The Honey Badger Report #7

Sponsored by Parker Conservatives

Honey Badger Report #7,

October 2023

In this issue:

Why Ken Buck is Woefully Wrong About the January 6 Defendants
Tip of the Hat
Abe Laydon and the Dying Art of Keeping Promises
George Teal's Swamp in the Making
Douglas County's Toddler Tiff Public Servants or Public Nuisances?
Liberty Scorecard, Colorado
Kevin Van Winkle for Douglas County Commissioner
NO Vote on the Douglas County MLO and Why
Douglas County School Board Race this November
Why Coloradans Should Vote "NO" on Proposition HH
Parker Town Council Seats November 2024

Why Ken Buck is

Woefully Wrong About the January 6 Defendants

What a magnificent fall from grace we are witnessing with Representative Ken Buck, a man who would have us believe he stands for justice and liberty. With Buck’s fawning approval of Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Department of Justice's handling of January 6 defendants didn’t just disappoint, it incensed his conservative base and betrayed the ideals he purports to uphold.

Let’s clear the fog here, shall we? Buck, who sits on the House Judiciary Committee, used the weight of his office to lend credence to the political persecution taking place against January 6 defendants. The message was starkly clear, as far as Buck is concerned, if you’re a Trump supporter who took part in the January 6 events, you are not deserving of basic civil liberties. It’s staggering to witness this level of ignorance or willful neglect from someone in his position.

The most glaring issue with Buck's assertion is that January 6 defendants are being treated fairly. If Buck took the time to actually examine the issue rather than reciting media soundbites, he’d realize the glaring miscarriage of justice happening in real-time. Forget the political theater for a second, we’re talking about human beings languishing in prison, subjected to conditions that not even animal rights activists would tolerate for livestock. But to Ken Buck, it seems solitary confinement for these defendants is not a problem. Neither is the blatant bias of some court officials, the inhumane jail conditions, or the denial of access to legal counsel. Somehow, these glaring issues do not qualify as “singling out” for Buck. How illuminating.

Then there’s the matter of Buck’s detachment from the actual violations of constitutional amendments. Does Buck genuinely believe that armed FBI raids, rooftop snipers, and military-style vehicles are appropriate measures against individuals accused of what are, in many cases, misdemeanors? The use of geofence warrants to collect data on citizens, or Big Tech working in cahoots with the FBI, doesn't raise any red flags for Buck. Well, that’s convenient.

For all of his professing about standard procedure, Buck seems to conveniently forget the contrasting treatment of protesters during the 2020 Lafayette Square riots. Those who engaged in far more destructive acts saw their federal cases dropped. This fact alone shreds his argument that January 6 defendants aren’t singled out. And, let’s not overlook the ideological witch-hunt. DOJ’s own sentencing documents often cite memes and social media posts as evidence, turning personal opinions into crimes. Meanwhile, judges are openly hostile to these defendants, questioning their political beliefs as if that’s now a federal offense.

Buck advises us to focus on matters that are more important to the country. But let me be clear, there’s hardly anything more important than the integrity of our justice system and the preservation of our constitutional freedoms. Ken Buck is proving himself to be a paper tiger in a den full of real predators, and it's past time to acknowledge the truth, the man needs to be primaried in 2024. If you're wondering why, just look at his record, complete milquetoast, it could be used as a case study in political appeasement. While he's busy playing nice with the Department of Justice over the January 6th defendants, genuine conservatives are pulling their hair out. Colorado's constituents don't need a middle-of-the-road representative; they need warriors like Lauren Boebert who is willing to stand up against the tidal wave of progressivism that's eroding this nation’s foundation and state. And that's why we need a grassroots conservative to take his place, someone who isn't just reading from the conservative playbook but actually understands the rules of the game.

