Dedicated to the memory of PeaceWorks friend and patron Kozo Yamamura (1934 – 2017)
Supported by Takshila Education Society
|
|
Who is a citizen? What colours an action 'anti-national' or 'national'? What does the ‘law of the land’ say? How do we bring these ideas into our education system? Let's explore this and more at
The Idea of the Indian Constitution
this July!
|
Last date for registration is 10th July, 2019.
|
|
'
He is dirty, he eats beef, that's why I don't sit next to him at lunch
.'
'
I can throw watermelon seeds anywhere, that's why my maid gets paid.'
Society's biases often find clear, unabashed expression in the words of children. What is it that makes a child imbibe/inherit intolerance towards difference, even active hate? How far can we as teachers go in challenging such deep-set beliefs, helping our youth become socially and politically conscious? Can we afford the time to? How?
The increasingly precarious position of the Indian Constitution makes it the perfect place to start.
This conference
, we will work towards understanding key concerns and finding ways of taking this text out of its distant ornate leather bind and to the youth as a living document that shapes their location.
Until then,
LET'S GET LEARNING
!
|
|
The words sound heavy, frozen, intimidating.
What do we know of it? A few fundamental rights, duties, some directive principles maybe. That it is 'the law of the land'. Is this law objective? How have the same words been differently interpreted through the years? How have these altered understandings affected the text itself?
Here are two interesting insights to get us started.
'
Even at the time it was framed, the text was not a closed document....As the chronicler of the constitution, Granville Austin, famously wrote, “Fundamental rights were to be framed among the carnage of fundamental wrongs"...In all, the constituent assembly was just as much as a space of conflict and collegiality, as many current assemblies, and its hallowed status in the country’s history should not blind us to the fact that real individuals and not mythic heroes populated it',
Nandini Sundar writes.
Expanding on the idea of the Constitution as a product of the interplays between the text, the courts and the people, this article talks about the non negotiable values of the Constitution and the limitations of the text that have allowed for varied interpretations, some an effective shrinking of the 'vision of its founders'.
Read the entire article here.
______
We know when the Indian constitution was drafted, implemented, perhaps even how many it was drafted by. But what did it mean in its context? Did it matter to the people of this nascent independent nation?
Rohit De's
A People's Constitution
traces
'
how drinkers, smugglers, petty vendors, butchers, and prostitutes—all despised minorities—shaped the constitutional culture' in nascent independent India. Here's a Ravish Kumar interview of the lawyer and historian of modern South Asia talking about his work.
|
|
______
Students unwilling to do assignments? Spending too much time on the web? Just club the two! Take a look at this Youtube series on constitutional education for inspiration.
|
|
A little of this & that...
|
|
Stone plaques announcing the sovereign authority of the gram sabha dot a rising number of Jharkhand's adivasi villages—the Pathalgadi/Patthargadi movement claims to evoke the Indian Constitution even though it has been accused of being anti-national by State rhetoric. Want to find out more about this movement for self-rule? Take a look at the video above and
this article by Virginius Xaxa
to begin.
|
|
That the Indian Constitution is the longest in the world, is a known fact. But did you know it was originally hand-written?
|
|
|
Not sure how to take constitutional values to young children? Leila Seth's taken care of it with (the illustrated)
We, the Children of India
— a simple, concise read that doesn't compromise on complexity as it introduces young ones to the Preamble of the Constitution.
|
|
|
|
Digital art courtesy: https://www.waqas.art/kipp-harbor-times
|
|
|
|
Shared Histories @ Chandigarh
|
|
This May saw the Chandigarh launch of History for Peace in the form of a history teaching conference that concluded at Le Corbusier's stunning Chandigarh Government Museum & Art Gallery. Among topics covered were regions and religions in pre-Sikhism Panjab, Mughal
Ramayanas
and Jaina
Shahnamas
, teaching Partition as a nation-building exercise, the 'widows of Partition', individual vignettes affected by and affecting history, the princely states of Kapurthala and Kashmir in the wake of 1947.
Read on for more
|
|
While we are on the subject of shared histories,
|
|
Image credit (left)
Iftikhar Dadi
,
(right)
Priya Paul
|
|
h
ere's Yousuf Saeed tracing the politics of representing the nation through pop visual art pre-independence and post-1947 in India and Pakistan.
'
India’s streets, public spaces and homes are filled with colourful, mass-produced images of various kinds, from calendars, religious posters and cinema heroes to large billboards, advertisements and roadside graffiti, all of it reflecting the aesthetics of the masses who revere and celebrate them. While religious iconography, such as that of Hindu gods and goddesses, dominates much of this visual universe, images with Islamic themes are also not far behind. Some scholars studying India’s calendar art have shown how the concept of nationalism, dominated by Hindu revivalist themes, was entrenched among Indian masses through the use of popular art. However, while Hindu images seem to easily adapt to political themes, such as Bhārat Māta (Mother India) being revered both as a religious and nationalistic icon,
[1]
one finds hardly any political content in Muslim calendar art—it is mostly icons of piety, or at the most, nostalgia for a decaying Muslim aristocracy. At least, that is how they have been represented so far.
But does it mean that Indian Muslim society was devoid of political subjects worth making images of? Or is it truly a biased representation of the community as apolitical and pious? Some would say that the religiosity of Muslims was not compatible with Indian nationalism, at least visually, except in the case of their being part of the clichéd images of ‘National Integration’. As a matter of fact, since the creation of Pakistan in 1947, the loyalty of Muslims in India towards their homeland has always been a subject of debate and even discussed in popular culture such as cinema and mainstream media, if not in calendar art...
'
|
|
Phone us at
033 24556942/43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|