|
Anyone who knows me—or the dedicated professionals in the Washington County Auditor’s Office—knows we’re passionate about quality data. Good data is accurate, complete, timely, and unbiased. It reflects reality—not someone’s narrative. It’s the bedrock of informed decisions, responsible budgeting, and public trust.
Good data does not come easy. It takes effort! Once we have it, we must protect it from being distorted, manipulated, or cherry-picked.
Cherry-picking is dangerous. It is the practice of selecting only the data that supports a particular argument, while ignoring the rest. It misleads. It distorts. It undermines public confidence. We’ve seen troubling examples at the national level—data being denied, dismissed, or weaponized for political purposes. I worry about the ripple effects of that here at home. If we can’t trust the integrity of our information, how can we trust the decisions based on it?
As your County Auditor, I believe skepticism is healthy—but it must be constructive. Asking tough questions, checking sources, and demanding transparency isn’t cynicism — it’s good social responsibility.
In my office, we live and breathe professional skepticism. That means:
- We test data before we trust it.
- We ask and investigate: Is this accurate? Is it complete? Is it relevant?
- We seek reasonable assurance, not spin.
- We check each other’s work, and we, ourselves, are audited to ensure our standards remain high.
And no—we’re not perfect. Sometimes the truth is murky, and sometimes we have to work with samples because of limited resources. Our commitment is clear: objectivity, independence, and accuracy in service of you, the public.
In an era where misinformation seems to spread faster than facts, we need to double down on truth. Not just abstract truth—but documented, defensible, accessible truth. And that’s what good data gives us. That’s also why I believe our systems need to evolve, even here in the metro area:
-
We need stronger safeguards in the local government charters and/or code to protect the independence of Auditor’s Offices.
- We need to expand our authority to do performance audits and access to information of any public entities under those jurisdictions, including those currently exempt from audit review.
- And we need to invest in transparency, not fear it.
If you’ve read an audit report and have questions—reach out. My office welcomes them. We don’t hide from scrutiny; we embrace it. If we want better government, we have to start with good information.
In this time of confusion and complexity, let me leave you with this:
Be skeptical. Ask questions. Demand context. Don’t settle for cherry-picked answers.
Your government should work for you, and that starts with giving you the whole picture.
|