Now, let me tell you about the grassroots conservatives, the kind who have their fingers on the pulse of real America. They understand the gravity of the situation we're in, from the Orwellian censorship by Big Tech to the radical left's relentless assault on our freedoms. They’re not going to sit around wringing their hands and issuing tepid statements, they’re going to charge into the fray with the Constitution in one hand and common sense in the other. While Buck tells you to "look over there," these grassroots leaders focus on the looming threats right in front of us. In 2024, we don't just need a new representative in Colorado; we need a constitutional gladiator. Anything less is a disservice to the conservative cause and to the American people.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

Thomas Jefferson

"Tip of the Hat" 🎩 this month to El Paso County Republican Party Vice Chairman Todd Watkins for calling-out Ken Buck.

Thank you:

Todd Watkins

Be sure to thank him the next time you see him

Do you know someone that works hard for the greater good? Send me a note with the person's name and why we should highlight them. I'll see about having them in an upcoming issue.

Abe Laydon and the Dying Art of Keeping Promises

Ah, yes, promises. Remember those? In a time when politicians seem to have a harder time keeping a promise than a vegan has avoiding a steakhouse, Douglas County Commissioner Abe Laydon serves as a sparkling example of what's wrong with our public officials today. Laydon had the audacity to attend a $17,400 Harvard leadership program, on the taxpayer's dime, no less, and then act as if he’s the Messiah by offering the public a "Harvard Education for a Nickel."

But let's rewind. Laydon assured the good folks of Douglas County that he'd reimburse the cost of his fancy education. Fast-forward a few months, and the man has had an epiphany. Suddenly, he doesn't want to be "beholden to special interest groups" by seeking scholarships or grants. Well, wasn't that convenient timing? Perhaps the course syllabus skipped the lecture on integrity and keeping one’s word.

Now, Laydon has concocted some intellectual sleight-of-hand to justify his backpedaling. He has the gall to say that the per-person cost to the taxpayers is roughly a nickel. A nickel! As if betrayal has a price cap. As if the cost being low somehow erases the need for accountability. This isn't about nickels; it’s about integrity, or rather, a lack of it.

His latest masterpiece? Offering a free course to impart the pearls of wisdom he gleaned from his taxpayer-funded Harvard adventure. It's like robbing someone and then offering them a discount coupon as compensation. What a deal! But let's not forget, promises aren’t measured in nickels or free courses, they're measured by the character of the one who makes them.

And, let's not let this point drift into the ether, the county has, for two decades, paid for its senior staff members to attend similar programs. So, Laydon, in his infinite wisdom, decided that he, as a Commissioner, should be the first to benefit from this lavish educational voyage. That's right, folks, Laydon is a pioneer, a pioneer in the art of breaking promises and side-stepping accountability.

Laydon tries to wave away his detractors as purveyors of "politically motivated rhetoric." But let's be clear. Pointing out a broken promise isn't political rhetoric. It's the bare minimum we should expect from anyone tasked with the grave responsibility of governance.

So, Commissioner Laydon, if you're listening, here's a piece of advice: If you want to avoid being "beholden" to anyone, start by being beholden to your word and to the taxpayers who you're supposed to serve. Until then, keep the change. We’d rather have integrity.

Sincerely,

The Dying Breed Who Still Value Promises

Let Abe Laydon know what you think of his actions:

Abe Laydon, office 303-660-7401, email, alaydon@douglas.co.us

"An irresponsible person is a person who makes vague promises, then breaks his word, blames it on circumstances and expects other people to forgive it."

Ayn Rand

George Teal's Swamp in the Making

In the squalid quagmires of Washington D.C., the practices of nepotism and cronyism are so common they practically have their own monuments on the National Mall. Politicians swapping favors and backroom deals are the order of the day. And why wouldn't they be? After all, they serve as the oily gears in the rusty, archaic machine we call government.

But you might hope, perhaps naïvely, that this sort of thing would be less prevalent on the local level. Surely, our small-town county politicians wouldn't stoop so low, right? Well, Douglas County Commissioner George Teal appears to be taking notes from the masters of swampcraft in D.C., turning local governance into something that could rival the TV show House of Cards for political maneuverings.

