the wall of the world where the Russia was colored in red. Stalin waved his hand over Russia and said: "They (the US and Britain) will never accept the idea of such a great space should be red, never, never!"
"Conversations with Stalin" by Milovan Djilas, page 74.
The problem now in Gaza is turning the entire Middle Eastern Islamic nations against the United States so the US has its hands full trying
to destroy Russia on one side to regain the control of its oil which was placed in the hands of their Rothschild oligarchs and maintain
control of the Middle East where it had worked out an alliance with most of the Islamic powers excluding Iran to join
with Israel to control the oil. Israel was the US aircraft carrier. The Gaza crisis is blowing this up. The Gaza crisis is over the control of
the Middle Eastern oil and nothing else. The US is beside itself as it all of a sudden is losing the whole Middle East over Gaza. There is a
direct connection to the war in the Ukraine and the war in the Middle East as it is over the geopolitical control of the world.
How is this going to turn out.? The key is the firing of Victoria Nuland. The US is going to give up the Ukraine for detente with Russia
and then focus on trying to hold onto control of the Middle East. We see the United States forcing a deal on Gaza with Israel before it
loses the whole Middle East.
With best wishes.
David
Footnote two:
Letter to Jamie Dimon:
Mr. Jamie Dimon
J. P. Morgan Chase
Dear Jamie:
Here is a summary of the problem the international banking system faces if the BRICS, Arabian and
Russian producers cut off the oil that Washington has not addressed in the calculations of the dangers
that we face which are not entirely of a military nature in the Middle East.
With best wishes.
David
618 TRILLION NOTIONAL DERIVATIVE VALUATION
I was called upon to handle the 1987 emergency stock market crash and my point man at the Fed was Ted Truman. I just noticed an article that Ted Truman just wrote in the Financial Times so he is alive and kicking in his eighties. We just ordered the major firms to reverse their cash settlement rigs. Ted understood everything in a minute. He was the George Smiley at the Fed of the John Le Carre novels. What had happened was the major Wall Street firms were then experimenting with a new vehicle called cash settlement which they would use to move the market up by placing their cash settlement positions above the market that settled for cash before they moved the market up and below when they would move the market down. It took less money to move the indexes than they received from the cash settlement derivatives and settled their profits in cash. The swings became too large and went out of control on the downward swing.
The self-correcting mechanism of buying back the security to cover the short was eliminated.
We came in to order the players to place their positions above the market and drive it upwards coordinated with the Federal Reserve System which worked. The atmosphere was painted in the background by executives proclaiming they were buying their own stocks because the valuations were so cheap. A detailed explanation as to what happened is given in a link below entitled "Straits of Hormuz" under the subtitle "Stochastic Control Theory".
https://operationdisclosureofficial.com/2022/02/16/the-straits-of-hormuz-as-a-trigger-to-world-depression/
I was also involved in ending the other grand manipulation of 2008 which forced the issuance of 27 trillion dollars in Federal Reserve Credit as they hesitated to follow my advice when in 1987 there are hardly a ripple. I was preoccupied in another emergency situation for the United States in 2008 but wrote out the rescue plan but they delayed its implementation for two months requiring 27 trillion dollars of new Federal Reserve Credit based on the delay when I came back to implement the plan. This could just as easily been rescued as in 1987. In matters such as this he who hesitates is lost.
When love once pleas admission to our hearts
(In spite of all the virtue we can boast)
The woman that deliberates is lost.
If we wish to understand what this meant from 1913-1914 to 2008 about two trillion of Federal Reserve Credit had been created. When I came in we had to create 27 trillion dollars to save the situation all of which was subsequently paid back. But we never showed any Federal Reserve Credit having been above two trillion dollars in 2008 as that would have created a world crisis which you can see for yourself in the third link. Here are the links. Link one covers the 27 trillion dollar cover on top of the two trillion base for their mistake, and link two the Federal Reserve balance sheet for 2008 showing no relative increase in credit which report was false.
https://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_698.pdf
Recent balance sheet trends
Today we face another potential crisis of even greater magnitude as outlined below as our ability to control it is limited as the players are outside of our jurisdiction as noted in the next two quotes. The solution requires an understanding of the great danger the international financial system is in and requires decisive action to forestall an Arabian and Russian cutoff of potentially 25 to 50 percent of the world oil supply that would irretrievably implode the international financial system.
Here are warnings:
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani warning supplies of Middle East oil to international markets could be put off because of the Israel-Gaza War.
The other reason this is very significant is because if a larger war were to kick off, oil would become the primary geostrategic global lightning rod. That’s because Iran can wreak havoc on global markets, transits via the known chokepoints of the Persian Gulf, etc. This is underscored by the fact that the Iranian minister called for a total oil embargo on Israel during this meeting:
Iranian Foreign Minister: We call on a total oil and gas embargo by the Islamic countries against nations that support Israel
| 
