The ASCE San Francisco
575 Market St, Suite 400 | San Francisco, CA 94105
415-546-6546 | htpp://www.asce-sf.org
|
October 2021, Volume 70, No. 10
|
|
WELCOME THE NEW 2021-2022 ASCE BOARD MEMBERS
|
|
|
Vice President, Rupeet Malhotra
|
|
|
President-Elect, Rami Selim
|
|
2021 SAN FRANCISCO SECTION ANNUAL MEETING AND AWARDS GALA
The ASCE San Francisco Section celebrated the wide array of outstanding work being done throughout the Section on September 23rd at our Annual Meeting and Awards Gala. This year’s event took place via Zoom. Outstanding Project and Individual Awards were presented to deserving members.
PROJECT WINNERS
|
|
Airports and Ports Project
Architectural Engineering Project
Bikeways and Trails Project
Bridge Project
Community Improvement Project
Construction Project
Energy Project
Environmental Engineering Project
Flood Management
Geotechnical Project
Historical Renovation Project
Parks and Recreation Project
Seismic Retrofit Project
Small Project
Structural Engineering Project
Sustainable Engineering Project
Transportation Project
Urban or Land Development
Water Project
|
|
Crane Cove Park
Atlas 385 14th Street
Laton Sidewalk Improvements
Italian Bar Road Bridge over Redinger Lake (San Joaquin
River)
Matilda Torres High School
Pardee Chemical Plant Chemical Feed Shafts
Zero-Emission Vehicles DC Fast Chargers
Seawater Intake Repairs, UCSC Long Marine Lab
Fresno Irrigation District, Central Canal Basin Project, Central and Hughes Avenues
UCSF Nancy Friend Pritzker Psychiatry Building
Claire Lilienthal Elementary School Ground Improvements
Sonoma Valley High School Athletic Field Renovation
Marina Middle School Seismic Retrofit
Outside Canal Bridge Replacement at Russell Avenue
Fresno Canal Bridge Replacement at McKinley Avenue
Creek Fire, Post Fire Runoff Erosion and Sediment Control Project
SB I-680 HOV Lane Completion and Express Lane Conversion
Brooklyn Basin, Parcel F (Vista Estero and Paseo Estero)
Lake Mendocino Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO) Final Viability Assessment (FVA)
|
|
Outstanding Civil Engineer in the Public Sector
Outstanding Civil Engineer in the Private Sector
Outstanding Civil Engineer in Community Service
Outstanding ASCE Section Officer
Outstanding YMF Officer
Outstanding Younger Civil Engineer
Outstanding Branch Officer
Outstanding Faculty Advisor
HJ Brunnier for Outstanding Service to the SF Section
|
|
Joseph Harrell
Rami Selim
Maxwell Armenta
Rupeet Malhorta
Crystal Mena
Seema Barua
Erin Dupree
Dr. Aly Tawfik
Jim Small
|
|
Congratulations to Recipients of the 2020 SEI of ASCE,
San Francisco Chapter Scholarship!
The scholarship committee received applications from undergraduate and graduate students at four of the universities served by the San Francisco Chapter of ASCE. We were impressed by every application. Four scholarship recipients were selected based on academic achievements, extracurricular activities, career goals, and financial needs. The scholarship recipients demonstrated impressive commitment and passion for structural engineering. Each of the four winners this year received a $500 scholarship award. We look forward to continuing the SEI-SF scholarship program in 2022.
|
|
FOLLOW THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
by Eugene Bass
A water district sued a contractor who built a new highway in Marin County under a contract with Cal Trans. The new highway was built to replace an old highway and roughly paralleled it. Where the new highway crossed a swamp, mud was twenty to sixty feet deep. The mud area between the old and new highways in some places was only thirty feet wide. The method of construction called for by the plans and specifications was to pile sufficient rock and dirt on the mud to cause it to settle through the mud to solid ground thus creating a solid bed for the new highway. The result of following this method of construction was to displace the mud outward from the new roadway and toward the existing highway. The displacement of mud against the old highway caused it to move in some places as much as ten feet.
The existing highway contained various utilities including water, gas, and sewer lines. The displacement due to the surcharge caused the water district's pipeline to buckle and break resulting in a lawsuit against the contractor by the water district.
At the trial of the case, a judgment was rendered against the contractor, finding that the damages for injury to the water district’s pipeline were caused by the contractor's negligence in constructing the new highway. The contractor appealed the case and the appellate court reversed the lower court decision, finding that the contractor was not negligent.
On appeal, it was shown that the contractor, as well as the state engineers, knew of the existence of the water pipeline. The contract between the state and contractor expressly called the attention of the contractor to the fact that certain water, gas, and sewer lines were buried within the limits of the work to be done, and provided that: "The contractor shall take every precaution to protect and preserve such lines from injury or damage during construction operations." In addition, the evidence at trial showed that the work of the contractor was planned by the state engineers and that the actual construction work was supervised and directed by the state engineers. The work done conformed in every detail to the plans and specifications furnished by the state, and everything done by the contractor was approved by the state engineers. It was also shown that prior to the commencement of construction the state informed the water district by letter of the proposed construction and warned it to protect its property.
The appellate court noted that the trial court found, that the contractor had followed the plans and specifications exactly, and constructed the fill as directed by the state engineer, and that the water district was informed of the proposed construction and was furnished plans for the work. Further, the trial court found, that the water district's engineer knew of the day-by-day progress of the work and did not voice any objections. The contractor's witnesses had testified that the method of construction used was proper and there was no other testimony against that opinion. The appellate court thus concluded that it was obvious that in performing the work exactly in accordance with the plans and specifications, and under the supervision of the state engineer, the contractor was not guilty of negligence in the case and overturned the lower court judgment.
The case serves as a direct example of the necessity of following the plans and specifications. With the caveat, however, that if the plans and specifications require something that the contractor believes will cause problems, the contractor should immediately call these concerns to the attention of the appropriate project representative.
This article is intended only to provide general information regarding legal issues. It is not to be relied upon for legal advice. Contact your attorney for advise and guidance on general and specific legal issues.
|
|
NOMINATIONS ARE OPEN FOR REGION 9 GOVERNORS:
SACRAMENTO SECTION (1)
SAN FRANCISCO SECTION (1)
ASCE Region 9 invites nominations for one Region 9 Governor from the Sacramento Section and one Region 9 Governor from the San Francisco Section for a three-year term beginning October 1, 2022. To be considered for this position, you must be a Society member in Good Standing and have an Address of Record within the Section being represented. It is encouraged that nominees also have prior service as a Branch, Section or Institute officer, member of a Section or Branch committee, or a member of a Society-level Committee with demonstrated leadership skills. These are elected positions under the election procedures and rules of ASCE.
To apply for either one of these positions, submit the following documents by the deadline of December 1, 2021, to 1) Yazdan Emrani, P.E., Region 9 Nominating Committee Chair, at Yazemrani@gmail.com and 2) Patricia Jones, Managing Director, Executive and Board Operations, ASCE, at PJones@ASCE.org:
- A Letter of Intent to apply for this elected office
- Signed Governor Commitment document (contact Yaz Emrani for form)
- Biographical Statement, not to exceed 200 words
- Vision Statement, not to exceed 200 words
- Any endorsements
- Color headshot photograph
Nominees will be requested to attend a virtual interview before the Region 9 Board of Governors on January 20, 2022, at a time to be set. For questions, please contact Yaz Emrani via email or at (949) 285-8483.
|
|
Thank you to our Bronze Sponsor!
|
|
NEW ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES
Become a sponsor! For more information and to become a sponsor, please contact admin@asce-sf.org or 415-546-6546.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|