Recently the Douglas County Water Commission was set to discuss what should have been a routine matter, “the inclusion of alternate members.” Then Teal decided to turn the event into his own personal episode of "The Bachelor," handing out roses in the form of commission appointments. These weren't just any appointments; these were handpicked favorites, selected with all the subtlety of the notorious bull in a china shop.

Let's look at some of the nominees, shall we? Jim Maras, a man whose pockets have already been lined with over $80,000 from Douglas County General Fund for a debacle of a project in Perry Park, courtesy of Mr. Teal and his pal Laydon. Clark Hammelman, a former councilman whose seat was conveniently filled by Teal. And Roger Hudson, another councilman and buddy of Teal's, a person known for mailing out hit pieces on Dave Williams the Colorado State GOP Chair.

Sound familiar? It should. It's the kind of self-serving maneuvering we often see in Congress, where politicians reward their top donors with cushy ambassadorships or seat them in influential committees. In Teal's case, several of his nominees are significant donors to his campaign. Shocking, I know.

It's worth mentioning that Teal didn't just nominate individuals for his own district, he also had the audacity to nominate individuals for another district, without any discussion or consent from the commissioner who represents that district. This is like the House Majority Leader deciding unilaterally who will represent the minority party in key committees. Democracy, this is not.

Teal even ventured to nominate Harold Smethills, a Denver resident, to represent Douglas County, the developer of Sterling Ranch. It’s like inviting your cousin from out-of-state to vote in your local elections. To cap it all off, he saw fit to appoint Sean Tonner, the primary operator behind the controversial RWR project. This is the swamp creature inviting another swamp creature to the party. In August 2021 RWR and their friends contributed to pay down George Teal's 2020 campaign debt, about $16,000. Click here to read more about San Luis Valley Water to Douglas County in a past Badger Report.

The truth is, the actions of George Teal are indicative of a broader issue. When local politicians start acting like their federal counterparts, emulating their worst tendencies, it's a sign that the swamp is not confined to the banks of the Potomac. It's spreading, like a virus, into the very communities we call home.

It seems the Douglas County Water Commission is at a crossroads. Will it be filled with genuine experts in water management, or will it become a stomping ground for Teal's political allies? It's a question we should all be asking, not just those in Douglas County but everyone who cares about good governance.

Look, folks, it's high time we cut through the nonsense. George Teal's board nominations are chock-full of developers and business magnates. But let me ask you this, “where are the water experts?” In a state where every drop of water is gold, you'd think we'd have a lineup of people who actually understand the resource. But no. Instead, we get a who's-who of the real estate and construction sectors and the company who stands to make millions on Douglas County water RWR. It's time to drain this swamp of vested interests.

George Teal needs to backtrack, and he needs to do it now. Get rid of anyone with even a whiff of a conflict of interest, especially when it comes to RWR and development. These aren't the people we need making decisions about our water. If we're talking about governance here, let's make sure it's actually, you know, responsible. This board needs to be so clean, so beyond reproach, that even the harshest critics have to admit it's solid. Anything less is just betraying the people of Douglas County. So let's do it already.

We have enough political patronage, back-scratching, and favor-swapping at the federal level. We don't need it infecting our local governments too. But for now, it seems, Douglas County has become a breeding ground for the swamp monsters of tomorrow. And for that, we can thank George Teal. Maybe it is time to find someone for his seat that is not beholden to developers and RWR. George Teal is up for re-election in 2024.

Let George Teal know what you think of his actions:

George Teal, office 303-660-7401, email, gteal@douglas.co.us

Douglas County's Toddler Tiff

Public Servants or Public Nuisances?

Look, folks, I don't think I'm alone when I say that if I wanted to watch a bunch of 3-year-olds squabble over who gets to play with the toy truck, I'd go to a daycare. But instead, we have the Douglas County commissioners—Abe Laydon, George Teal, and Lora Thomas, doing a spot-on impression of children fighting over playground turf.

