The KIT ─ Knowledge & Information Technology
No. 267 - 1 July 2020
Was this forwarded to you?
In This Issue
Toward a US National Research Cloud
Virtual Computer Science Conference Calendar
3D Printing for Formula 1 Car Parts
KMWorld Report on Content and Knowledge Management
Seen Recently
Claude Baudoin

Consulting Services
  • IT Strategy
  • Enterprise Architecture Roadmap
  • Business Process Modeling & Analysis
  • Enterprise Software Selection
  • IT Innovation Briefings
  • IT Due Diligence
  • Executive IT Seminars
  • Cloud Computing
  • Security Maturity
  • Software Process
  • Knowledge Strategy
  • Technical Communities
  • Knowledge Capture
  • Taxonomy development
  • Enterprise Social Media
Contact Us:
cébé IT and Knowledge Management
www.cebe-itkm.com
info@cebe-itkm.com
+1 415 870 ITKM
Twitter: @cbaudoin
Archive:
Previous KIT Issues
Forward this issue to colleagues and friends: use the "forward email" link below at left, rather than "Forward" in your email software, to preserve your privacy, give the recipient more options (their own unsubscribe link, etc.) and to give us better click-through data. Thanks!
Toward a US-Wide Research Cloud?
Several U.S. companies (Google, Amazon, IBM) and universities (Stanford, Carnegie-Mellon, Ohio State) are joining an effort launched by several lawmakers on June 4 to create a National Research Cloud. This would make resources from large cloud providers available to academic researchers. The project bears some similarity to the ARPAnet (which, after several iterations, became the Internet) of 50 years ago. The lawmakers' press release (see above link) also explicitly invokes the risk of China's dominance in AI, thus recalling the quasi-panic about Japanese dominance of chip manufacturing that led to the creation of the SEMATECH research center in 1988. Thus, true to form, we are going to make this a matter of national pride and go at it alone instead of collaborating with other countries.

Just like Stanford's Vint Cerf played a key role in the architecture of the ARPAnet, two Stanford people are the key proponents of the new initiative: Prof. and former Provost John Etchemendy and Prof. Fei-Fei Li, co-founders of the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.

Of course, since this is the government, this initiative has to start with forming a task force, which will draw up a plan, which will... you get the idea. While our tax dollars should not be wasted, perhaps some of these people should read the Agile Manifesto.
Virtual Computer Science Conferences
One of the few positive effects of the current COVID-related lockdowns is that it is much easier to attend conferences that have moved to a virtual format. Registration fees have been considerably reduced or eliminated in many cases, and there are no travel costs. ACM just sent the following announcements of online conferences: As for SIGGRAPH Asia (officially the "Conference and Exhibition on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Asia"), it is still planned as an in-person event in Daegu, South Korea, on November 17-20. But as Dr. Fauci said, "we don't decide for the virus, the virus decides for us." It is safe to assume that the organizers are already making contingency plans in case packing a convention center is still a bad idea then.
3D Printing for Formula 1 Car Parts
In this short video, Renault engineers explain (in very British, not French, accents) the role that additive manufacturing, using 3D printing equipment from 3D Systems, a South Carolina company, plays in creating the custom parts needed for each year's new model of Grand Prix race cars.

Thanks to Joel Rosenberg, Expert in Smart Technology for the European Commission (among other titles) for sharing this.
KMWorld Report on Content and Knowledge Management
Earlier this year, KMWorld -- the organization behind the annual conference of the same name -- published a report entitled "Looking to the Future: 2020 Insight." We read it and digested it for you.

On the negative side, there are lots of platitudes or head-scratching pronouncements (here's a gem: "over the course of the past decade, digitalization has created an undeniable shift to bring businesses to where they are now." Duh.) The conclusion section is also an accumulation of obvious statements. This said, we extracted a few useful points:
  • Suppliers and customers appear to focus on customer experience -- specifically, arming call centers with the knowledge to answer customer questions. Much less attention is given to the internal sharing of knowledge in non-customer facing functions (engineering, manufacturing, maintenance, etc.) We think this is a mistake, especially considering how many people whose knowledge resides only in their heads are being laid off during crises such as the current one.
  • There's a bit of a "flight forward" attitude -- people haven't solved their knowledge capture and sharing yet, but they're already talking about adding AI to the mix, clearly viewing it as a magic bullet.
  • The market is growing quickly. "According to Fortune Business Insights, the global enterprise content management market size, which includes content workflow, document management, imaging and capturing, web content management, record management, mobile content management, digital asset management, and case management, was valued at $15.33 billion in 2018 and is projected to reach $43.16 billion by 2026 for a compound annual growth rate of 14%" (you will have noticed the use of completely useless precision in the target number, one of our pet peeves).
  • Data protection issues are well known by now, but the paper contains useful and specific estimates of the costs of compliance with regulations such as Europe's GDPR and California's CCPA -- and the cost of remedying data breaches when they occur.
  • The paper mentions knowledge graphs as an important technology to organize information and extend taxonomies and ontologies, but gives very little detail.
Seen Recently...
"We shouldn't presume that a group of experts somehow knows what's best."
-- U.S. Senator Rand Paul, in a widely mocked comment made during a
legislative hearing. The more charitable responses on the Internet
boiled down to "please look up the definition of the word 'expert'."