First off, let's talk about this censure business. Commissioner Thomas gets a formal slap on the wrist for, wait for it, questioning how public funds are distributed by the Douglas County Cultural Council. The gall! It's almost like she forgot that asking where taxpayer dollars go is tantamount to high treason in the game of local politics. Laydon, who's decided he's the classroom monitor in this Kindergarten circus, finds Thomas' questions "disrespectful." Because apparently, in Douglas County, transparency is just a fancy word for insolence.

Then there's the petty popularity contest of kicking Thomas off every committee they can think of. What's next? Are Laydon and Teal going to start passing "Do you like me? Yes, No, Maybe" notes around the office? They've ousted her from the Chatfield Watershed Authority and the Douglas County Housing Partnership. Do Laydon and Teal think they've won a round of "Survivor: Douglas County," voting off someone they see as a threat to their fragile alliance?

I've got to laugh at the irony here. Laydon accuses Thomas of "public shaming" for linking to a public roster of Cultural Council members. But what do Laydon and Teal do? They make sure every board and committee in the county knows about Thomas' censure. Sounds like public shaming to me, but what do I know? I'm just a taxpayer expecting some adult behavior from elected officials.

The sad part is that Douglas County has real issues to deal with. Housing, water quality, community development, you know, adult stuff. But instead, our commissioners are wrapped up in who gets to sit at the "cool table" of local governance.

So, here's my message to the trifecta of Douglas County leadership: Grow up. Get over yourselves. Start doing the jobs you were elected to do, because this ongoing episode of "Real Housewives of Douglas County Commissioners" is getting old. It's time for someone to be the adult in the room. And since it doesn't seem like it'll be any of you three, it's going to have to be the voters who set things straight.

Let your Douglas County Commissioners know what you think:

Abe Laydon, office 303-660-7401, email, alaydon@douglas.co.us

George Teal, office 303-660-7401, email, gteal@douglas.co.us

Lora Thomas, office 303-660-7401, email, lthomas@douglas.co.us

The Colorado House is out of session until January 2024. Here are the final Liberty Scorecards for Republicans.

“2023 FINAL Liberty Scorecard, Colorado" The letter grades are brutal.

Click Here to see the Full Report

Recap of our Douglas County Elected Officials:

(S) Kevin Van Winkle (R) CO030, Score 83.5 (up 1.5 from last month)

303-866-4881, kevin.vanwinkle.senate@coleg.gov

S) Mark Baisley (R) CO004, Score 73 (up 3 from last month)

303-866-4877, mark.baisley@senate.co.com

(HR) Brandi Bradley (R) CO039, Score 68.8 (down .2 from last month)

303-866-2935, brandi.bradley.house@coleg.gov

(S) Jim Smallwood (R) CO002, Score 68.4 (up 2.4 from last month)

303-866-4869, SenatorSmallwood@gmail.com

(HR) Anthony Hartsook (R) CO044, Score 61.5 (up 1.5 from last month) The ONLY Doug Co Representative that openly voted for a Democrat House Chairperson when a Republican candidate was available to vote for. Day 266 with no apology to his constituents for this betrayal of the Republican Party. 303-866-2933, anthony.hartsook.house@coleg.gov

(HR) Lisa Frizell (R) CO045, Score 59.6 (up 1.6 from last month)

303-866-2948, lisa.frizell.house@coleg.gov

(HR) Bob Marshall (D) CO043, Score 26.8

303-866-2936, bob.marshall.house@coleg.gov

There is no spin here, these are the numbers from Liberty Scorecard. You may not like it, but it is an impartial scoring system to our constitution. I encourage all constituents if you don't like what you see in your representatives scores, call and email them. Provide your elected official's feedback and that loud voice!

"I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts.

Will Rogers

Kevin Van Winkle for Douglas County Commissioner

Possibly One of the Last Principled Man Standing

In an era where the theater of politics often overshadows substance, it is refreshing, even invigorating to witness a politician who transcends mere rhetoric. Enter Senator Kevin Van Winkle, a Douglas County native who manages to encapsulate what conservatism, at its core, should aspire to be: principled, grounded, and rooted in the Constitution. Look at his Liberty Score above ⇧, nice!

It's tempting in today's politics to lift the parachuting carpetbagger onto a pedestal. After all, they bring with them the allure of change, of something new. But how often we forget that real, transformative change emanates from the sole of the community. Van Winkle is the living testament to this. Born and raised in the place he now represents, he is a man whose voice echoes the collective wisdom and yearnings of his constituents.

What separates Van Winkle from the political chaff is his unwavering fidelity to the Constitution. This isn't the situational constitutionalism of convenience, invoked by so many. No, for Van Winkle, the Constitution is not just a framework; it is a creed. A set of beliefs delineated by "A" ratings from organizations that see through political charades and honor only those who hold steadfast to liberty’s guiding principles.

In a world racing towards homogeneity and federal oversight, Van Winkle stands as a stalwart defender of educational independence. He has set his legislative eyes on nothing less than reclaiming the educational system from the clutches of bureaucratic conformity. Parents, not faceless officials thousands of miles away, ought to sculpt the minds of the future. It's a simple idea but revolutionary in its implications.

In Douglas County, the question is not if we can afford to protect our children, but how we could afford not to. Van Winkle has not just supported but engineered efforts to secure our schools, providing a literal line of defense where platitudes meet the pavement.

To understand the Second Amendment through the lens of Van Winkle is to revisit its original purpose: a final safeguard against tyranny. He's taken the theoretical and made it legislative, pushing laws that affirm a citizen's right not just to bear arms but to use them in the defense of innocence.

Finally, and perhaps most significantly, Van Winkle grounds his politics in the most foundational right: the right to life. Here, his conservatism ceases to be political and becomes moral, existential even. Without life, all other rights dissipate into the ether. Van Winkle gets this. His sponsorship of pro-life measures isn't just political calculus; it's a profound moral stand.

So let us examine closely this rare breed of politician. Senator Kevin Van Winkle isn't just keeping a seat warm in the Colorado Senate, he's holding the line for a brand of conservatism that refuses to compromise its core values. In a landscape often devoid of genuine principle, he stands as a compelling testament to the enduring power of conservative ideals.

Kevin will make a great Douglas County Commissioner!

NO Vote on the Douglas County MLO and Why!

From our great friend George Allen🇺🇸

Dear DCSD Board of Directors,

Below is my critique of the Board’s estimated tax impact of 2023 MLO ballot questions of property taxpayers. My estimate is $413 for a $1.0 million appraised value home compared to the Board’s estimate of $240. My $413 estimate is the difference in property tax on a $1.0 million home of the MLO question passing versus not passing. The Board’s estimate of $240 includes the effect mill rate reductions (credits) from the MLOs approved in 2003, 2006 and 2018. By including those credits in its estimate of the cost of the 2023 MLO, the Board is disguising the true cost of this MLO ballot question. Writing in the August 3 Parker Chronicle, a Board representative, in an article ironically titled Property Taxes – Truths and Myths, stated:

The correct and transparent approach is to compare the 2024 property tax for a home with and without the 2023 MLO tax increase, which is $413 for a $1.0 million appraised value home. The taxpayers get these prior year MLO rate reductions (credits) whether the 2023 MLO passes or fails. So, they are irrelevant to the estimate of the tax impact of the 2023 MLO ballot question.

By netting the credits of prior year MLOs against the full tax cost of this 2023 MLO, the Board is assuming those tax credit amounts are DCSD money. The truth is the tax credits are taxpayer money not DCSD money. When MLOs were proposed in 2003, 2006 and 2018, the Board told the taxpayers that the taxpayers that the tax rates for those prior year MLOs would decline as the county grew and taxpayers would get credits in the form of rate reductions. Now the Board wants another MLO tax increase, and uses those tax credits to offset the full $413 cost of this 2023 MLO. The taxpayers are entitled to make their MLO voting decision on $413, the total tax increase of the 2023 MLO on a $1.0 million home. The Board’s scheme to present the cost of this new MLO as $240 ($200 with the debt) when the full cost is $413 is completely improper, deceptive, and unfair to the taxpayers.

There are other problems with your $200 estimate which I will bring up later. Keep in mind, that a Highlands Ranch home with a 2023 appraised value of $1.0 million and 130 mills of property tax, will see a 2024 property tax increase from $6,000 to $9,000. Then, this MLO, if it passes, will add another $413 to the $3,000 tax increase, resulting in a $9,413 total property tax bill for a $1.0 million home in Highlands Ranch. Would you agree this is pretty outrageous?

I would like the Board to continue to use its $240 tax impact estimate (or $200 as shown in the Parker Chronicle if the effect of the new debt is included), and I will present my estimate, and the voters can decide which estimate they believe, and which one is more credible.

I have a stream of issues, problems, errors, misrepresentations of your ballot questions that I will bring to the attention of the voters. This $413 tax impact disagreement is just the first one.

I recommend a NO vote of the MLO.

Thank you, George, for this great analysis you provided! We look forward to your additional thoughts on this important vote this November.

Douglas County School Board Race this November

This November, there will be 3 seats open on the Douglas County School Board. You can bet that the Dems are already foaming at the mouth to win/keep these seats. AND I DON'T WANT TO HEAR THAT THIS IS A NON-PARTISAN RACE.

District A - Susan Meek (West Highlands Ranch)
District C - Elizabeth Hanson (Central and South Highlands Ranch)
District F - David Ray - term-limited (Parker Area)

We need to elect to the school board individuals with strong conservative principles. They also need to be willing to challenge opposition in allowing FASTER-trained (or equivalent) teachers to carry sidearms in school.

They also need a strong opposition to all things CRT and gender ideolgy that are still being allowed in DougCo schools.

The entire county will vote for 3 of the candidates.

The candidates, 2 for District C and 1 for A & F:

Dave DiCarlo & Jason Page

Andy Jones

Maria Sumnicht

Mark your calendars!

On October 4, Parker Conservatives will host a candidate forum.

Click Here for Details

Why Coloradans Should Vote "NO" on Proposition HH

A Closer Look at the Devil in the Details

In the bustling corridors of Colorado politics, where rhetoric often outweighs reason, Proposition HH looms like an illusionist’s best trick. On its face, it promises a tax reduction, masquerading as a savior for the beleaguered homeowner drowning in soaring property taxes. But make no mistake, this is an illusion, not a solution.

Polls may show initial support for Proposition HH, but these numbers crumble the moment voters lift the veil of this legislative subterfuge. The lawmakers, under the auspices of Gov. Polesmoker, have crafted the ballot language with a level of sophistry that would make even Machiavelli blush. Sure, there's a slight reduction in the residential assessment rate and a $40,000 exemption from a home’s value for tax purposes. But what the legislature won't tell you is that these changes are akin to tossing a deck chair off the Titanic, they won't keep the ship from sinking.

Here's the heart of the matter, even if HH passes, we’re looking at the largest property tax hike in Colorado history. "Relief," you say? If this is relief, then I'd hate to see what their version of harm looks like. The state essentially proposes to ameliorate a 32% tax increase by knocking it down to 25%. This isn't relief; it's a less painful form of punishment.

But let’s dig deeper into the proposition's subtext—the TABOR refunds. This is the surplus returned to taxpayers when the state overcollects taxes. What the insidious wording of the ballot question leaves out is that the "surplus" it refers to is actually the TABOR refund that belongs to the citizens. Now, voting "yes" on Proposition HH is tantamount to writing a blank check to the state, without any real strings attached.

Over the years, the Polis plan would drain our TABOR refunds far more than any conceivable savings on property taxes. We’re talking about an increase in state taxes by up to $200 billion over the next 30 years.

And what of the alleged sunset clause after 10 years? Trust me, once the legislature gets a taste of this newfound revenue stream, they're unlikely to let it go easily.

And let’s not forget the gall of the Legislative Council Staff who, while non-partisan, are still under the thumb of a legislative committee that supports HH. Their Blue Book summary of the proposition should, in all honesty, state plainly: “This is a tax hike, people, not a break.”

So, fellow Coloradans, the onus is on us. We've been duped before, but let’s break the cycle. Talk to your neighbors, share this information, and debunk the myth of Proposition HH. Because the illusion only works if we let it. Vote "NO" on Proposition HH. It’s not just a bad deal—it’s a fiscal sleight of hand that we can ill afford.

Parker Town Council Seats November 2024

The upcoming November 2024 Town Council election in Parker, Colorado, isn't just a local affair, it's a battle for the soul of our community (the conservative soul). You see, we've got three seats up for grabs: John Diak, Laura Hefta, and Todd Hendrecks. Now, more than ever, Parker needs the kind of leaders who don't just carry a copy of the Constitution in their pockets but actually understand it and have the backbone to defend it.

And let's get something straight, this is not about partisanship. It's about philosophy. It's about having a conservative foundation, which means, among other things, respecting the Constitution. I'm talking about the bedrock principles of limited government, the rule of law, and individual liberties, ideals that seem to be forgotten the minute some people step into public office. We need council members willing to look the Town Planners and the Town Manager squarely in the eyes and say, "Not on my watch," when they try to overreach their authority.

But I digress, because there’s another dragon to slay here, and it’s the growing influence of developers. Yes, growth can be good, but let’s not kid ourselves: not all growth is created equal. We could very well wake up one day to find that our charming town has transformed into a sprawling suburban nightmare, indistinguishable from, say, Aurora. We need council members with the vision to see that the real estate developers are not the only ones with skin in the game, the residents, who actually live and breathe Parker, should have the final say.

Now, if you think most council members are independent thinkers, think again. A lot of them seem to abide by the credo of "go along to get along." They go with the flow, avoiding conflict and uncomfortable conversations. It's a kind of moral and intellectual laziness that could spell disaster for any community. Just look back at the voting records, you see more that is statistical possible of 6-0 votes. That's why we need candidates who can stand on their own two feet and who aren’t afraid to break ranks when the situation demands it.

So who and where are these candidates? We need to find them! We don’t need council members who are mere rubber stamps. We need leaders who will be as accountable to their constituents as they are committed to conservative principles. And folks, if we don’t , we’re only a few years away from becoming the next Aurora. We have already given up one seat to the Progressives at the last election, next will be seats to the Socialist’s and members of the Communist party. Don’t scoff, look at the makeup of the Aurora Town Council. And let that sink in!

"I mean, people need to remember without the grassroots, Ronald Reagan probably doesn't become president of the United States of America"

Michael Reagan

A note on Deep Space

Are you planning a conservative event and in search of the perfect venue? Deep Space in Parker could be an excellent fit for you if you expect at least 80 attendees and plan on ordering food and beverages. While there is a minimum spend requirement, this should easily be met with a guest list of 80-100 people. If you're interested, please contact me, and I'll connect you with the owners of Deep Space to discuss further details.

So, a question you might have is, “why Honey Badger”?

Honey Badgers have been described in the Guinness Book of Records as the "most fearless animal in the world" and can even fight off much larger predators like lions and hyenas if challenged. We know the political landscape is filled with hyenas, thus, we need the Honey Badger.

If you have a Parker or Douglas County topic that needs attention brought to it, please submit it to: Honey Badger Report, mark.hampton@comcast.net. I will review it and see about adding it to the monthly publication.

"True things prevail"

Tucker Carlson

Looking for a Conservative Business in Parker or Douglas County? Here is the latest Parker Conservative Business Directory. Click Here

If you have a business you would like us to add, just let us know.